|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
Before I start, I realise this is very subjective, but here goes.
Surly Karate Monkey frame, with a Rohloff on 700c wheels (yeah, so shoot me), gives a gearing of this; Front 48T Rear 16T Wheel D 69cm[1] Gear Ratio Gearing cms 1 0.28 181.44 2 0.32 205.50 3 0.36 234.11 4 0.41 265.98 5 0.46 301.74 6 0.53 343.36 7 0.60 390.19 8 0.68 443.51 9 0.77 503.34 10 0.88 572.92 11 1.00 650.31 12 1.14 738.10 13 1.29 840.20 14 1.47 954.00 Bike used for a bit of cinder tracking and the odd hill. Normal riding uses mostly gear 7/8. Hills require 1-3. I rarely use more than 11, *never* the top gear. I'm going to change that 48 for a 42, anyone any comments or think this is a widely high gearing I have? [1] No, I didn't chalk the tyres, but a 90kg lump on it and carefully push it over smooth tarmac. I took a tape measure from edge-to-edge and this is about it! |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
in message , Tosspot
') wrote: Before I start, I realise this is very subjective, but here goes. Surly Karate Monkey frame, with a Rohloff on 700c wheels (yeah, so shoot me), gives a gearing of this; Front 48T Rear 16T Wheel D 69cm[1] Gear Ratio Gearing cms 1 0.28 181.44 2 0.32 205.50 3 0.36 234.11 4 0.41 265.98 5 0.46 301.74 6 0.53 343.36 7 0.60 390.19 8 0.68 443.51 9 0.77 503.34 10 0.88 572.92 11 1.00 650.31 12 1.14 738.10 13 1.29 840.20 14 1.47 954.00 Bike used for a bit of cinder tracking and the odd hill. Normal riding uses mostly gear 7/8. Hills require 1-3. I rarely use more than 11, *never* the top gear. I'm going to change that 48 for a 42, anyone any comments or think this is a widely high gearing I have? If your figures are correct, your gearing currently has a low gear close to the highest gear of a standard racing road bike setup, and a high gear more than three times as high as the highest gear on a standard road racing setup. However, Sheldon Brown says you're wrong: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/internal.html He says your top gear is currently 297cm (116 inches) and your bottom currently 56.89cm (22.5 inches). These are still definitely in the racing range; changing to a 42 tooth chainring would give you a range from 50cm (19.6 inches) to 261.62 cm (103 inches) which is more similar to a normal mountain bike range. -- (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/ ;; Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
Simon Brooke wrote:
in message , Tosspot ') wrote: Before I start, I realise this is very subjective, but here goes. Surly Karate Monkey frame, with a Rohloff on 700c wheels (yeah, so shoot me), gives a gearing of this; Front 48T Rear 16T Wheel D 69cm[1] Gear Ratio Gearing cms 1 0.28 181.44 2 0.32 205.50 3 0.36 234.11 4 0.41 265.98 5 0.46 301.74 6 0.53 343.36 7 0.60 390.19 8 0.68 443.51 9 0.77 503.34 10 0.88 572.92 11 1.00 650.31 12 1.14 738.10 13 1.29 840.20 14 1.47 954.00 Bike used for a bit of cinder tracking and the odd hill. Normal riding uses mostly gear 7/8. Hills require 1-3. I rarely use more than 11, *never* the top gear. I'm going to change that 48 for a 42, anyone any comments or think this is a widely high gearing I have? If your figures are correct, your gearing currently has a low gear close to the highest gear of a standard racing road bike setup, and a high gear more than three times as high as the highest gear on a standard road racing setup. However, Sheldon Brown says you're wrong: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/internal.html He says your top gear is currently 297cm (116 inches) and your bottom currently 56.89cm (22.5 inches). These are still definitely in the racing range; changing to a 42 tooth chainring would give you a range from 50cm (19.6 inches) to 261.62 cm (103 inches) which is more similar to a normal mountain bike range. It depends on how the gearing is expressed. Metric gear sizes are usually metres development so straight conversion doesn't equate to gear