|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#941
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:37:49 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: The second point is that removing road signs, in line with Hans Monderman's "naked streets" ideas, might make the roads safer. And after a short time with GPS in the Prius, I have to say that it is entirely doable in the near future. Don't need the entire map system display, just a couple of text displays. No problem about reading road signs at night or worry about missing signs. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
Ads |
#942
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:17:21 -0400, Curtis L. Russell
wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:37:49 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote: The second point is that removing road signs, in line with Hans Monderman's "naked streets" ideas, might make the roads safer. And after a short time with GPS in the Prius, I have to say that it is entirely doable in the near future. Don't need the entire map system display, just a couple of text displays. No problem about reading road signs at night or worry about missing signs. Uhhh, dude, you know there are people who travel w/o cars sometimes -- like walking or even (gasp) on a bike. Are we supposed to carry a GPS at all times too? JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#943
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:36:18 -0400, John Forrest Tomlinson
wrote: Uhhh, dude, you know there are people who travel w/o cars sometimes -- like walking or even (gasp) on a bike. Are we supposed to carry a GPS at all times too? JT Good point. Yes. Need to ask my son to get me a good buy before they tear down the signs. I can be a guide for the out-of-towners when I retire, if they have a GPS with a really big read-out. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#944
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:02:08 -0400, Curtis L. Russell
wrote: Good point. Yes. Need to ask my son to get me a good buy before they tear down the signs. I can be a guide for the out-of-towners when I retire, if they have a GPS with a really big read-out. I'm going to be a crotchety old guy and just tell them "Can't get there from here" when I get old. JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#945
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
Quoting Mark & Steven Bornfeld :
David Damerell wrote: Which is all well and good, but doesn't really get us any closer to the point; I think brakes have a net positive effect on safety, and hence your original assertion is unjustified. I'm finished with this thread. I just want to clear up that I never claimed brakes had no positive effect on safety. Who said you did? No-one. -- David Damerell Kill the tomato! Today is First Tuesday, August. |
#946
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
So the important question is - is this the longest running thread on usenet?
Sure seems like it! Lee |
#947
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
I submit that on or about Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:15:21 GMT, the person
known to the court as SMS made a statement in Your Honour's bundle) to the following effect: Incredible, isn't it? People should be grateful for your taking time out of your busy schedule to tell them their experience counts for nothing, their judgment is worthless and their assessment of the benefits of different types of system is necessarily wrong! I don't care about the grateful part, but unfortunately you are often correct about your next three statements. It's sometimes very difficult for a person to get beyond, 'I do it this way, I've always done it this way, I haven't experienced any negative consequences doing it this way, so my way is obviously a good way.' We noticed. That is, after all, your usual MO. As far as the relative merits of the different kinds of lights, I am certainly not alone, among lighting experts, in stating the safety benefits of the higher brightness lights, while recognizing the self-sufficiency and convenience aspects of of dynamo systems (I do own some dynamo systems). 1. How many of them urge people "not to trust" such systems? 2. Where is your evidence? Comparative per-mile casualty stats would settle any dispute. The "Myths and Facts" section at "http://nordicgroup.us/s78/myths.html" is probably the best place for you to start your quest for knowledge, once you decide to open your mind. Ah, so those of us who think all systems are usable need to "open our minds" in order to accept that only one kind of system is any good. Silly of me not to notice. Interestingly, your "myths and facts" presentation in both lights and helmets pretends that all the errors are on the other side; it's amusing how tortured you need to make this sometimes in order to make one of your own worst faults seem as if it's only exhibited by those who disagree with you! Naturally, since you apparently sincerely believe that you are one of Earth's greatest experts on everything, it is inconceivable that your cherished beliefs could be anything less than Revealed Truth. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
#948
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
I submit that on or about Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:55:56 GMT, the person
known to the court as SMS made a statement in Your Honour's bundle) to the following effect: Yesterday I took my kids, and two nieces bicycling in Monterey. I realized that I had packed everything, except my own helmet. I didn't know what to do. I thought about those people who are just positive that risk compensation would rear its ugly head and I was terrified that I would suddenly begin riding at 2 mph and would have to pull over every time a car or bicycle approached from the front or rear. Amazingly, I found that I did not ride any differently with or without a helmet. Excellent straw man. As anybody who is even vaguely interested in risk compensation theory will know, the balancing behaviour exhibited tends to be subtle. Since crashes tend to be the result not of the taking of large risks, but of the taking of small risks very large numbers of times, that is all that's needed. Barry Pless, editor of Injury Prevention, used to dismiss risk compensation, as well. He set out to prove it didn't happen. He was rather surprised when the results of his study showed that risk compensation theory is exactly correct. "Risk compensation in children's activities: A pilot study", Mok D, Gore G, Hagel B, Mok E, Magdalinos H, Pless B. 2004. Paediatr Child Health: Vol 9 No 5 May/June 2004 Once again you confuse "no evidence with which Scharf agrees" for "no evidence". A natural consequence of your titanic hubris, I'm afraid. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound |
#949
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
Per Tom Kunich:
That is to say that accidents in which a motorcyclist is killed from a head injury alone and in which the head injury therefore sustained could be mediated by a motorcycle helmet to less than lethal are so rare as to be a statistical freak. If you read the accident reports and the statistics you can arrive at no other answer. Still sounds fishy to me. Perhaps not on a purely technical/legalistic basis - but I'd guess there are plenty of non-lethal head injuries that cause lasting damage. Long time ago, some drunk nailed me on my Yamaha YDS-6 when I was going about 50 mph. I was wearing one of those Bell helmets that come down low on the sides and the back of the neck, but don't cover the face. I flew through the air head-first in a sort of swan dive posture, hit the blacktop face-first, and things deteriorated rapidly from then on. Cracked the helmet, suspect I wound up putting my dentist's kid through at least two semesters of college, and saw flashes of light for several days afterwards. My feeling is that even if that helmet didn't save my life, it probably kept me from becoming even more of a raving idiot than I am. -- PeteCresswell |
#950
|
|||
|
|||
Trikki Beltran's bad concussion and his helmet
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:17:47 -0400, "Lee" lee_AT_SHOES_wheelman_DOT_com
wrote: So the important question is - is this the longest running thread on usenet? Sure seems like it! Are you kidding? In a mere two or three weeks and a niggling 1000 posts? Legendary usenet Threads That Would Not Die tend to be in the more than a year, over 5000 messages ballpark. Under that, don't even bother. Jasper |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|