Bicyclist shot

MagillaGorilla wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:

Hank wrote:

On Nov 24, 1:31 pm, datakoll wrote:

http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2008/...ort-collier-de...
Yeah, this guy sounds like a nutjob. Nothing to do with being a
bicyclist. Point anything gun-shaped at a cop and you get what you
get.

In the case of black people who get shot by white cops, that could mean
pointing anything from a wallet to a driver's license. Or even a
cell phone.
Basically anything that you can put in the report that you thought
was a gun.

butbutbut, all young black men are criminals! [1] end sarcasm

A good example of bias:
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/29376044.html. Note that the
Journal-Sentinel is a politically right leaning paper that is targeted
mainly towards white suburbanites.

[1] At least in the eyes of a certain segment of the population.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the precipitate.


Let's get something straight here, Sherman Tank. That paper /is/ a
white supremacist rag. And the only reason they reported about this
group of rogue cop "Punishers" who beat up black suspects was because it
was the subject of a federal prosecution. Had the FBI and federal
prosecutor not put this case in federal court and indicted this cop,
this newspaper and this lazy reporter would have buried this story and
denied the existence of this "Punishers" group. A real investigative
reporter would have outed this group on his or her own initiative, which
would have led to these rogue cops getting arrested. Think Woodward
and Bernstein.

In this case, the cart is before the horse: the reporter is nothing but
a ****ing stenographer after the fact.

You are too easily impressed by lazy reporters. This is what Joe
Lindsey on Bicycling.com does in his *Boulder Report.*..he re-packages
reporting done by others and tries to pass it off as unique
journalism. In fact, it's lazy-ass bull**** because the guy hasn't
written a single original article in the past 5 years that hasn't
already been reported by others. All he does is re-gift others'
articles and call it "The Boulder Report" by Joe Lindsey as if he
actually had anything to do with a single fact in it.

Mr. Gorilla,

You missed the point. Precisely because the Journal Sentinel IS right
wing, their reporting on racist cops bears more credibility in the eyes
of the masses.

I like your little axiom in your signature though. You seem to have
thing for plagiarism.

I never claimed authorship, so it is not plagiarism.

Thanks,

Magilla

http://boulderreport.bicycling.com/2...g-out-thi.html

How does Hanna-Barbara feel about you using the copyrighted name of one
of their characters?

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the precipitate.

Tom Sherman wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:

Hank wrote:

On Nov 24, 1:31 pm, datakoll wrote:

http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2008/...ort-collier-de...
Yeah, this guy sounds like a nutjob. Nothing to do with being a
bicyclist. Point anything gun-shaped at a cop and you get what you
get.

In the case of black people who get shot by white cops, that could mean
pointing anything from a wallet to a driver's license. Or even a
cell phone.
Basically anything that you can put in the report that you thought
was a gun.

butbutbut, all young black men are criminals! [1] end sarcasm

A good example of bias:
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/29376044.html. Note that the
Journal-Sentinel is a politically right leaning paper that is targeted
mainly towards white suburbanites.

[1] At least in the eyes of a certain segment of the population.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the precipitate.


Let's get something straight here, Sherman Tank. That paper /is/ a
white supremacist rag. And the only reason they reported about this
group of rogue cop "Punishers" who beat up black suspects was because it
was the subject of a federal prosecution. Had the FBI and federal
prosecutor not put this case in federal court and indicted this cop,
this newspaper and this lazy reporter would have buried this story and
denied the existence of this "Punishers" group. A real investigative
reporter would have outed this group on his or her own initiative, which
would have led to these rogue cops getting arrested. Think Woodward
and Bernstein.

In this case, the cart is before the horse: the reporter is nothing but
a ****ing stenographer after the fact.

You are too easily impressed by lazy reporters. This is what Joe
Lindsey on Bicycling.com does in his *Boulder Report.*..he re-packages
reporting done by others and tries to pass it off as unique
journalism. In fact, it's lazy-ass bull**** because the guy hasn't
written a single original article in the past 5 years that hasn't
already been reported by others. All he does is re-gift others'
articles and call it "The Boulder Report" by Joe Lindsey as if he
actually had anything to do with a single fact in it.

