|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 01:14:20 GMT, JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? In the meantime, there is nothing remotely insulting in pointing out that someone who is too dangerous, too stupid or too lacking in skills (singly or in any combination) to have a driving licence is still fully qualified to ride a bike. Perhaps that should not be the legal situation. But it is. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 11:15:03 AM UTC+1, Simon Mason wrote:
billymansell replied to AidanR | 143 posts | 19 hours ago 4 likes Firstly, not all drivers who honk their horn are being impatient. True but we don't know whether that relates here as we've only heard one side. But none of that justifies forcing the driver to stop the car and then hitting it hard enough to leave a dent. Again we've only heard one side. Maybe the cyclist felt threatened by an impatient driver who used his horn aggressively and feared he would use his car as a weapon. Yes, nobody was hurt, but how did the driver and his wife know that it would stop there? Maybe, just maybe, the driver shouldn't have started a confrontation, intentionally or otherwise. Again we don't know the full events without hearing the other side. How would you feel if it happened to your parents or grandparents? Please, not a strawman. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:30:43 GMT, JNugent
wrote: On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 01:14:20 GMT, JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? I don't have any faith that you can set aside your blinkers, sadly. In the meantime, there is nothing remotely insulting in pointing out that someone who is too dangerous, too stupid or too lacking in skills (singly or in any combination) to have a driving licence is still fully qualified to ride a bike. Ah, here we go again. Perhaps that should not be the legal situation. But it is. I hear you say it's all about Legalities not about Safety. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On 12/07/2020 21:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? I don't have any faith that you can set aside your blinkers, sadly. You don't want to give up the insults. OK. In the meantime, there is nothing remotely insulting in pointing out that someone who is too dangerous, too stupid or too lacking in skills (singly or in any combination) to have a driving licence is still fully qualified to ride a bike. Ah, here we go again. Which bit of it was the slightest bit inaccurate? Perhaps that should not be the legal situation. But it is. I hear you say it's all about Legalities not about Safety. Then let me expand it a little in order to accommodate your reasonable concern. Someone who is too anti-social (even sociopathic) and far too prone to causing danger on the roads to be trusted with a driving licence is nevertheless deemed safe enough to be a cyclist. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:22:42 GMT, JNugent
wrote: On 12/07/2020 21:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? I don't have any faith that you can set aside your blinkers, sadly. You don't want to give up the insults. OK. Eh? If you think that's an insult you must be everso sensitive. In the meantime, there is nothing remotely insulting in pointing out that someone who is too dangerous, too stupid or too lacking in skills (singly or in any combination) to have a driving licence is still fully qualified to ride a bike. Ah, here we go again. Which bit of it was the slightest bit inaccurate? Perhaps that should not be the legal situation. But it is. I hear you say it's all about Legalities not about Safety. Then let me expand it a little in order to accommodate your reasonable concern. Someone who is too anti-social (even sociopathic) and far too prone to causing danger on the roads to be trusted with a driving licence is nevertheless deemed safe enough to be a cyclist. I'm sure you're trolling, but have you never heard of momentum? These large metal boxes that you seem so keen to promote can cause serious injury and death if not used properly - society handles this by requiring various standards [of manufacture, maintenence and care when driving] to be met; the danger from a cycle is much, much less. Got it? -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On 10:50 11 Jul 2020, Simon Mason said:
QUOTE: Police are on the hunt for a cyclist after an incident on a country road which left a driver with a damaged rear door on his car. Cambridgeshire police says it is investigating a report of 'public order and criminal damage' that took place near West Wratting on June 8. The 70-year-old driver of the car, who lives in Linton but does not wish to be named, said the incident on the B1052 where it enters West Wratting left his wife 'extremely stressed', adding that the attacker 'needs to be caught'. Describing the incident, a statement from Cambridgeshire police said: “It was reported that the victim, a man in his 70s, was driving along the B1052 when he approached a group of cyclists and sounded his horn to alert them that he was close by and about to overtake.(BAD MOVE -SM) “At this point, it's reported one cyclist pulled out into the road and stopped, bringing the driver to a halt. “The cyclist then lifted his bike and began shouting verbal abuse towards the driver. “As the victim attempted to drive off, damage was caused to the vehicle causing a dent to one of the rear passenger doors. “The suspect has then got back on his bike and continued riding in the direction of West Wratting. “No arrests have been made and the investigation is ongoing.” The victim said the incident left a 'significant dent' in a rear door panel of his car's passenger door – which he estimates will cost £300 to £400 to repair – and happened when he and his wife were taking their first drive out for months. They had both been shielding because of Covid-19. He added: “The damage to my wife is inestimable. She is actually terrified of me actually talking to anyone about this. She has been destroyed by this. “She was really distressed. “I think from the public's perspective he needs to be caught. Can you imagine that someone can stop a car in the middle of the road and use his bike to bang the side of the car and then get off scot-free. I don't think that is reasonable.” https://www.haverhillecho.co.uk/news...cyclist-after- report-of-road-rage-incident-9115903/ A disgraceful incident. Some cyclists can't restrain their violent hatred of motorists. They should attend unconscious bias training. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On 13/07/2020 12:27, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:22:42 GMT, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 21:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? I don't have any faith that you can set aside your blinkers, sadly. You don't want to give up the insults. OK. Eh? If you think that's an insult you must be everso sensitive. In the meantime, there is nothing remotely insulting in pointing out that someone who is too dangerous, too stupid or too lacking in skills (singly or in any combination) to have a driving licence is still fully qualified to ride a bike. Ah, here we go again. Which bit of it was the slightest bit inaccurate? Perhaps that should not be the legal situation. But it is. I hear you say it's all about Legalities not about Safety. Then let me expand it a little in order to accommodate your reasonable concern. Someone who is too anti-social (even sociopathic) and far too prone to causing danger on the roads to be trusted with a driving licence is nevertheless deemed safe enough to be a cyclist. I'm sure you're trolling, but have you never heard of momentum? These large metal boxes that you seem so keen to promote can cause serious injury and death if not used properly - society handles this by requiring various standards [of manufacture, maintenence and care when driving] to be met; the danger from a cycle is much, much less. Got it? What has any of it got to do with the fact that arrogant, dangerous, sociopathic, unlicensed scofflaw chavs are not allowed (by law) to drive or ride a motor vehicle but are fully qualified to ride bikes? As we unfortunately see in news reported today, bikes too can cause serious injury and death if not used properly. Even more unfortunately, those injuries, serious and/or fatal, are often caused to innocent pedestrians, usually with the culprit either scarpering into the sunset (and pretending that they don't know that the police have asked them to come forward) or hanging around to blame the victim. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On 13/07/2020 12:27, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:22:42 GMT, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 21:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? I don't have any faith that you can set aside your blinkers, sadly. You don't want to give up the insults. OK. Eh? If you think that's an insult you must be everso sensitive. In the meantime, there is nothing remotely insulting in pointing out that someone who is too dangerous, too stupid or too lacking in skills (singly or in any combination) to have a driving licence is still fully qualified to ride a bike. Ah, here we go again. Which bit of it was the slightest bit inaccurate? None of it, obviously. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On 13/07/2020 12:27, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 21:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? I don't have any faith that you can set aside your blinkers, sadly. You don't want to give up the insults. OK. Eh? If you think that's an insult you must be everso sensitive. You miss the point by some distance. I was referring to the sulytured insults ("cagers", "moronists", "car-promoters", etc), besides which anything I have said has always been exeptionally mild. You *could* have agreed that those terms are unacceptably childish and unhelpful. But you have chosen (so far) not to do so. But I don't condemn you for that - perhaps it was a genuine misunderstanding on your part. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Road rage incident near Haverhill sparks police hunt for cyclist
On 14/07/2020 00:11, JNugent wrote:
On 13/07/2020 12:27, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 21:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2020 11:36, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: JNugent wrote: [] So you were one of the obstructive fairy-cycle riders, were you? Is this your new insult-of-choice; given up on the "fully qualified cyclist" mantra? Are you (and maybe more to the point, certain others) going to take the same huff about terms such as "cagers", "moronists", etc? If you were to do that, we could start getting somewhere, couldn't we? I don't have any faith that you can set aside your blinkers, sadly. You don't want to give up the insults. OK. Eh? If you think that's an insult you must be everso sensitive. You miss the point by some distance. I was referring to the sulytured insults ("cagers", "moronists", "car-promoters", etc), besides which anything I have said has always been exeptionally mild. Sorry - that should (obviously) have read: "cultured". You *could* have agreed that those terms are unacceptably childish and unhelpful. But you have chosen (so far) not to do so. But I don't condemn you for that - perhaps it was a genuine misunderstanding on your part. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Police hunt road rage cyclist | MrCheerful | UK | 4 | January 7th 19 01:03 PM |
Police hunt road rage cyclist after attack on a motorist | MrCheerful | UK | 3 | July 10th 18 01:09 AM |
Police hunt yet another road rage cyclist | Mrcheerful | UK | 126 | October 19th 15 07:57 PM |
Police hunt road rage cyclist after attack on bus driver | Mrcheerful | UK | 1 | July 17th 14 06:44 PM |
Police hunt road rage cyclist in Cambridge | Mrcheerful | UK | 5 | March 27th 14 09:38 AM |