#521
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
"Tim McNamara" wrote in message ... "JJ" writes: "Tim McNamara" wrote in message ... "JJ" writes: Heine would hardly be an objective source for anything non-vintage. LOL. Again you are treating your assumptions as if they were facts. The acid test for Jan is useability for his purpose, not vintage. You crack me up, man! Who are you trying to fool? Mr. Heine is editor and publisher of "Vintage Bicycle Quarterly." Hardly a promoter of STI, one would imagine. Your imagination seems to he the source of your problems. Have you read VBQ, or read Jan's description of how he thinks about and assesses bicycles? Don't be misled by the "vintage" in the title. The most recent bike they tested in VBQ was a 2005 Weigle randonneur and they gave it top marks- the equal of Rene Herse or Alex Singer. And it had Ergo. Gasp! A brifter setup? On, my.... Granted, he and Jaye Haworthe *did* finish first in the mixed tandem category at Paris-Brest-Paris in 2003... on a 50 year old Rene Herse tandem that helped them to outperform all but one other tandem in the event. They were flying when they blew by me. And Jan has set the fastest times over 200, 300 and 400 km brevets in Seattle on Herse and Singer bikes from the 40s to the 60s. You should get a little more educated about "vintage," JJ. Apart from the aesthetic aspect, some of those old guys were pretty smart. Indexed derailleurs in the 1930s, brifters in the 1940s, fully equipped fendered randonneur bikes weighing under 20 lbs in the 1940s, telescopic suspension forks in the 50s, systems where you could remove the rear wheel and never have to touch the chain, direct-pull (V brakes) in the 50s, etc., etc. Les bicyclettes, les fromages et les vins- those French knew their stuff! Certainmont and still do. |
Ads |
#522
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
"Tim McNamara" wrote in message ... "JJ" writes: Broken record, repetitive twisting of posts. It's not like you've said anything new to respond to, JJ. You've got one point you keep making- the shift levers are right under your hands when your hands are on the brake levers. On this you base your whole argument for the superiority of brifters. Once again, Mr. Twister, the brifters aren't superior for everyone neccessarily, but they are for my purposes. Other than that, you dodge and weave, cast aspersions and innuendo, offer vague assertions Bwaaahahaha....! Please quote me. Oops, sorry, I forgot, you don't have the time. So do please continue to make it up as you go along. It's a real *timesaver* for you. and pulled-out-of-your-ass "predictions." It was obvious so why are you complaining? Or you just don't get itt? |
#523
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
"Ozark Bicycle" wrote in message ups.com... Pat Lamb wrote: Ozark Bicycle wrote: I like the fact that Ergo is serviceble, etc., and that it does not use indexed front shifting. I also like that the brake lever does not serve two functions. That said, for me, both Ergo and STI are an answer to a question I'm not asking. I find indexed barends perfectly convenient for recreational riding and like their simplicity, flexibility and day-to-day-reliability (even though you can service Ergo, a latched up Ergo lever is a PITA in the middle of a ride). If the choice were only between indexed DT shifters vs. Ergo/STI, I'd pick Ergo first, STI second and DT levers third because the "downsides" of the brifters are offset by the greatly improved convenience. But, indexed barends *do* exist, and I find them the perfect answer. If I may interrupt the on-going flame war with an on-topic question - Is a left/front bar-end shifter _indexed_, like STI, or ratcheting, like Ergo? On Shimano barends, the left (front) shifter is a well-designed, pure friction lever. IMO, indexed front shifting, with all it's limitations, is one of the worst aspects of STI. I rather liked the friction shift on the fdr. The STI is ok for the front, but I wouldn't plan on any speed shifting running a triple. I like the non-indexed Ergo front shifting, too, but I've been thinking about a new bike that might have bar-ends. Would that constrain me to Shimano road derailers, and (big) Shimano chainrings? IME, you have pretty wide freedom to mix/match FDs and chainrings, so long as the chainring combo is within the capacity of the FD. |
#524
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
I am puzzled why you feel the need to ascribe to marketing what seems to be a simple fact based on the functionality of the product. "Seems" is subjective. There are a lot of people here to whom it does not seem that way. What seems clear to *me* is that the ratio here of people who prefer barcons to those who prefer integrated shifters is far higher than the ratio of barcon equipped bikes to STI equipped bikes on display in any LBS I've been into. I don't know how the ratio of vocal participants is biased relative to those who remain silent; however, it is an extremely good indication to me that marketing forces are biased towards integrated shifters in spite of relative merits rather than because of them. -- Benjamin Lewis Now is the time for all good men to come to. -- Walt Kelly |
#525
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
"Benjamin Lewis" wrote in message ... John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: I am puzzled why you feel the need to ascribe to marketing what seems to be a simple fact based on the functionality of the product. "Seems" is subjective. There are a lot of people here to whom it does not seem that way. What seems clear to *me* is that the ratio here of people who prefer barcons to those who prefer integrated shifters is far higher than the ratio of barcon equipped bikes to STI equipped bikes on display in any LBS I've been into. I don't know how the ratio of vocal participants is biased relative to those who remain silent; however, it is an extremely good indication to me that marketing forces are biased towards integrated shifters in spite of relative merits rather than because of them. -- Benjamin Lewis Now is the time for all good men to come to. -- Walt Kelly There has to be how many road bike riders in the world? 100,000? 500,000? A million? And a handful have posted here to this thread. The sample is way too small to come to any conclusion. |
