"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"

Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers.

http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx

On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote:
Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers.

http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx


Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially
cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly
it is getting worse.

Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News
news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise
10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased,
according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop
has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate,
Surrey, at about 2am and died ...


--
Bod

On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote:

On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote:

Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers.

http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx

Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially
cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly
it is getting worse.

Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News
news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise
10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased,
according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop
has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate,
Surrey, at about 2am and died ...

Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is?

Yes / No [delete as appropriate]

If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote:

On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote:

Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers.

http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx


Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially
cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly
it is getting worse.

Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News
news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise
10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased,
according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop
has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate,
Surrey, at about 2am and died ...

Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is?

Yes / No [delete as appropriate]

If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly
obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission.
For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low
life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast
majority are caused by vehicles.
Do you deny this fact?


--
Bod

On 09/06/2016 11:06, Bod wrote:

On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote:

Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers.

http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx

Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially
cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly
it is getting worse.
Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News
news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise
10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased,
according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop
has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate,
Surrey, at about 2am and died ...

Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is?

Yes / No [delete as appropriate]

If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly
obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission.
For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low
life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast
majority are caused by vehicles.
Do you deny this fact?

Don't evade the question.

Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"?

On 09/06/2016 11:19, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 11:06, Bod wrote:

On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote:

Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers.

http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx


Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially
cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and
sadly
it is getting worse.
Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News
news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise
10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased,
according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop
has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate,
Surrey, at about 2am and died ...

Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is?

Yes / No [delete as appropriate]

If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly
obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission.
For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low
life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast
majority are caused by vehicles.
Do you deny this fact?

Don't evade the question.

Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"?


You are very obtuse (thick, if you like).

Try and read again: "*Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as
a low life" obviously means, *they are *all* scum *equally* and *all*
includes vehicles AND cyclists*.








--
Bod

On 09/06/2016 11:30, Bod wrote:

On 09/06/2016 11:19, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 11:06, Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote:

Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers.

http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx

Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially
cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and
sadly it is getting worse.
Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News
news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise
10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has
increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver
did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a
car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ...

Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is?
Yes / No [delete as appropriate]
If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly
obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission.
For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low
life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast
majority are caused by vehicles.
Do you deny this fact?

Don't evade the question.
Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"?

You are very obtuse (thick, if you like).
Try and read again: "*Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as
a low life" obviously means, *they are *all* scum *equally* and *all*
includes vehicles AND cyclists*.

Step back and calm down for a few seconds. Then ask yourself whether it
is REALLY necessary to lard every condemnation of a chav law-breaking
cyclist with a contrived get-out clause to the effect that some other
people are just as bad?

It doesn't MATTER what other people do. There is absolutely no need to
try to spread that cyclist's wrongdoing onto others.

Try it again. It's easy.

Just condemn that cyclist without mentioning anyone else. Just like you
would a driver who was the subject of such a story.

Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote:

If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly
obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission.

So why continue to deal with him?

--
john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons)
'It never gets any easier. You just get faster'
(Greg LeMond (1961 - ))

10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has
increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver
did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a
car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ...

Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is?
Yes / No [delete as appropriate]
If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly
obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission.
For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low
life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the
vast
majority are caused by vehicles.
Do you deny this fact?

Don't evade the question.
Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"?

You are very obtuse (thick, if you like).
Try and read again: "*Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as
a low life" obviously means, *they are *all* scum *equally* and *all*
includes vehicles AND cyclists*.

Step back and calm down for a few seconds. Then ask yourself whether it
is REALLY necessary to lard every condemnation of a chav law-breaking
cyclist with a contrived get-out clause to the effect that some other
people are just as bad?

It doesn't MATTER what other people do. There is absolutely no need to
try to spread that cyclist's wrongdoing onto others.

Try it again. It's easy.

Just condemn that cyclist without mentioning anyone else. Just like you
would a driver who was the subject of such a story.


You will now be known to me as *The Wriggler*.


--
Bod

On 09/06/2016 11:54, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote:

If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it?

Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly
obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission.

So why continue to deal with him?

I find *The Wriggler's* replies as highly amusing ramblings of a sad
case. He reminds me of nutters that stand on street corners shouting at
cyclists amongst the traffic.

--
Bod