Mr. Gorilla,

You missed the point. Precisely because the Journal Sentinel IS right
wing, their reporting on racist cops bears more credibility in the eyes
of the masses.

I like your little axiom in your signature though. You seem to have
thing for plagiarism.

I never claimed authorship, so it is not plagiarism.

Thanks,

Magilla

http://boulderreport.bicycling.com/2...g-out-thi.html

How does Hanna-Barbara feel about you using the copyrighted name of one
of their characters?

Well, let me tell you something. I don't know who Hanna-Barbara is, quite
frankly. I know who Hanna-Barbera is, but not Hanna-Barbara. Apparently you
were talking about someone else though, so I really don't know.


Take care,


Magilla

MagillaGorilla wrote:


Tom Sherman wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:

Hank wrote:

On Nov 24, 1:31 pm, datakoll wrote:


http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2008/...ort-collier-de...
Yeah, this guy sounds like a nutjob. Nothing to do with being a
bicyclist. Point anything gun-shaped at a cop and you get what you
get.

In the case of black people who get shot by white cops, that
could mean
pointing anything from a wallet to a driver's license. Or even a
cell phone.
Basically anything that you can put in the report that you thought
was a gun.

butbutbut, all young black men are criminals! [1] end sarcasm

A good example of bias:
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/29376044.html. Note that the
Journal-Sentinel is a politically right leaning paper that is targeted
mainly towards white suburbanites.

[1] At least in the eyes of a certain segment of the population.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the
precipitate.


Let's get something straight here, Sherman Tank. That paper /is/ a
white supremacist rag. And the only reason they reported about this
group of rogue cop "Punishers" who beat up black suspects was
because it
was the subject of a federal prosecution. Had the FBI and federal
prosecutor not put this case in federal court and indicted this cop,
this newspaper and this lazy reporter would have buried this story and
denied the existence of this "Punishers" group. A real investigative
reporter would have outed this group on his or her own initiative,
which
would have led to these rogue cops getting arrested. Think Woodward
and Bernstein.

In this case, the cart is before the horse: the reporter is nothing but
a ****ing stenographer after the fact.

You are too easily impressed by lazy reporters. This is what Joe
Lindsey on Bicycling.com does in his *Boulder Report.*..he re-packages
reporting done by others and tries to pass it off as unique
journalism. In fact, it's lazy-ass bull**** because the guy hasn't
written a single original article in the past 5 years that hasn't
already been reported by others. All he does is re-gift others'
articles and call it "The Boulder Report" by Joe Lindsey as if he
actually had anything to do with a single fact in it.

Mr. Gorilla,

You missed the point. Precisely because the Journal Sentinel IS right
wing, their reporting on racist cops bears more credibility in the eyes
of the masses.

I like your little axiom in your signature though. You seem to have
thing for plagiarism.

I never claimed authorship, so it is not plagiarism.

Thanks,

Magilla

http://boulderreport.bicycling.com/2...g-out-thi.html

How does Hanna-Barbara feel about you using the copyrighted name of one
of their characters?

Well, let me tell you something. I don't know who Hanna-Barbara is,
quite frankly. I know who Hanna-Barb*e*ra is, but not Hanna-Barb*a*ra.
Apparently you were talking about someone else though, so I really don't
know.


Take care,


Magilla


Good one! You really told him! Wow!

Carl Sundquist wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:


Tom Sherman wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:

Hank wrote:

On Nov 24, 1:31 pm, datakoll wrote:


http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2008/...ort-collier-de...
Yeah, this guy sounds like a nutjob. Nothing to do with being a
bicyclist. Point anything gun-shaped at a cop and you get what you
get.

In the case of black people who get shot by white cops, that
could mean
pointing anything from a wallet to a driver's license. Or even a
cell phone.
Basically anything that you can put in the report that you thought
was a gun.

butbutbut, all young black men are criminals! [1] end sarcasm

A good example of bias:
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/29376044.html. Note that the
Journal-Sentinel is a politically right leaning paper that is
targeted
mainly towards white suburbanites.

[1] At least in the eyes of a certain segment of the population.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the
precipitate.


Let's get something straight here, Sherman Tank. That paper /is/ a
white supremacist rag. And the only reason they reported about this
group of rogue cop "Punishers" who beat up black suspects was
because it
was the subject of a federal prosecution. Had the FBI and federal
prosecutor not put this case in federal court and indicted this cop,
this newspaper and this lazy reporter would have buried this story and
denied the existence of this "Punishers" group. A real investigative
reporter would have outed this group on his or her own initiative,
which
would have led to these rogue cops getting arrested. Think Woodward
and Bernstein.

In this case, the cart is before the horse: the reporter is nothing
but
a ****ing stenographer after the fact.

You are too easily impressed by lazy reporters. This is what Joe
Lindsey on Bicycling.com does in his *Boulder Report.*..he re-packages
reporting done by others and tries to pass it off as unique
journalism. In fact, it's lazy-ass bull**** because the guy hasn't
written a single original article in the past 5 years that hasn't
already been reported by others. All he does is re-gift others'
articles and call it "The Boulder Report" by Joe Lindsey as if he
actually had anything to do with a single fact in it.

Mr. Gorilla,

You missed the point. Precisely because the Journal Sentinel IS right
wing, their reporting on racist cops bears more credibility in the eyes
of the masses.

I like your little axiom in your signature though. You seem to have
thing for plagiarism.

I never claimed authorship, so it is not plagiarism.

Thanks,

Magilla

http://boulderreport.bicycling.com/2...g-out-thi.html

How does Hanna-Barbara feel about you using the copyrighted name of one
of their characters?

Well, let me tell you something. I don't know who Hanna-Barbara is,
quite frankly. I know who Hanna-Barb*e*ra is, but not
Hanna-Barb*a*ra. Apparently you were talking about someone else
though, so I really don't know.


Take care,


Magilla


Good one! You really told him! Wow!

I cut and pasted the name, but the spell checker changed it.

I suspect Mr. Gorilla is a fine person in real life who just likes to
bark on the Internet.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the
precipitate. - Anon?

Carl Sundquist wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:


Tom Sherman wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:

Hank wrote:

On Nov 24, 1:31 pm, datakoll wrote:


http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2008/...ort-collier-de...
Yeah, this guy sounds like a nutjob. Nothing to do with being a
bicyclist. Point anything gun-shaped at a cop and you get what you
get.

In the case of black people who get shot by white cops, that
could mean
pointing anything from a wallet to a driver's license. Or even a
cell phone.
Basically anything that you can put in the report that you thought
was a gun.

butbutbut, all young black men are criminals! [1] end sarcasm

A good example of bias:
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/29376044.html. Note that the
Journal-Sentinel is a politically right leaning paper that is targeted
mainly towards white suburbanites.

[1] At least in the eyes of a certain segment of the population.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the
precipitate.


Let's get something straight here, Sherman Tank. That paper /is/ a
white supremacist rag. And the only reason they reported about this
group of rogue cop "Punishers" who beat up black suspects was
because it
was the subject of a federal prosecution. Had the FBI and federal
prosecutor not put this case in federal court and indicted this cop,
this newspaper and this lazy reporter would have buried this story and
denied the existence of this "Punishers" group. A real investigative
reporter would have outed this group on his or her own initiative,
which
would have led to these rogue cops getting arrested. Think Woodward
and Bernstein.

In this case, the cart is before the horse: the reporter is nothing but
a ****ing stenographer after the fact.

