|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
On 24/04/2011 08:31, Doug wrote:
On Apr 23, 4:02 pm, wrote: Doug wrote: The TV news this morning showed the appalling smog over London and people with breathing difficulties were advised to stay indoors. Doesn't it seem strange though that individuals are actually allowed to cause such harm to others with their polluting motor vehicles and why is there no legal redress to this? http://airtext.infoshows how the pollution is distributed over London this morning. Change all max speed limits to minimum speed limits. At a stroke, cars would spend less time on the roads, and there would be less congestion. What about bottlenecks where the speedy drivers will end up sitting stationary while still pumping out their nasty pollution? Absolutely. We could clear a lot of bottlenecks by abolishing bus-lanes and re-phasing traffic lights so as to improve junction capacity. Others could be ameliorated by instituting a proper road-building and improvement programme. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
On 25/04/2011 01:10, Phil W Lee wrote:
considered Sun, 24 Apr 2011 20:06:49 +0100 the perfect time to write: On 23/04/2011 09:42, Doug wrote: The TV news this morning showed the appalling smog over London and people with breathing difficulties were advised to stay indoors. Doesn't it seem strange though that individuals are actually allowed to cause such harm to others with their polluting motor vehicles and why is there no legal redress to this? http://airtext.info shows how the pollution is distributed over London this morning. Doug. Would it be correct to say that mean life expectancy has roughly doubled since the invention of the motor car, and continues to increase? No, it wouldn't. And even if it was, correlation is not causation. Would it be correct to say that mean life expectancy has increased significantly since the invention of the motor car, and that it continues to increase? |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
On Apr 25, 11:48*am, Mike P wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 03:30:47 -0700, Doug wibbled: On Apr 25, 9:15*am, Mike P wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:49:35 -0700, Doug wibbled: On Apr 24, 5:26*pm, Mike P wrote: On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:04:56 -0700, Doug wibbled: On Apr 24, 11:00*am, The Medway Handyman wrote: On 24/04/2011 08:30, Doug wrote: On Apr 23, 2:11 pm, *wrote: On Apr 23, 9:42 am, *wrote: The TV news this morning showed the appalling smog over London and people with breathing difficulties were advised to stay indoors. Doesn't it seem strange though that individuals are actually allowed to cause such harm to others with their polluting motor vehicles and why is there no legal redress to this? http://airtext.infoshowshowthepollutionisdistributed over London this morning. Doug. Move away from London. *Nasty place anyway. Unfortunately the pollution is nation wide and there is no escape from it. Fine here in Kent. *Clear as a bell. Typically anecdotal. So the government should stop worrying people I suppose, just because you think everything is OK? Toxic ozone from cars is invisible. Alsohttp://www.airtext.info/shows'High' pollution Funny how the defra website with today's stats on has the pollution at LOW at 95 sites and MODERATE at 27 sites. High isn't even on the map. That's real stats, taken from 3pm today. Link? Looks like your link is a load of ****e, as per usual Doug. So why don't you publish yours then? I thought you might have the brains to find it. It is, after all, DEFRA's air pollution site - with measurements taken every few hours and published soon after. It even explains in great detail what each element is, and has records going back years. Go on, I dare you. Try using google to find DEFRA's air pollution site UK. Your inability to support your claim with a link duly noted and I see that you are also unilaterally deleting text you cannot deal with. Your inability to use google or what passes for your brain noted. It's DEFRA Doug FFS. The Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. www.defra.gov.uk See if you can find it from there. It took me all of 10 seconds when I looked yesterday. You just don't get it do you? It is not good merely providing a link to a massive website, you need to be more specific by providing a link to the section in question, preferably also with a quote. You seem completely unable to do this. Your site is a load of ********. What about the government pollution warning then? You don't like it do you, because you pollute with your car. How about this from the BBC? "Newspaper review: Er that's a review of newspapers Doug. It's irrelevant. I suppose they're also talking about the Royal Wedding too. I had you killfiled for ages, as you were becoming boring. You're still boring, but at least I don't feel grubby taking the **** out of you like I do with Oldfield. The newspapers also mention the government air pollution warning, as if you didn't know. It's a newspaper review, it's irrelevant Doug. Just like you. Still deleting text you can't cope with, Mike? Doug. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:25:32 +0100, davidlang wrote:
You really are a complete & utter **** aren't you? I love ****s! They are warm and wriggly and .... -- 67.4% of statistics are made up. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:47:38 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller
wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:25:32 +0100, davidlang wrote: You really are a complete & utter **** aren't you? I love ****s! They are warm and wriggly and .... You really are very mature you know. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:53:15 +0100, Judith wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:47:38 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:25:32 +0100, davidlang wrote: You really are a complete & utter **** aren't you? I love ****s! They are warm and wriggly and .... You really are very mature you know. Yep. Been around a bit. How is yours? -- 67.4% of statistics are made up. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
Peter Keller wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:53:15 +0100, Judith wrote: On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:47:38 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote: You really are a complete & utter **** aren't you? I love ****s! They are warm and wriggly and .... You really are very mature you know. Yep. Been around a bit. Care to tell us which bit wriggles then? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:52:56 +0100, Norman Wells wrote:
Peter Keller wrote: On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:53:15 +0100, Judith wrote: On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:47:38 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote: You really are a complete & utter **** aren't you? I love ****s! They are warm and wriggly and .... You really are very mature you know. Yep. Been around a bit. Care to tell us which bit wriggles then? I think I would rather tell judith. -- 67.4% of statistics are made up. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High pollution warning everywhere in Central London today. | Doug[_3_] | UK | 1 | April 20th 11 06:02 PM |
London pollution warning. | Doug[_3_] | UK | 38 | March 29th 11 09:00 AM |
Warning: Magilla Impotence Counter and Warning Signal | Anton Berlin | Racing | 0 | August 15th 09 09:58 PM |
IMBA Uses 50+ Motor Vehicles to Put on Its "Environmentally Friendly" Epic Ride! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 0 | May 7th 07 04:15 PM |
IMBA Uses 50+ Motor Vehicles to Put on Its "Environmentally Friendly" Epic Ride! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 0 | May 7th 07 04:15 PM |