Philly Sucks

In article ,
Fred Fredburger wrote:

Tom Kunich wrote:

Now we see that the posters
themselves think that the object of this group is to make themselves
seem "cool".

Generally speaking, the number of people who aspire to dorkiness is a
lot lower than those who actually achieve it. RBR is that way too.

Took me five readings to understand the first sentence.
Still waiting for the penny to drop on the second.

--
Michael Press

Michael Press wrote:
In article ,
Fred Fredburger wrote:

Tom Kunich wrote:

Now we see that the posters
themselves think that the object of this group is to make themselves
seem "cool".
Generally speaking, the number of people who aspire to dorkiness is a
lot lower than those who actually achieve it. RBR is that way too.

Took me five readings to understand the first sentence.
Still waiting for the penny to drop on the second.


I was expecting someone to ARGUE the point, not prove it for me.

On Nov 7, 3:19*pm, "Paul G." wrote:
On Nov 7, 11:30*am, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

"Robert" wrote in message

.. .

Look, I agree times are a changing, but that doesn't mean I agree with the
changes, or that I will change with it, unless forced to by law. As for
Obama, we will see what he does or doesn't do in 4 years time.

It's pretty funny that he's picking insiders for everything. Looks like all
he was talking about was a lie. But that doesn't really surprise me.

He's picking an outstanding team. I wish him luck, he's gonna need it
considering the MESS he is inheriting from Bush and douchebags like
you.




Dumbass -


He has to pick insiders that understand how the relationships in DC
work. Otherwise he'll make the same mistakes that plagued Jimmy Carter
(another president elected on the premise of change).


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
On Nov 7, 3:19 pm, "Paul G." wrote:
On Nov 7, 11:30 am, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

"Robert" wrote in message
...
Look, I agree times are a changing, but that doesn't mean I agree with the
changes, or that I will change with it, unless forced to by law. As for
Obama, we will see what he does or doesn't do in 4 years time.
It's pretty funny that he's picking insiders for everything. Looks like all
he was talking about was a lie. But that doesn't really surprise me.
He's picking an outstanding team. I wish him luck, he's gonna need it
considering the MESS he is inheriting from Bush and douchebags like
you.




Dumbass -


He has to pick insiders that understand how the relationships in DC
work. Otherwise he'll make the same mistakes that plagued Jimmy Carter
(another president elected on the premise of change).

Dumbass,

It would be better if he would pick some Mavericks to go around doing
Mavricky things. Lots of Mavericky things apparently need to be done,
how can he get them done without Mavericks?

Ya know?

William Asher wrote:

I don't think it's so much that we don't like humor. It's more that most
of us are simply not very funny unless we're trying to be serious.

I agree, but most of us are pretty boring when we're trying to be
serious. There's a large disconnect here.

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
He has to pick insiders that understand how the relationships in DC
work. Otherwise he'll make the same mistakes that plagued Jimmy Carter
(another president elected on the premise of change).

Fred Fredburger wrote:
It would be better if he would pick some Mavericks to go around doing
Mavricky things. Lots of Mavericky things apparently need to be done, how
can he get them done without Mavericks?

Better than a hummer I suppose:
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/4973-1970-Ford-Maverick.jpg

Donald Munro wrote:
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
He has to pick insiders that understand how the relationships in DC
work. Otherwise he'll make the same mistakes that plagued Jimmy Carter
(another president elected on the premise of change).

Fred Fredburger wrote:
It would be better if he would pick some Mavericks to go around doing
Mavricky things. Lots of Mavericky things apparently need to be done, how
can he get them done without Mavericks?

Better than a hummer I suppose:
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/4973-1970-Ford-Maverick.jpg


I saw one of those just yesterday, sans hood scoop! It was pristine,
almost show room condition! It was being driven by an old lady who was
pulling in to the senior center parking lot a couple blocks from my
house. It was stunning. I still see these from time to time, but they're
mostly rust buckets.

I'm betting that when the old lady dies, the car will be inherited by
ungrateful great grandkids and it'll look like hell by the time 2012
rolls around.

On Nov 8, 12:12*am, Donald Munro wrote:
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
He has to pick insiders that understand how the relationships in DC
work. Otherwise he'll make the same mistakes that plagued Jimmy Carter
(another president elected on the premise of change).
Fred Fredburger wrote:
It would be better if he would pick some Mavericks to go around doing
Mavricky things. Lots of Mavericky things apparently need to be done, how
can he get them done without Mavericks?

Better than a hummer I suppose:
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/4973-1970-Ford-Maverick.jpg

You obviously haven't had a proper hummer...
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hummer
-Paul

Dumbass,

The Tampa Bay Rays


"Fred Fredburger" wrote in
message ...
wrote:
they did win the world series.

oh yeah, that was the one that nobody watched. how cruel!

who did they play again?


The Tampa Bay Devil Rays.