You are too easily impressed by lazy reporters. This is what Joe
Lindsey on Bicycling.com does in his *Boulder Report.*..he re-packages
reporting done by others and tries to pass it off as unique
journalism. In fact, it's lazy-ass bull**** because the guy hasn't
written a single original article in the past 5 years that hasn't
already been reported by others. All he does is re-gift others'
articles and call it "The Boulder Report" by Joe Lindsey as if he
actually had anything to do with a single fact in it.

Mr. Gorilla,

You missed the point. Precisely because the Journal Sentinel IS right
wing, their reporting on racist cops bears more credibility in the eyes
of the masses.

I like your little axiom in your signature though. You seem to have
thing for plagiarism.

I never claimed authorship, so it is not plagiarism.

Thanks,

Magilla

http://boulderreport.bicycling.com/2...g-out-thi.html

How does Hanna-Barbara feel about you using the copyrighted name of one
of their characters?

Well, let me tell you something. I don't know who Hanna-Barbara is,
quite frankly. I know who Hanna-Barb*e*ra is, but not Hanna-Barb*a*ra.
Apparently you were talking about someone else though, so I really don't
know.


Take care,


Magilla


Good one! You really told him! Wow!

The monkey has a very accomplished team of trial lawyers who are not afraid to
get their simian client off on a technicality, O-Carl Wan. 8p

Magilla

In article ,
Tom Sherman wrote:

Carl Sundquist wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:


Tom Sherman wrote:

MagillaGorilla wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:

Hank wrote:

On Nov 24, 1:31 pm, datakoll wrote:


http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2008/...ort-collier-de...
Yeah, this guy sounds like a nutjob. Nothing to do with being a
bicyclist. Point anything gun-shaped at a cop and you get what you
get.

In the case of black people who get shot by white cops, that
could mean
pointing anything from a wallet to a driver's license. Or even a
cell phone.
Basically anything that you can put in the report that you thought
was a gun.

butbutbut, all young black men are criminals! [1] end sarcasm

A good example of bias:
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/29376044.html. Note that the
Journal-Sentinel is a politically right leaning paper that is
targeted
mainly towards white suburbanites.

[1] At least in the eyes of a certain segment of the population.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the
precipitate.


Let's get something straight here, Sherman Tank. That paper /is/ a
white supremacist rag. And the only reason they reported about this
group of rogue cop "Punishers" who beat up black suspects was
because it
was the subject of a federal prosecution. Had the FBI and federal
prosecutor not put this case in federal court and indicted this cop,
this newspaper and this lazy reporter would have buried this story and
denied the existence of this "Punishers" group. A real investigative
reporter would have outed this group on his or her own initiative,
which
would have led to these rogue cops getting arrested. Think Woodward
and Bernstein.

In this case, the cart is before the horse: the reporter is nothing
but
a ****ing stenographer after the fact.

You are too easily impressed by lazy reporters. This is what Joe
Lindsey on Bicycling.com does in his *Boulder Report.*..he re-packages
reporting done by others and tries to pass it off as unique
journalism. In fact, it's lazy-ass bull**** because the guy hasn't
written a single original article in the past 5 years that hasn't
already been reported by others. All he does is re-gift others'
articles and call it "The Boulder Report" by Joe Lindsey as if he
actually had anything to do with a single fact in it.

Mr. Gorilla,

You missed the point. Precisely because the Journal Sentinel IS right
wing, their reporting on racist cops bears more credibility in the eyes
of the masses.

I like your little axiom in your signature though. You seem to have
thing for plagiarism.

I never claimed authorship, so it is not plagiarism.

Thanks,

Magilla

http://boulderreport.bicycling.com/2...g-out-thi.html

How does Hanna-Barbara feel about you using the copyrighted name of one
of their characters?

Well, let me tell you something. I don't know who Hanna-Barbara is,
quite frankly. I know who Hanna-Barb*e*ra is, but not
Hanna-Barb*a*ra. Apparently you were talking about someone else
though, so I really don't know.


Take care,


Magilla


Good one! You really told him! Wow!

I cut and pasted the name, but the spell checker changed it.

It's not your fault.

--
Michael Press