|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
|
Ads |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"Kyle Legate" wrote in message ws.com...
TritonRider wrote: From: "Kyle Legate" Kyle, what do microbiologists make for a salary? ****, compared to what they are worth. Selling the promise of benefits, even if you don't deliver will make them more money in one year than they would in ten in the lab. Cool. I'll just package some random DNA with some sterile water and lipids and move into a bigger apartment. Yeah, as well as it's ok for you that this arpartment might be located in say, Shanghai, that might work. I don't think Kurgan has always the most efficient way to argue his point, or that he has always a point at all, but you guys should really read up about the large scale doping experiments done in the DDR or other totalitarian (or whatever you might call it) regimes. There _will_ be people/groups willing to invest in performance enhancing "drugs", even if they have just be "proveen" with mice. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"enoch" wrote in message om... "Kyle Legate" wrote in message ws.com... TritonRider wrote: From: "Kyle Legate" Kyle, what do microbiologists make for a salary? ****, compared to what they are worth. Selling the promise of benefits, even if you don't deliver will make them more money in one year than they would in ten in the lab. Cool. I'll just package some random DNA with some sterile water and lipids and move into a bigger apartment. Yeah, as well as it's ok for you that this arpartment might be located in say, Shanghai, that might work. I don't think Kurgan has always the most efficient way to argue his point, Dumbass - You are correct, I am not being very clear in this thread. Nick and Legate have been making the contention that genetic vaccines are still years away from being proven in clinical trials, but that doesn't factor into my position at all. The on the fringe athletes aren't going to care about those clinical trials or side effects and they won't be getting the stuff from a normal lab. Like Ben Johnson's doctor, from Haiti (or Jamaica, I can't remember). |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message Dumbass - You are correct, I am not being very clear in this thread. Nick and Legate have been making the contention that genetic vaccines are still years away from being proven in clinical trials, but that doesn't factor into my position at all. The on the fringe athletes aren't going to care about those clinical trials or side effects and they won't be getting the stuff from a normal lab. Like Ben Johnson's doctor, from Haiti (or Jamaica, I can't remember). Like Dario Frigo's "Hemassist" dealer at the airport? |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"Carl Sundquist" wrote in message ... "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message Dumbass - You are correct, I am not being very clear in this thread. Nick and Legate have been making the contention that genetic vaccines are still years away from being proven in clinical trials, but that doesn't factor into my position at all. The on the fringe athletes aren't going to care about those clinical trials or side effects and they won't be getting the stuff from a normal lab. Like Ben Johnson's doctor, from Haiti (or Jamaica, I can't remember). Like Dario Frigo's "Hemassist" dealer at the airport? You got it. Surely there will be bogus stuff going out, but there's going to be some enterprising lab rat who's going to send out something that works too (with unknown side effects). |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message Dumbass - Just as with hgh, the type of athletes who will try the genetic vaccine will accept the risks of the potential side-effects you mention. That is a ridiculous argument. Every time someone tries to explain that it is virtually impossible to gain benefits, you say, "Well, that does not mean they won't try". But you were talking about RESULTS when you started the thread, not whether someone will start playing with it. Who cares if there are a few Frankenstiens coming? That has nothing to do with sports performance, unless a top athlete tries it and ruins his health. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"Carl Sundquist" wrote in message ... "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message Dumbass - You are correct, I am not being very clear in this thread. Nick and Legate have been making the contention that genetic vaccines are still years away from being proven in clinical trials, but that doesn't factor into my position at all. The on the fringe athletes aren't going to care about those clinical trials or side effects and they won't be getting the stuff from a normal lab. Like Ben Johnson's doctor, from Haiti (or Jamaica, I can't remember). Like Dario Frigo's "Hemassist" dealer at the airport? Exactly. And what all came from that? Nothing performance wise. It was a case of intent. You are arguing my point. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"Nick Burns" wrote in message m... "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message Dumbass - Just as with hgh, the type of athletes who will try the genetic vaccine will accept the risks of the potential side-effects you mention. That is a ridiculous argument. Every time someone tries to explain that it is virtually impossible to gain benefits, you say, "Well, that does not mean they won't try". But you were talking about RESULTS when you started the thread, not whether someone will start playing with it. Who cares if there are a few Frankenstiens coming? That has nothing to do with sports performance, unless a top athlete tries it and ruins his health. Dumbass - They'll be able to get results. What differentiates someone like Lance Armstrong from you and me? Attitude certainly, but what else? genetics. http://maxmag.maxsportsinternational...e28/28sci1.htm With relatively few old-timers showing an inclination to pump iron three times a week for the rest of their of lives, the potential market for an alternative muscle-building drug is clearly enormous. Science finally appears close to creating one. In separate experiments over the past couple of years at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center in Philadelphia, and University College Medical School in London, as well as the Copenhagen Muscle Research Center in Sweden, researchers have tested muscle-building vaccines based on engineered genes. Injected into mice, these vaccines have boosted muscle mass in the animals legs by 15 to 27%. Amazingly, these increases were measurable in only a month or so and did not require any exercise at all! Many muscle researchers believe that the first human trials will occur within the next couple of years. This could also be a major breakthrough for the treatment of a host of degenerative muscle diseases, including the various forms of muscular dystrophy. On the down side, it takes little imagination to see the possibilities for abuse of the vaccines by healthy young athletes in power sports such as football, weight lifting, sprinting and short-distance swimming. Compared with anabolic steroids, a vaccine based on an engineered gene would offer some major advantages. It would need to be administered only one time, rather than periodically, and it would be essentially undetectable in the body. MUSCLE PHYSIOLOGY 101 A single muscle cell consists of a membrane, many scattered nuclei that contains genes and thousands of inner strands called myofibrils. Filling the inside of muscle fiber, the myofibrils can be as long as the fiber and are the part that enables the cells to contract forcefully in response to nerve impulses. The actual contraction is accomplished by the myofibril tiny component units which are called sarcomeres. Within each sarcomere are two proteins, called myosin and actin, whose interaction causes contraction of the muscle. Basically, during contraction a sarcomere is shortened like a collapsing telescope, as the actin filaments at each end of a central myosin filament slide toward to the myosin's center. Muscle cells, also known as fibers cannot split themselves to form completely new fibers. A muscle can become more massive only when its individual fibers become thicker. What causes this thickening is the creation of new myofibrils. The mechanical stresses that exercise exerts on tendons and other structures connected to the muscle trigger different biochemical pathways that ultimately cause the muscle cells to make more proteins. Enormous amounts of these proteins, chiefly myosin and actin, are needed as the cell produces additional myofibrils. As muscle cells cannot divide, the new nuclei are donated by so-called satellite cells, which are scattered among the many nuclei on the surface of a skeletal muscle fiber. Satellite cells proliferate in response to the stresses and wear and tear of exercise. As they multiply, some remain as satellites on the fiber, but others become incorporated into it. With these additional nuclei, the fiber is able to turn out more proteins and create more myofibrils. Rigorous exercise inflicts tiny "micro tears" in muscle fibers. The damaged area attracts the satellite cells, which incorporate themselves into the muscle tissue and begin producing proteins to fill the gap. Gradually, as more micro tears are repaired in this manner, the overall number of nuclei grows, as does the fiber itself (i.e. muscle enlarges). One component of the myosin molecule, the so-called heavy chain, determines the functional characteristics of the muscle fiber. In an adult, this heavy chain exists in three different forms, known as isoforms. These isoforms are designated Type I, Type IIa, and Type IIx, as are the fibers that contain them. Type I fibers are also known as slow fibers; Type IIa and IIx are referred to as fast fibers. The fibers are called slow and fast for good reason; the maximum contraction velocity of a single Type I fiber is approximately 1/10th of every Type IIx fiber. The velocity of Type IIa fibers are somewhere between those of Type I and IIx. Slow fibers depend more on relatively efficient aerobic exercise where as the fast fibers depend more on anaerobic exercise. Thus, slow fibers are important for endurance activities and sports such as long distance running, cycling, or swimming, where as fast fibers are key to power pursuits such as weight lifting and sprinting. The "average" healthy adult has relatively equal numbers of slow and fast fibers in say the quadriceps muscle of the thigh. But as a species, humans show a great variation in this regard. A person with a predominance of slow fibers would probably become an accomplished marathoner but would never get anywhere as a sprinter or power lifter; the opposite would be true of a person with the predominance of fast fibers. MUSCLE CONVERSION When healthy muscles are loaded heavily and repeatedly, as in weight training programs, the number of fast IIx fibers declines as they convert to fast IIa fibers. In those fibers, the nuclei stop expressing the IIx gene and begin expressing the IIa. If vigorous exercise continues for about a month or more, the IIx fibers will completely transform to IIa fibers. At the same time, the fibers increase their production of proteins, becoming thicker (hypertrophy). CONVERTING SLOW TO FAST? Is it possible to convert the slower Type I fibers to faster Type II fibers? In the early 1990's there was an indication that a rigorous exercise regimen could convert slow fibers to fast IIa fibers. Researchers at the University of Copenhagen Muscle Research Center suggested that a program of vigorous weight training supplemented with other forms of anaerobic exercise converts not only Type IIx fibers to IIa, but also Type I fibers to IIa. If a certain type of exertion can convert some Type I fibers to IIa, we might naturally wonder if some other kind can convert IIa to I. It may be possible, but so far no link in human training studies has unambiguously demonstrated such a shift. It is true, star endurance athletes such as long-distance runners and swimmers, cyclists and cross-country skiers generally have remarkably high proportions (up to 95%, as mentioned earlier) of slow Type I fibers in their major muscle groups, such as in the legs. Yet at present we do not know whether these athletes were born with such a high percentage Type I fibers and gravitated toward sports that take advantage of unusual inborn traits or whether they very gradually increased the proportion of Type I fibers in their muscles as they trained over a period of many months or years. Researchers have found that hypertrophy from resistance training enlarges Type II fibers twice as much as it does type I fibers. Thus, weight training can increase the cross-sectional area of the muscle covered by fast fibers without changing the relative ratio between the number of slow and faster fibers in the muscle. It is the relative cross-sectional area of the fast and slow fiber that determines the functional characteristics of the entire muscle. The more area covered by fast fibers, the fast and more powerful the overall muscle will be. So a sprinter at least has the option of altering the characteristics of his or her leg muscles by exercising them with weights to increase the relative cross section of fast fibers. THE ERA OF GENETIC MANIPULATION Although certain types of fiber conversion, such as IIa to I appear to be difficult to bring about through exercise, the time is rapidly approaching when researchers do have the capability to accomplish such conversions easily through genetic techniques. Such genetic manipulations, most likely in the form of vaccines that insert artificial genes into the nuclei of muscle cells, will almost certainly be the performance enhancing drugs of the future. The tiny snippets of genetic material and the proteins that gene therapy will leave behind in the athletes muscle cells may be difficult, if not will be impossible, to identify as foreign. Gene therapy is now being researched intensively in most developed countries for a host of very good reasons. Instead of treating the deficiencies by injecting drugs, doctors will be able to prescribe genetic treatments that will induce the bodies own protein-making machinery to produce the proteins needed to combat illness. Like ordinary genes, the artificial gene consists of DNA. It can be delivered to the body in several ways. Suppose the gene is encoded for one of the many signaling proteins or hormones (testosterone or growth hormone) that stimulate muscle growth. The approach would be to inject the DNA via vaccine into the muscle. The muscle fibers would then take up the DNA and add it to the normal pool of genes. This method is not very efficient yet, so researchers often use viruses to carry the gene payload into a cells nuclei. A virus is essentially a collection of genes packed in a protein capsule that is able to bind to a cell and inject the genes. Scientists replace the viruses own genes with the artificial gene (i.e. the muscle growth stimulator gene), which the virus will then efficiently deliver to the cells in the body. GET PUMPED THE EASY WAY It is easy to see how the narcissist would find the drug irresistible. A vaccine to build muscle mainly where it was injected, making it possible for even the lazy and uncoordinated to sculpt their bodies by doing nothing more strenuous than lifting a hypodermic needle. Big biceps, nice calves and big bulging pecs would all be just a few injections away. Of course, an instant physique of this kind would not come without a physiological price. To improve performance or look really buff, athletes and body builders would probably need to take considerably larger doses than what doctors will prescribe for therapy. Thus, they would probably suffer some of the already known or suspected side effects for abuse of IGF-1, such as an enlarged heart and possibly cardiac arrest. THE GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SUPER ATHLETE These techniques will be abused by athletes in the future. Sports officials will be hard-pressed to detect the abuse, because the artificial genes will produce proteins that in many cases are identical to the normal proteins. Furthermore, only one injection will be needed, minimizing the risk of disclosure. It is true that officials would be able to detect the DNA of the artificial gene itself, but to do so they would have to know the sequence of the artificial gene, and the esters would have to obtain a sample of the tissue containing the DNA. Today, however, biopsies are not permitted as part of a routine anti-doping test. For all intents and purposes, gene doping will be undetectable. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
VDB admits doping...?
"Nick Burns" wrote in message m... "Carl Sundquist" wrote in message ... "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message Dumbass - You are correct, I am not being very clear in this thread. Nick and Legate have been making the contention that genetic vaccines are still years away from being proven in clinical trials, but that doesn't factor into my position at all. The on the fringe athletes aren't going to care about those clinical trials or side effects and they won't be getting the stuff from a normal lab. Like Ben Johnson's doctor, from Haiti (or Jamaica, I can't remember). Like Dario Frigo's "Hemassist" dealer at the airport? Exactly. And what all came from that? Nothing performance wise. It was a case of intent. You are arguing my point. Dumbass - http://maxmag.maxsportsinternational...e28/28sci1.htm With relatively few old-timers showing an inclination to pump iron three times a week for the rest of their of lives, the potential market for an alternative muscle-building drug is clearly enormous. Science finally appears close to creating one. In separate experiments over the past couple of years at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center in Philadelphia, and University College Medical School in London, as well as the Copenhagen Muscle Research Center in Sweden, researchers have tested muscle-building vaccines based on engineered genes. Injected into mice, these vaccines have boosted muscle mass in the animals legs by 15 to 27%. Amazingly, these increases were measurable in only a month or so and did not require any exercise at all! Many muscle researchers believe that the first human trials will occur within the next couple of years. This could also be a major breakthrough for the treatment of a host of degenerative muscle diseases, including the various forms of muscular dystrophy. On the down side, it takes little imagination to see the possibilities for abuse of the vaccines by healthy young athletes in power sports such as football, weight lifting, sprinting and short-distance swimming. Compared with anabolic steroids, a vaccine based on an engineered gene would offer some major advantages. It would need to be administered only one time, rather than periodically, and it would be essentially undetectable in the body. MUSCLE PHYSIOLOGY 101 A single muscle cell consists of a membrane, many scattered nuclei that contains genes and thousands of inner strands called myofibrils. Filling the inside of muscle fiber, the myofibrils can be as long as the fiber and are the part that enables the cells to contract forcefully in response to nerve impulses. The actual contraction is accomplished by the myofibril tiny component units which are called sarcomeres. Within each sarcomere are two proteins, called myosin and actin, whose interaction causes contraction of the muscle. Basically, during contraction a sarcomere is shortened like a collapsing telescope, as the actin filaments at each end of a central myosin filament slide toward to the myosin's center. Muscle cells, also known as fibers cannot split themselves to form completely new fibers. A muscle can become more massive only when its individual fibers become thicker. What causes this thickening is the creation of new myofibrils. The mechanical stresses that exercise exerts on tendons and other structures connected to the muscle trigger different biochemical pathways that ultimately cause the muscle cells to make more proteins. Enormous amounts of these proteins, chiefly myosin and actin, are needed as the cell produces additional myofibrils. As muscle cells cannot divide, the new nuclei are donated by so-called satellite cells, which are scattered among the many nuclei on the surface of a skeletal muscle fiber. Satellite cells proliferate in response to the stresses and wear and tear of exercise. As they multiply, some remain as satellites on the fiber, but others become incorporated into it. With these additional nuclei, the fiber is able to turn out more proteins and create more myofibrils. Rigorous exercise inflicts tiny "micro tears" in muscle fibers. The damaged area attracts the satellite cells, which incorporate themselves into the muscle tissue and begin producing proteins to fill the gap. Gradually, as more micro tears are repaired in this manner, the overall number of nuclei grows, as does the fiber itself (i.e. muscle enlarges). One component of the myosin molecule, the so-called heavy chain, determines the functional characteristics of the muscle fiber. In an adult, this heavy chain exists in three different forms, known as isoforms. These isoforms are designated Type I, Type IIa, and Type IIx, as are the fibers that contain them. Type I fibers are also known as slow fibers; Type IIa and IIx are referred to as fast fibers. The fibers are called slow and fast for good reason; the maximum contraction velocity of a single Type I fiber is approximately 1/10th of every Type IIx fiber. The velocity of Type IIa fibers are somewhere between those of Type I and IIx. Slow fibers depend more on relatively efficient aerobic exercise where as the fast fibers depend more on anaerobic exercise. Thus, slow fibers are important for endurance activities and sports such as long distance running, cycling, or swimming, where as fast fibers are key to power pursuits such as weight lifting and sprinting. The "average" healthy adult has relatively equal numbers of slow and fast fibers in say the quadriceps muscle of the thigh. But as a species, humans show a great variation in this regard. A person with a predominance of slow fibers would probably become an accomplished marathoner but would never get anywhere as a sprinter or power lifter; the opposite would be true of a person with the predominance of fast fibers. MUSCLE CONVERSION When healthy muscles are loaded heavily and repeatedly, as in weight training programs, the number of fast IIx fibers declines as they convert to fast IIa fibers. In those fibers, the nuclei stop expressing the IIx