Cyclist attacked driver

Guess what? Male cyclist, female driver.

http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/ne...ys_into_hedge/

On 26/11/2013 16:50, Mrcheerful wrote:

http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/ne...ys_into_hedge/

Guess what? Male cyclist, female driver.

Par for the course.

"JNugent" wrote in message
...
On 26/11/2013 16:50, Mrcheerful wrote:

http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/ne...ys_into_hedge/

Guess what? Male cyclist, female driver.

Par for the course.

Cowards, one and all.

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:01:25 -0000, JNugent wrote:

On 26/11/2013 16:50, Mrcheerful wrote:

http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/ne...ys_into_hedge/

Guess what? Male cyclist, female driver.

Par for the course.

Correct, female drivers are useless, and so are van drivers. Put the two together and the cyclist is lucky not to have been run down.

--
Paddy and his wife are lying in bed and the neighbours' dog is barking like mad in the garden.
Paddy says "To hell with this!" and storms off.
He comes back upstairs 5 minutes later and his wife asks "What did you do?"
Paddy replies "I've put the dog in our garden. Let's see how they like it!"

On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:01:00 UTC, Gefreiter Krueger wrote:

Correct, female drivers are useless, and so are van drivers. Put the two together and the cyclist is lucky not to have been run down.

That's a plausible reason that Jim, Cheerless and mental case would never consider.

wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:01:00 UTC, Gefreiter Krueger wrote:

Correct, female drivers are useless, and so are van drivers. Put the two
together and the cyclist is lucky not to have been run down.

That's a plausible reason

For what?

On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 12:12:41 UTC, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:01:00 UTC, Gefreiter Krueger wrote:

Correct, female drivers are useless, and so are van drivers. Put the two
together and the cyclist is lucky not to have been run down.

That's a plausible reason

For what?

For the altercation of course, what else?

wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 12:12:41 UTC, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:01:00 UTC, Gefreiter Krueger wrote:

Correct, female drivers are useless, and so are van drivers. Put the
two
together and the cyclist is lucky not to have been run down.

That's a plausible reason

For what?

For the altercation of course, what else?

So it's OK to assault someone and throw their belongings into hedges because
they're a woman driving a van?

On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 12:44:00 UTC, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 12:12:41 UTC, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

wrote in message



...



On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:01:00 UTC, Gefreiter Krueger wrote:



Correct, female drivers are useless, and so are van drivers. Put the
two
together and the cyclist is lucky not to have been run down.

That's a plausible reason

For what?

For the altercation of course, what else?

So it's OK to assault someone and throw their belongings into hedges because
they're a woman driving a van?

If you're going to put words into my mouth, you'll need a spoon.

wrote in message
...

On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 12:44:00 UTC, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Wednesday, 27 November 2013 12:12:41 UTC, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

wrote in message



...



On Tuesday, 26 November 2013 20:01:00 UTC, Gefreiter Krueger wrote:



Correct, female drivers are useless, and so are van drivers. Put
the
two
together and the cyclist is lucky not to have been run down.

That's a plausible reason

For what?

For the altercation of course, what else?

So it's OK to assault someone and throw their belongings into hedges
because
they're a woman driving a van?

If you're going to put words into my mouth, you'll need a spoon.

I would say a shovel would be more appropriate.