Careful

http://www.misterfoo.com/photos/misc/warnings.jpg

--
Warren wanked William while Wendy wildly wobbled Wayne's Willy within warm water.

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 14:06:17 UTC+1, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
http://www.misterfoo.com/photos/misc/warnings.jpg

That is an obvious rip off of our decades old sign.

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/image...river-bank.jpg

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:30:32 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 14:06:17 UTC+1, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
http://www.misterfoo.com/photos/misc/warnings.jpg

That is an obvious rip off of our decades old sign.

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/image...river-bank.jpg

People who can't see a ****ing quayside deserve to fall in.

--
What happens if you install windows 98 on a system with 2 processors?
It crashes twice.

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:30:32 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 14:06:17 UTC+1, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
http://www.misterfoo.com/photos/misc/warnings.jpg

That is an obvious rip off of our decades old sign.

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/image...river-bank.jpg

http://static1.squarespace.com/stati...g?format=1500w

--
A man and his wife are ****ing.
Fifteen minutes has passed, 30 minutes, then 45 minutes.
Sweat is pouring off both of them.
The wife finally looks up and says, "What's the matter darling, can't you think of anyone else either?"

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 14:38:45 UTC+1, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:30:32 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 14:06:17 UTC+1, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
http://www.misterfoo.com/photos/misc/warnings.jpg

That is an obvious rip off of our decades old sign.

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/image...river-bank.jpg

People who can't see a ****ing quayside deserve to fall in.

How about not seeing a column of tanks?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...rners-car.html

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:53:38 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 14:38:45 UTC+1, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:30:32 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 14:06:17 UTC+1, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
http://www.misterfoo.com/photos/misc/warnings.jpg

That is an obvious rip off of our decades old sign.

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/image...river-bank.jpg

People who can't see a ****ing quayside deserve to fall in.

How about not seeing a column of tanks?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...rners-car.html

Three interesting points:

1) It was a woman.
2) It was a British tank and a German car driver.
3) How was he not able to stop? I thought those things were bloody powerful and had good grips? If he turned, he did so by braking one track, he could have braked both tracks.

--
A Smith and Wesson beats four Aces.

On 07/10/2015 14:59, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
I thought those things were bloody powerful and had good grips?
If he turned, he did so by braking one track, he could have braked both tracks.

To turn, one track would only have to go slower than the other it would
not have to be motionless.

A tank (actually a Leopard II) braking hard, note how much it travels
even with full braking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCk_l-IRyJg

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:14:28 +0100, soup wrote:

On 07/10/2015 14:59, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
I thought those things were bloody powerful and had good grips?
If he turned, he did so by braking one track, he could have braked both tracks.

To turn, one track would only have to go slower than the other it would
not have to be motionless.

A tank (actually a Leopard II) braking hard, note how much it travels
even with full braking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCk_l-IRyJg

I guess the weight counteracts the good grip.

--
Don't take life so seriously, it's not permanent.

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 15:14:27 UTC+1, soup wrote:
On 07/10/2015 14:59, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
I thought those things were bloody powerful and had good grips?
If he turned, he did so by braking one track, he could have braked both tracks.

To turn, one track would only have to go slower than the other it would
not have to be motionless.

A tank (actually a Leopard II) braking hard, note how much it travels
even with full braking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCk_l-IRyJg

Metal on tarmac has less grip than rubber on tarmac.

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:24:57 +0100, Alycidon wrote:

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 15:14:27 UTC+1, soup wrote:
On 07/10/2015 14:59, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
I thought those things were bloody powerful and had good grips?
If he turned, he did so by braking one track, he could have braked both tracks.

To turn, one track would only have to go slower than the other it would
not have to be motionless.

A tank (actually a Leopard II) braking hard, note how much it travels
even with full braking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCk_l-IRyJg

Metal on tarmac has less grip than rubber on tarmac.

It's very ribbed metal, which would dig into the delves in the tarmac.

--
Best Friend Experiment:
Put your dog and your wife in the trunk of the car for an hour.
When you open the trunk, who is really happy to see you!