The demise of professional cycling

in message .com,
') wrote:

do you feel about firm podium girls?

whenever possible.

--
(Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

((DoctorWho)ChristopherEccleston).act();
uk.co.bbc.TypecastException: actor does not want to be typecast.
[adapted from autofile on /., 31/03/05]

Curtis L. Russell wrote in
:

snip
Leaning toward them, as much as possible. And I realize now that my
last sentence could be taken two ways. If you have your choice between
being firmly against a particular podium girl and being firmly against
having podium girls as a concept, I'd lean toward the first. As much
as possible.

I would think you would stand up straight against the podium girls.

--
Bill Asher

On Thu, 03 May 2007 22:08:40 +0200, Donald Munro
wrote:

Bill C wrote:
Should slow down, and use spell check, but, damn, that ruins the flow
of the conversation for me. Lots of little idiosyncracies that require
the good will of others.

Michael Press wrote:
You misspelled `idiosyncrasies', dumbass.

Dumbass,
On rbr we're all idiotsyncratic by definition otherwise we wouldn't be
here.

Nirvana on rbr is the achievement on occasion of idiot synchronicity.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

On May 3, 7:12 am, Kyle Legate wrote:
Montesquiou wrote:
"Howard Kveck" a écrit dans le message de news:
...
In article , Montesquiou
wrote:

How many true champions left the sport because they never accepted the
dopping ?
We never will know.
That's true. But you're forgetting that the answer might as easily be
"none" as any that you may be thinking of.

As I know one of them, I was sure that "none" was not the answer.
It happens around 15/16 Y old

He said true champions, not teenage might-have-beens.

Are we still talking about podium girls here, or back to the riders?

Kyle Legate wrote:
He said true champions, not teenage might-have-beens.

need more sun wrote:
Are we still talking about podium girls here, or back to the riders?

Presumably teenage might-have-been podium girls are the ones who had to
be woken up every hour to roll over lest their breast implants suffocate
them.

In article ,
Curtis L. Russell wrote:

On Thu, 03 May 2007 22:08:40 +0200, Donald Munro
wrote:

Bill C wrote:
Should slow down, and use spell check, but, damn, that ruins the flow
of the conversation for me. Lots of little idiosyncracies that require
the good will of others.

Michael Press wrote:
You misspelled `idiosyncrasies', dumbass.

Dumbass,
On rbr we're all idiotsyncratic by definition otherwise we wouldn't be
here.

Nirvana on rbr is the achievement on occasion of idiot synchronicity.

Which is often a case of having all the cranks in line.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?