inches which is the equivalent diameter of wheel. Putting 48 and 42 chainrings into Sheldon's calulator with atypical 700C wheel gives: For 700 X 32 / 32-622 tire and 16 tooth sprocket 48 / 16 42 / 16 1.467 9.5 8.3 13.5 % 1.292 8.4 7.3 13.8 % 1.135 7.4 6.4 13.5 % 1 6.5 5.7 13.5 % ..881 5.7 5.0 13.8 % ..774 5.0 4.4 13.5 % ..682 4.4 3.9 13.7 % ..600 3.9 3.4 13.6 % ..528 3.4 3.0 13.8 % ..464 3.0 2.6 13.4 % ..409 2.7 2.3 13.6 % ..360 2.3 2.0 13.9 % ..316 2.0 1.8 13.3 % ..279 1.8 1.6 With Rohloff Speedhub 14-speed Hub Or in gear inches For 700 X 32 / 32-622 tire and 16 tooth sprocket 48 / 16 42 / 16 1.467 118.8 104.0 13.5 % 1.292 104.7 91.6 13.8 % 1.135 91.9 80.4 13.5 % 1 81.0 70.9 13.5 % ..881 71.4 62.4 13.8 % ..774 62.7 54.9 13.5 % ..682 55.2 48.3 13.7 % ..600 48.6 42.5 13.6 % ..528 42.8 37.4 13.8 % ..464 37.6 32.9 13.4 % ..409 33.1 29.0 13.6 % ..360 29.2 25.5 13.9 % ..316 25.6 22.4 13.3 % ..279 22.6 19.8 With Rohloff Speedhub 14-speed Hub I would say that the 48 is a little overgeared. Dropping to a 42 is the quivalent of dropping a gear step and looks eminently sensible to me with a top gear equivalent to something between 52x13/14 which you are only ever going to use when going downhill or with a srong wind behind you. I can't imagine ever using the top gear provided by the 48 tooth ring. -- Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
Simon Brooke wrote:
in message , Tosspot ') wrote: Before I start, I realise this is very subjective, but here goes. Surly Karate Monkey frame, with a Rohloff on 700c wheels (yeah, so shoot me), gives a gearing of this; Front 48T Rear 16T Wheel D 69cm[1] Gear Ratio Gearing cms 1 0.28 181.44 2 0.32 205.50 3 0.36 234.11 4 0.41 265.98 5 0.46 301.74 6 0.53 343.36 7 0.60 390.19 8 0.68 443.51 9 0.77 503.34 10 0.88 572.92 11 1.00 650.31 12 1.14 738.10 13 1.29 840.20 14 1.47 954.00 Bike used for a bit of cinder tracking and the odd hill. Normal riding uses mostly gear 7/8. Hills require 1-3. I rarely use more than 11, *never* the top gear. I'm going to change that 48 for a 42, anyone any comments or think this is a widely high gearing I have? If your figures are correct, your gearing currently has a low gear close to the highest gear of a standard racing road bike setup, and a high gear more than three times as high as the highest gear on a standard road racing setup. However, Sheldon Brown says you're wrong: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/internal.html He says your top gear is currently 297cm (116 inches) and your bottom currently 56.89cm (22.5 inches). These are still definitely in the racing range; changing to a 42 tooth chainring would give you a range from 50cm (19.6 inches) to 261.62 cm (103 inches) which is more similar to a normal mountain bike range. Ummm...I might have fscked it up, but the spreadsheet looks ok to me, albeit in cms cos that's what I had on my tape measure So it's (WD*PI)*(FS/RS)* Ratio Where WD=Wheel Diameter, FS=Front Sprocket(Teeth), RS=Rear Sprocket(Teeth) and Ratio is the multiplier for the given gear on the Rohloff. Given a 26.91" wheel gives 70" for the lowest gear, 152" for gear 7 and 372" for gear 14. confused I've done something wrong haven't I? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
Phil Cook wrote:
Simon Brooke wrote: in message , Tosspot ') wrote: Before I start, I realise this is very subjective, but here goes. Surly Karate Monkey frame, with a Rohloff on 700c wheels (yeah, so shoot me), gives a gearing of this; Front 48T Rear 16T Wheel D 69cm[1] Gear Ratio Gearing cms 1 0.28 181.44 2 0.32 205.50 3 0.36 234.11 4 0.41 265.98 5 0.46 301.74 6 0.53 343.36 7 0.60 390.19 8 0.68 443.51 9 0.77 503.34 10 0.88 572.92 11 1.00 650.31 12 1.14 738.10 13 1.29 840.20 14 1.47 954.00 Bike used for a bit of cinder tracking and the odd hill. Normal riding uses mostly gear 7/8. Hills require 1-3. I rarely use more than 11, *never* the top gear. I'm going to change that 48 for a 42, anyone any comments or think this is a widely high gearing