#526
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:29:43 GMT, Benjamin Lewis
wrote: John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: I am puzzled why you feel the need to ascribe to marketing what seems to be a simple fact based on the functionality of the product. "Seems" is subjective. There are a lot of people here to whom it does not seem that way. What seems clear to *me* is that the ratio here of people who prefer barcons to those who prefer integrated shifters is far higher than the ratio of barcon equipped bikes to STI equipped bikes on display in any LBS I've been into. True now. But what about the period before STI was available and barcons were? That period of time -- and the transition to STI and Ergo being super-popular -- tell us a lot about the popularity (or lack of it) of barcons. If you think a bunch of blowhards like Ozark and Cole are at all representative of a normal cross-section of cyclists, you're way off. At least when I use obscure stuff myself, I don't try to paint it as useful for any significant portion of the cycling community and I recognize that. JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#527
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
Benjamin Lewis wrote:
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: I am puzzled why you feel the need to ascribe to marketing what seems to be a simple fact based on the functionality of the product. "Seems" is subjective. There are a lot of people here to whom it does not seem that way. What seems clear to *me* is that the ratio here of people who prefer barcons to those who prefer integrated shifters is far higher than the ratio of barcon equipped bikes to STI equipped bikes on display in any LBS I've been into. I don't know how the ratio of vocal participants is biased relative to those who remain silent; however, it is an extremely good indication to me that marketing forces are biased towards integrated shifters in spite of relative merits rather than because of them. There are really three kinds of cyclists, even in this group. 1) Those who will only use older technology (DT/Barcon) 2) Those who will only use newer technology (Brifters) 3) Those who really do not car one way or another You might find in a group like this, 5% - 10% fall into the first group, 5 - 10% fall into the second group, and everyone else falls into the third group. W |
#528
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:45:21 -0600, Tim McNamara
wrote: John Forrest Tomlinson writes: On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:46:02 -0600, Tim McNamara wrote: nor do I accept the implication that that brifters are better for everyone. I have repeatedly said that they are better overall (looking at the whole cycling population). snip Tim, please stop trying to "win" this discussion by putting words in my mouth. Except I am obviously not putting words in your mouth. "Everyone" is only a slight generalization of your position. *Slight*? I've use words like "most", "majority", "widespread", "few" and the phrase "six or nine out of ten." Plus I have described explicitly at least three situations where STI/Ergo may not be useful and other systems are a better choice, You're either extremely sloppy in your understanding of language or just being disengenous. Either way, it's lame. If you want to quibble about what most means go ahead. If you want to argue that, say, the situations of cost precluding some people from getting STI is such a remote possiblity that it basically never happens, go ahead. But understand that "most" means "more than half but not all." . A "few" means some small number but more than "none". "Everyone" means "All people." Not "most people." It's not complicated so don't mix these things up. You seem to allow that there are six or seven people for whom brifters are not ideal. If you are suggesting I mean six or seven people out of the number of participants in this thread, then perhaps we're in the ballpark. If you mean six or seven out of all the people who buy or choose bikes each month or year (in, say, the US -- many thousands of people), then you're grossly exaggerating my positon. Orders of magnitude off. If you want to set up a straw man to knock down, being more subtle helps slip it by. But I thought you were above *winning* arguments. JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#529
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
The Wogster wrote:
There are really three kinds of cyclists, even in this group. 1) Those who will only use older technology (DT/Barcon) 2) Those who will only use newer technology (Brifters) 3) Those who really do not car one way or another ^^^ You might find in a group like this, 5% - 10% fall into the first group, 5 - 10% fall into the second group, and everyone else falls into the third group. Hey Wogster, I like that typo! -- Ted Bennett |
#530
|
|||
|
|||
bar-end shifters
Ted Bennett wrote:
The Wogster wrote: There are really three kinds of cyclists, even in this group. 1) Those who will only use older technology (DT/Barcon) 2) Those who will only use newer technology (Brifters) 3) Those who really do not car one way or another ^^^ You might find in a group like this, 5% - 10% fall into the first group, 5 - 10% fall into the second group, and everyone else falls into the third group. Hey Wogster, I like that typo! Okay, make that do not care one way or another. #$@!%$ spell checker. W |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rapidfire shifters seized/stuck? | Darryn | Australia | 3 | November 12th 05 04:16 PM |
quality 8 speed MTB shifters? (or 9 spd shifter with 8 spd cassette)? | Pizza Man | Techniques | 40 | October 18th 04 06:29 AM |
upgrading grip shifters to triggers | david kenning | UK | 3 | March 14th 04 08:26 PM |
Technical query, triple STI shifters | MartinM | UK | 6 | February 22nd 04 10:39 AM |
old Suntour 6sp stem shifters... | Garry Broad | Techniques | 6 | September 22nd 03 09:49 PM |