gene and begin expressing the IIa. If vigorous exercise continues for about a month or more, the IIx fibers will completely transform to IIa fibers. At the same time, the fibers increase their production of proteins, becoming thicker (hypertrophy). CONVERTING SLOW TO FAST? Is it possible to convert the slower Type I fibers to faster Type II fibers? In the early 1990's there was an indication that a rigorous exercise regimen could convert slow fibers to fast IIa fibers. Researchers at the University of Copenhagen Muscle Research Center suggested that a program of vigorous weight training supplemented with other forms of anaerobic exercise converts not only Type IIx fibers to IIa, but also Type I fibers to IIa. If a certain type of exertion can convert some Type I fibers to IIa, we might naturally wonder if some other kind can convert IIa to I. It may be possible, but so far no link in human training studies has unambiguously demonstrated such a shift. It is true, star endurance athletes such as long-distance runners and swimmers, cyclists and cross-country skiers generally have remarkably high proportions (up to 95%, as mentioned earlier) of slow Type I fibers in their major muscle groups, such as in the legs. Yet at present we do not know whether these athletes were born with such a high percentage Type I fibers and gravitated toward sports that take advantage of unusual inborn traits or whether they very gradually increased the proportion of Type I fibers in their muscles as they trained over a period of many months or years. Researchers have found that hypertrophy from resistance training enlarges Type II fibers twice as much as it does type I fibers. Thus, weight training can increase the cross-sectional area of the muscle covered by fast fibers without changing the relative ratio between the number of slow and faster fibers in the muscle. It is the relative cross-sectional area of the fast and slow fiber that determines the functional characteristics of the entire muscle. The more area covered by fast fibers, the fast and more powerful the overall muscle will be. So a sprinter at least has the option of altering the characteristics of his or her leg muscles by exercising them with weights to increase the relative cross section of fast fibers. THE ERA OF GENETIC MANIPULATION Although certain types of fiber conversion, such as IIa to I appear to be difficult to bring about through exercise, the time is rapidly approaching when researchers do have the capability to accomplish such conversions easily through genetic techniques. Such genetic manipulations, most likely in the form of vaccines that insert artificial genes into the nuclei of muscle cells, will almost certainly be the performance enhancing drugs of the future. The tiny snippets of genetic material and the proteins that gene therapy will leave behind in the athletes muscle cells may be difficult, if not will be impossible, to identify as foreign. Gene therapy is now being researched intensively in most developed countries for a host of very good reasons. Instead of treating the deficiencies by injecting drugs, doctors will be able to prescribe genetic treatments that will induce the bodies own protein-making machinery to produce the proteins needed to combat illness. Like ordinary genes, the artificial gene consists of DNA. It can be delivered to the body in several ways. Suppose the gene is encoded for one of the many signaling proteins or hormones (testosterone or growth hormone) that stimulate muscle growth. The approach would be to inject the DNA via vaccine into the muscle. The muscle fibers would then take up the DNA and add it to the normal pool of genes. This method is not very efficient yet, so researchers often use viruses to carry the gene payload into a cells nuclei. A virus is essentially a collection of genes packed in a protein capsule that is able to bind to a cell and inject the genes. Scientists replace the viruses own genes with the artificial gene (i.e. the muscle growth stimulator gene), which the virus will then efficiently deliver to the cells in the body. GET PUMPED THE EASY WAY It is easy to see how the narcissist would find the drug irresistible. A vaccine to build muscle mainly where it was injected, making it possible for even the lazy and uncoordinated to sculpt their bodies by doing nothing more strenuous than lifting a hypodermic needle. Big biceps, nice calves and big bulging pecs would all be just a few injections away. Of course, an instant physique of this kind would not come without a physiological price. To improve performance or look really buff, athletes and body builders would probably need to take considerably larger doses than what doctors will prescribe for therapy. Thus, they would probably suffer some of the already known or suspected side effects for abuse of IGF-1, such as an enlarged heart and possibly cardiac arrest. THE GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SUPER ATHLETE These techniques will be abused by athletes in the future. Sports officials will be hard-pressed to detect the abuse, because the artificial genes will produce proteins that in many cases are identical to the normal proteins. Furthermore, only one injection will be needed, minimizing the risk of disclosure. It is true that officials would be able to detect the DNA of the artificial gene itself, but to do so they would have to know the sequence of the artificial gene, and the esters would have to obtain a sample of the tissue containing the DNA. Today, however, biopsies are not permitted as part of a routine anti-doping test. For all intents and purposes, gene doping will be undetectable. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Armstrong Angry About Break-In - Planting Doping Agents !! | Churchill | General | 8 | July 18th 04 09:17 AM |
Doping or not? Read this: | never_doped | Racing | 0 | August 4th 03 01:46 AM |
Ullrich admits Stage 5 stomach trouble | one of the six billion | Racing | 6 | July 17th 03 09:16 PM |