I have? If your figures are correct, your gearing currently has a low gear close to the highest gear of a standard racing road bike setup, and a high gear more than three times as high as the highest gear on a standard road racing setup. However, Sheldon Brown says you're wrong: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/internal.html He says your top gear is currently 297cm (116 inches) and your bottom currently 56.89cm (22.5 inches). These are still definitely in the racing range; changing to a 42 tooth chainring would give you a range from 50cm (19.6 inches) to 261.62 cm (103 inches) which is more similar to a normal mountain bike range. It depends on how the gearing is expressed. Metric gear sizes are usually metres development so straight conversion doesn't equate to gear inches which is the equivalent diameter of wheel. Putting 48 and 42 chainrings into Sheldon's calulator with atypical 700C wheel gives: For 700 X 32 / 32-622 tire and 16 tooth sprocket 48 / 16 42 / 16 1.467 9.5 8.3 13.5 % 1.292 8.4 7.3 13.8 % 1.135 7.4 6.4 13.5 % 1 6.5 5.7 13.5 % .881 5.7 5.0 13.8 % .774 5.0 4.4 13.5 % .682 4.4 3.9 13.7 % .600 3.9 3.4 13.6 % .528 3.4 3.0 13.8 % .464 3.0 2.6 13.4 % .409 2.7 2.3 13.6 % .360 2.3 2.0 13.9 % .316 2.0 1.8 13.3 % .279 1.8 1.6 With Rohloff Speedhub 14-speed Hub Or in gear inches For 700 X 32 / 32-622 tire and 16 tooth sprocket 48 / 16 42 / 16 1.467 118.8 104.0 13.5 % 1.292 104.7 91.6 13.8 % 1.135 91.9 80.4 13.5 % 1 81.0 70.9 13.5 % .881 71.4 62.4 13.8 % .774 62.7 54.9 13.5 % .682 55.2 48.3 13.7 % .600 48.6 42.5 13.6 % .528 42.8 37.4 13.8 % .464 37.6 32.9 13.4 % .409 33.1 29.0 13.6 % .360 29.2 25.5 13.9 % .316 25.6 22.4 13.3 % .279 22.6 19.8 With Rohloff Speedhub 14-speed Hub I would say that the 48 is a little overgeared. Dropping to a 42 is the quivalent of dropping a gear step and looks eminently sensible to me with a top gear equivalent to something between 52x13/14 which you are only ever going to use when going downhill or with a srong wind behind you. I can't imagine ever using the top gear provided by the 48 tooth ring. phew That's what I thought, the whole shebang is over geared. I was just looking for confirmation that 42 tooth was a ball park figure for the front. Thanks for the help. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
"Tosspot" a écrit:
Surly Karate Monkey frame, with a Rohloff on 700c wheels (yeah, so shoot me), gives a gearing of this; Bike used for a bit of cinder tracking and the odd hill. Normal riding uses mostly gear 7/8. Hills require 1-3. I rarely use more than 11, *never* the top gear. Whatever you end up doing, I'd pay particular attention to *not* spending too much time in gear 7, or making the shift from 7 to 8 too often. 7th gear is the least efficient, and the 7-8 shift is the least smooth. James Thomson |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
Simon Brooke wrote:
Sheldon Brownsays you're wrong: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/internal.html He says your top gear is currently 297cm (116 inches) and your bottom currently 56.89cm (22.5 inches). These are still definitely in the racing range; Actually, a 22.5 inch low gear is WAY lower than you would ever find on a racing bike. Tosspot wrote: Ummm...I might have fscked it up, but the spreadsheet looks ok to me, albeit in cms cos that's what I had on my tape measure So it's (WD*PI)*(FS/RS)* Ratio Where WD=Wheel Diameter, FS=Front Sprocket(Teeth), RS=Rear Sprocket(Teeth) and Ratio is the multiplier for the given gear on the Rohloff. Given a 26.91" wheel gives 70" for the lowest gear, 152" for gear 7 and 372" for gear 14. confused Â*I've done something wrong haven't I? Yep! It's Ï€. Ï€ doesn't come into calculation of gear inches, because that's a diameter based system. You do multiply by Ï€ when calculating development in metres (nobody uses centimetres for this.) The quick and easy conversion is: Gear inches X .08 = Metres Development. However, you might do even better to use my new system: Gain Ratios http://sheldonbrown.com/gain Sheldon "Gain Ratio" Brown +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Anyone who can't use a slide rule is a cultural illiterate, | | and should not be allowed to vote. --Robert A. Heinlein | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 http://harriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
in message , Tosspot
') wrote: Simon Brooke wrote: in message , Tosspot ') wrote: Before I start, I realise this is very subjective, but here goes. Surly Karate Monkey frame, with a Rohloff on 700c wheels (yeah, so shoot me), gives a gearing of this; Front 48T Rear 16T Wheel D 69cm[1] Gear Ratio Gearing cms 1 0.28 181.44 2 0.32 205.50 3 0.36 234.11 4 0.41 265.98 5 0.46 301.74 6 0.53 343.36 7 0.60 390.19 8 0.68 443.51 9 0.77 503.34 10 0.88 572.92 11 1.00 650.31 12 1.14 738.10 13 1.29 840.20 14 1.47 954.00 Bike used for a bit of cinder tracking and the odd hill. Normal riding uses mostly gear 7/8. Hills require 1-3. I rarely use more than 11, *never* the top gear. I'm going to change that 48 for a 42, anyone any comments or think this is a widely high gearing I have? If your figures are correct, your gearing currently has a low gear close to the highest gear of a standard racing road bike setup, and a high gear more than three times as high as the highest gear on a standard road racing setup. However, Sheldon Brown says you're wrong: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/internal.html He says your top gear is currently 297cm (116 inches) and your bottom currently 56.89cm (22.5 inches). These are still definitely in the racing range; changing to a 42 tooth chainring would give you a range from 50cm (19.6 inches) to 261.62 cm (103 inches) which is more similar to a normal mountain bike range. Ummm...I might have fscked it up, but the spreadsheet looks ok to me, albeit in cms cos that's what I had on my tape measure So it's (WD*PI)*(FS/RS)* Ratio Where WD=Wheel Diameter, FS=Front Sprocket(Teeth), RS=Rear Sprocket(Teeth) and Ratio is the multiplier for the given gear on the Rohloff. Given a 26.91" wheel gives 70" for the lowest gear, 152" for gear 7 and 372" for gear 14. confused I've done something wrong haven't I? It's conventional in the UK just to use the diameter, not the circumference, of the wheel to express the gear - dating back to the days of the 'ordinary' bicycle. I have to confess 'metres development' was a new one on me, so we've both learned something... -- (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/ ;; ... exposing the violence incoherent in the system... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gearing to high?
Tosspot wrote:
Ummm...I might have fscked it up, but the spreadsheet looks ok to me, albeit in cms cos that's what I had on my tape measure So it's (WD*PI)*(FS/RS)* Ratio Where WD=Wheel Diameter, FS=Front Sprocket(Teeth), RS=Rear Sprocket(Teeth) and Ratio is the multiplier for the given gear on the Rohloff. Given a 26.91" wheel gives 70" for the lowest gear, 152" for gear 7 and 372" for gear 14. confused I've done something wrong haven't I? It's the inclusion of Pi, that is none-standard (fsvo standards). Gear inches are usually expressed as relating to the _diameter_ of a penny-farthing (ordinary) front wheel, not the distance around the circumference. So, drop the Pi, and order will be restored. Other posters knew this, of course, but talking about 'three times the gearing' made them feel clever. All assistance short of actual help... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gearing | doceave | Unicycling | 16 | August 26th 06 05:26 PM |
gearing up a uni? | JUNGAUNI | Unicycling | 4 | May 7th 06 07:35 AM |
gearing up a uni? | Brian MacKenzie | Unicycling | 0 | May 7th 06 04:11 AM |
53 X 16 vs. 50 X 15 gearing | Steve Karpik | Techniques | 11 | September 16th 05 11:21 PM |
53/39/24 with 12-27 gearing. What do you think? | dennis | Techniques | 15 | September 10th 05 03:24 AM |