|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On 5/21/2011 10:54 AM, Anton Berlin wrote:
On May 21, 10:19 am, Fred Flintstein wrote: On 5/21/2011 9:34 AM, Anton Berlin wrote: Dumbass - I was contacted by SCA attorneys. I can assure you doping was a pertinent and majority part of the conversation. Ummm, the guy that rendered the judgment disagreed. Whose opinion counted more? Dumbass? F PS If you repeat the same arguments over and over, surely at some point they will be correct, eh? Don't you feel uncomfortable being a grown man and being obsessively in love with another man ? Why does Lance's innocence influence your masturbation fantasies so thoroughly? Creepy dumbass, I am quite certain that LANCE doped. I am also quite certain that your infatuation with him is without peer except for Laff. F |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On May 21, 11:03*am, "Mike Jacoubowsky"
wrote: SCA, Jesus ****ing Christ! Dope wasn't relevant to the contract. Thus lying about dope isn't perjury. But you know that. If you google 'legal definition of fraud' you'll find the, um, legal definition of fraud. Check it out. F PS And if they get him for possession I certainly hope someone in the FDA hierarchy has an uncomfortable discussion with Novitsky about the proper use of scarce law enforcement resources. Especially since they aren't ****ing likely to get him for possession a decade after the fact. ======= Dumbass - I was contacted by SCA attorneys. *I can assure you doping was a pertinent and majority part of the conversation. ======= Could you elaborate on that? It didn't seem to have anything to do with the final decision in the case. Do you think it was just posturing, an attempt to rattle people? Maybe something like Greg LeMond did when he threatened Trek with public disclosure of everything-Lance and various internal discussions, something that Trek negated by disclosing everything first (the "nuclear" option). Maybe SCA figured that Lance would drop the lawsuit under the threat of negative publicity? --Mike-- * * Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com Mainly questions surrounding my experience at the OTC with the coaches that Lance later had. Questions about his teammates and statements they had made on training rides. A lot of other specifics that I can't recall or don't wish to talk about now. I still have friends out there. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On 5/20/2011 7:18 PM, Anton Berlin wrote:
On May 20, 9:14 pm, Substance wrote: On 5/20/2011 9:25 AM, Fred Flintstein wrote: On 5/20/2011 10:22 AM, Anton Berlin wrote: On May 20, 10:18 am, Fred Flintstein wrote: On 5/20/2011 9:53 AM, Choppy Warburton wrote: On May 20, 9:03 am, Fred wrote: On 5/20/2011 8:34 AM, wrote: The Uniballer's PR man, Fabio, is already spinning the the greed motive for Tyler, but it simply isn't going to fly at this point. Too many former associated are biting the snake's tail. Once it comes out in an indictment that the alleged TdS positive was covered up, Armstrong will be dead in the water. Dumbass, Is doping to win a bike race illegal? F It's not about the doped up cyclist on a bike dumbass. Racketeering, fraud, money laundering and a host of other crimes are. Then how is covering up a TdS positive relevant? And is selling bikes on ebay illegal? F You're being obtuse. Read the god damn criminal code and get your head out of your ass. Your faggy obsession is clouding your judgment. And yes conversion (aka theft by deception) is a crime. Neither you nor Laff can tell me what he did that was illegal. Both of you guys are falling back on HE-DID-REALLY-BAD-STUFF as a description of his alleged offense. Don't it bother you to be on the same side of this as someone like Lafferty? Using the same tactic? Aren't you going to tell us that time will tell? F Your point is valid and reasonable, but it doesn't take prosecutor creativity into account. They will find the things they can prove and try to find a way to shoe horn them into the criminal code as best they can. Predicting whether that'll work or not is another matter but it's obscenely likely that they will try. His point isn't "valid and reasonable". if you take the time to read this you will learn that the average citizen is committing felonies and misdemeanors nearly every day. It's just that most of us don't get caught. When you say "if you take the time to read this...", what does "this" refer to? I don't see a link. It is reasonable to recognize that the prosecutors are not a bunch of fanboys and amateurs. The fanboys and amateurs arguing this in RBR are not familiar with neither the evidence nor the law. Where you and I differ is that I include you and Lafferty in the list of fanboys and amateurs. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
When you say "if you take the time to read this...", what does "this" refer to? I don't see a link. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/71...sup_01_18.html |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
In article
, Anton Berlin wrote: [...] Dumbass - I was contacted by SCA attorneys. I can assure you doping was a pertinent and majority part of the conversation. This is the definition of clutching at straws. -- Old Fritz |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
Anton Berlin wrote:
However, Lance is getting caught. Fred Flintstein wrote: Doing what? Frederick the Great wrote: Cavorting with B list celebrities. He should raise his sights and go on dancing with the stars. Fred Flintstein wrote: Just like the Amstel, he wouldn't be able to beat Boogerd. Does dancing have an equivalent of sitting a wheel and sprinting at the end ? In that case Bruyneel might have an outside chance too. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ?
On 05/20/11 13:53, Anton Berlin wrote:
Riding the 60 minutes tsunami ? Oh well there's always next Tuesday. Or Tuesday the 29th of February. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Almost missed 'cuz it's not a Tuesday! | Mike Jacoubowsky | Racing | 7 | May 20th 11 11:22 PM |
island lake on tuesday | rab2009 | Unicycling | 4 | August 28th 07 05:55 AM |
Super Tuesday Counts | flyingdutch | Australia | 7 | February 12th 07 05:06 AM |
Brisbane Ride Tuesday 27/9 | LotteBum | Australia | 17 | September 27th 05 09:34 AM |
Tuesday will be Horner's Day | Ken Prager | Racing | 8 | July 20th 05 08:47 PM |