Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

In article ,
wrote:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

and two thirds of the republicans

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:25:42 -0700, Matt Stawicki
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?


Im sure he does. Its standard procedure for the Mind Numbed Democrats


"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich

In article ,
Gunner Asch wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:25:42 -0700, Matt Stawicki
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?


Im sure he does. Its standard procedure for the Mind Numbed Democrats


"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich

youre losing it

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?

Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we expect
anything different, now?
--
ah

In article s.com,
ah wrote:

Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?

Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we expect
anything different, now?

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?

Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we expect
anything different, now?

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

You can say that again, Bro-Sis.
--
ah

In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies
wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any
partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate sensibilities
of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no against the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's 40% of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them. Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?

Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should we
expect
anything different, now?

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

You can say that again, Bro-Sis.

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang