|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On 10 Sep 2004 03:13:35 GMT, Tom Paterson wrote:
wheel crossing is pretty common in early categories. And the women's Olympic road race. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Chris wrote:
I find it amusing the only a very small percentage of drugs on the banned drug list have any chance at enhancing performance. But they do enhance pounding Dickheads ego. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Benjamin Weiner wrote:
Don't worry much about your bike, or food since it's a short crit (beyond common sense, i.e. don't show up hungry or dehydrated). Just make sure you don't eat any Spanish fish salad. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Ewoud Dronkert wrote:
Or take the "overview from behind" approach. Most fields inevitably stay together until the end, with some futile escapes. Start your race in the penultimate lap. Jeff Jones wrote: I have tried that tactic many times in Belgium. By the penultimate lap, there are so many bits of the peloton that if I've taken the "sitting on" approach I'll be lucky to finish inside the top 30. Does the wind play a big role in splitting up the field in Belgium, or is it 'just' hard racing with lots of break aways (I have heard that Belgians and Dutch sometimes use a 42 inner chainring instead of a 39 for when the wind is really bad). I've realised the only tactic that works is to try to get in as many breaks as possible,tempered by some racing instinct e.g. "Mario Willems is still in the peloton. I'll wait." A bunch sprint for the win is almost unheard of in Belgian amateur racing. I'd have thought a top placed journalist racer like you would have been watching the other Italian Mario. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:41:11 +0200, Donald Munro wrote:
(I have heard that Belgians and Dutch sometimes use a 42 inner chainring instead of a 39 for when the wind is really bad). Sometimes? Because most new bikes come with a 39 by default nowadays, and most rec racers don't bother, they mostly have a 39, yes. First replacement is often the casette, 12-21 in stead of 11-25. Then the inner chain ring to 42, or 47/48 for "real" racers. But that's less important because experienced riders know a) you don't use the inner chainring in races, and b) *if* you do, you know you lost anyway. For me, the 39 comes out of storage only for the Ardennes or the Alpes. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Donald Munro wrote:
(I have heard that Belgians and Dutch sometimes use a 42 inner chainring instead of a 39 for when the wind is really bad). Ewoud Dronkert wrote: Sometimes? Because most new bikes come with a 39 by default nowadays, and most rec racers don't bother, they mostly have a 39, yes. First replacement is often the casette, 12-21 in stead of 11-25. Then the inner chain ring to 42, or 47/48 for "real" racers. But that's less important because experienced riders know a) you don't use the inner chainring in races, and b) *if* you do, you know you lost anyway. I was thinking more in terms of training than racing, however in a really strong (ie 50Km/h) the wind resistance could have the same effect as going uphill (at least if you are in a breakaway and riding in the wind more frequently). Perhaps using the 42 at a higher cadence could save your legs a bit (ie 42x14=79.3 53x18=77.8' 42x15=74' and 42x11 still gives you a 100.9'gear approx = 53x14). For me, the 39 comes out of storage only for the Ardennes or the Alpes. And a medium cage rear derailleur for the Alps ? :-) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Donald Munro wrote:
I was thinking more in terms of training than racing, however in a really strong (ie 50Km/h) the wind resistance could have the same effect as going uphill (at least if you are in a breakaway and riding in the wind more frequently). Perhaps using the 42 at a higher cadence could save your legs a bit (ie 42x14=79.3 53x18=77.8' 42x15=74' and 42x11 still gives you a 100.9'gear approx = 53x14). Wind resistance doesn't scale like going uphill. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Donald Munro wrote:
I was thinking more in terms of training than racing, however in a really strong (ie 50Km/h) the wind resistance could have the same effect as going uphill (at least if you are in a breakaway and riding in the wind more frequently). Perhaps using the 42 at a higher cadence could save your legs a bit (ie 42x14=79.3 53x18=77.8' 42x15=74' and 42x11 still gives you a 100.9'gear approx = 53x14). Robert Chung wrote: Wind resistance doesn't scale like going uphill. I don't know how it scales, but grinding a big gear into a strong headwind is pretty hard on the legs (I know, I live at the coast around latitude 34S close enough to the 'roaring forties' as to have more than my fill of westerly gales to ride into, although it does provide for motorless motor pacing if you are going slightly downhill the other way). |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:03:27 +1000, "Jeff Jones"
jeff@cyclingnews-punt-com wrote: but in a kermis it's really just the number of attacks that destroys the peloton. The attacks start from the beginning and usually you get several groups of 8-10 forming, separated by various intervals. It's quite often that the winning selection is made on the first lap, as long as it has the right people in it. But if the bunch is big enough ( 50) then an hour of hard chasing will generally bring things back together. Then it starts all over again. What I find mentally hard about it is that when you do get into a break, *no-one* wants to work, and invariably things fall apart and your effort is wasted. It seems that everyone wants to attack but no-one wants to go on with it exccept in rare cases. If you can get into a group that works together, then you're almost guaranteed of a place. It is is very demoralising, as one moment you're out in front and the next, everyone in the group has slowed to 30 km/h and are looking back at the bunch. Then the counter-attacks come from the bunch and you're suddenly at or off the back. Kermis racing is like repeatedly bashing your head against a wall. A former teammate of mine described the same thing. He said he got the feeling everyone wanted to cross the finish line alone. JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:42:33 +0200, Ewoud Dronkert
wrote: On 10 Sep 2004 03:13:35 GMT, Tom Paterson wrote: wheel crossing is pretty common in early categories. And the women's Olympic road race. Wheel crossing is common at a lot of ability levels. At the higher levels it doesn't result in as many crashes though... JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RR: first SS race (long-ish) | MattB | Mountain Biking | 4 | May 20th 04 10:14 PM |
Race Report. | Roger Buchanan | Mountain Biking | 0 | April 29th 04 02:03 PM |
OK, I should write up a RR (Race Report)- and here it is. | miles todd | Mountain Biking | 1 | March 2nd 04 09:23 PM |
24 hour solo mtb race advice? | Me | Mountain Biking | 4 | December 28th 03 05:01 AM |