|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
"Judith" wrote in message ... On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 22:13:12 +0000, Bertie Wooster wrote: snip Just 0.045% of offences are committed by cyclists. http://www.usenet-replayer.com/faq/u...ersurfers.html Hello and Goodbye from me! Earlier this year I posted to this newsgroup about disabled discrimination on Haverhill Town Council. It was on this newsgroup that I met legend and warrior Peter Turtill, slayer of trolls and champion of the disabled... I salute you sir. It was here on this newsgroup that I met a beast of a troll called Anthony Bournes, a racist, gay-bashing, naturist with a fondness to have sex with handicapped children. A man who spends most of his life posting to a couple of dead newsgroups on the internet, talking to himself via his many sock puppets and having fantasies about having sex with me, Peter Turtill or with disabled children. A nasty unhappy creature is Anthony Bournes, a low creature that infests Andover and the real life equivalent of Golum in Lord of Rings, except more pathetic. His "precious" is not his wife or daughter, who I am told hate him, but something small that he yanks out and rubs the moment someone mentions me, Turtill or disabled children. Anthony Bournes has given probation officers, the police and CPS a real headache in his obsession, and it is surprising someone has not sectioned him yet under the mental health act. Perhaps one day this mental case will be locked up for his own safety with his stunted "precious" to keep him company. I have asked is it worth going after this pathetic creature called Anthony Bournes through the courts. He is old, mentally disabled and nothing more than worthless trash, not worth wasting any more of my life on. So I will not waste any more time on this piece of rubbish, however I will post on h2009.com a full article on this troll called Anthony Bournes, so that Peter Turtill can post a link to it to warn other people about this Bournes vermin. To Peter Turtill. It has been an honour knowing you. Likewise, Bournes has tried to paint a negative picture of you, but your strength and honour shines forth like a blazing sun and chases away any of the shadows that the troll has tried to paint you as. Again, a small dedication to you Peter sir shall be made on h2009.com to mark a true disabled champion. I know that you will go from strength to strength. You owned Anthony Bournes and Derek Hornby, and as your enemies rot and die in their own decay you will go from strength to strength, in a long, happy and successful life. To the Haverhill Town Council. You got owned by the disabled today in court. Gordon Mussett, you are an arrogant fool, forcing terminally ill disabled elderly ladies to go to court after your council discriminates against them, and in which you played a significant part in, you are inhuman and without any honour sir. That disabled lady owned you, and perhaps if you ever suffer terminal cancer you will remember that brave disabled lady, because she does not deserve the sort of treatment you gave to her, she does not deserve to be dying of cancer. If there is any justice in the world I hope that the disabled lady beats the cancer, and instead you experience disability and this cancer, and suffer discrimination to see how you like it. I started posting here in this newsgroup highlighting the discrimination of disabled people by Haverhill Town Council. I now with the disabled victory in the courts against Haverhill Town Council today now end my time in this newsgroup. I believe Uenet to be all but dead, mostly now infested with the many accounts of the troll Anthony Bournes. |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
"Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:32:57 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:19:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:41:08 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:04:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Bertie Wooster" wrote in message ... Cyclists in Northern Ireland commit just 9 road traffic offences for every 20,000 committed by motorists. http://nigreenways.wordpress.com/201...loodycyclists/ Obviously it's extremely easy to identify an erring motorist, particularly with ANPR systems being commonplace nowadays,whereas it's virtually impossible to identify an erring psycholist unless you can actually catch him in the act and stop him immediately. You make a very strong case for the compulsory registration and documentation of cyclists, which would go some way to address that bias. How about removing the registration on motorists? I am a motorist, among other things, but I think that would be an idiotic idea. (Rather like not having registration for all road users.) Why? It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. As I thought, you have no idea. Why inconvenience millions for the sake of a few criminals? And as I said: It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. No, you don't have an explanation. Yes, I do, but I'm not wasting it. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:09:15 -0000, Tarcap wrote:
"Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:32:57 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:19:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:41:08 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:04:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Bertie Wooster" wrote in message ... Cyclists in Northern Ireland commit just 9 road traffic offences for every 20,000 committed by motorists. http://nigreenways.wordpress.com/201...loodycyclists/ Obviously it's extremely easy to identify an erring motorist, particularly with ANPR systems being commonplace nowadays,whereas it's virtually impossible to identify an erring psycholist unless you can actually catch him in the act and stop him immediately. You make a very strong case for the compulsory registration and documentation of cyclists, which would go some way to address that bias. How about removing the registration on motorists? I am a motorist, among other things, but I think that would be an idiotic idea. (Rather like not having registration for all road users.) Why? It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. As I thought, you have no idea. Why inconvenience millions for the sake of a few criminals? And as I said: It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. No, you don't have an explanation. Yes, I do, but I'm not wasting it. Perhaps you should spend your time fixing your newsreader so it indents what you're replying to, instead of lying to me. Oh hang on, you're using a M$ email program. Just throw it away and start again. -- What's the difference between spit and swallow? Forty pounds of pressure on the back of her head. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
"Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:09:15 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:32:57 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:19:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:41:08 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:04:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Bertie Wooster" wrote in message ... Cyclists in Northern Ireland commit just 9 road traffic offences for every 20,000 committed by motorists. http://nigreenways.wordpress.com/201...loodycyclists/ Obviously it's extremely easy to identify an erring motorist, particularly with ANPR systems being commonplace nowadays,whereas it's virtually impossible to identify an erring psycholist unless you can actually catch him in the act and stop him immediately. You make a very strong case for the compulsory registration and documentation of cyclists, which would go some way to address that bias. How about removing the registration on motorists? I am a motorist, among other things, but I think that would be an idiotic idea. (Rather like not having registration for all road users.) Why? It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. As I thought, you have no idea. Why inconvenience millions for the sake of a few criminals? And as I said: It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. No, you don't have an explanation. Yes, I do, but I'm not wasting it. Perhaps you should spend your time fixing your newsreader so it indents what you're replying to, instead of lying to me. Oh hang on, you're using a M$ email program. Just throw it away and start again. My email reader does what I want it to. Why should I change to please you? |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:55:51 -0000, Tarcap wrote:
"Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:09:15 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:32:57 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:19:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:41:08 -0000, Tarcap wrote: "Gefreiter Krueger" wrote in message news On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:04:53 -0000, Tarcap wrote: How about removing the registration on motorists? I am a motorist, among other things, but I think that would be an idiotic idea. (Rather like not having registration for all road users.) Why? It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. As I thought, you have no idea. Why inconvenience millions for the sake of a few criminals? And as I said: It's no good explaining the shortcomings of idiotic ideas to idiots. No, you don't have an explanation. Yes, I do, but I'm not wasting it. Perhaps you should spend your time fixing your newsreader so it indents what you're replying to, instead of lying to me. Oh hang on, you're using a M$ email program. Just throw it away and start again. My email reader does what I want it to. Why should I change to please you? So you don't look like a ****t. It looks like you wrote what I did. Do you want people to think you wrote my text? -- Amanpreet was overheard at the hospital angrily say, "My wife just delivered twins!!!" A passerby said, "So? You should be happy about that. Why are you so angry?" "I want to know who the son of a bitch is that's the father of the second kid!" |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 15:06:15 UTC, Gefreiter Krueger wrote:
So you don't look like a ****t. It looks like you wrote what I did. Do you want people to think you wrote my text? It'll take a lot more than that to stop him looking like a ****. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
On 28/11/2013 08:48, Bertie Wooster wrote:
However you like to skew the figures, speeding by motorists is endemic. RLJ by cyclists is ... ....even more common than that. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:36:00 +0000, JNugent
wrote: On 28/11/2013 08:48, Bertie Wooster wrote: However you like to skew the figures, speeding by motorists is endemic. RLJ by cyclists is ... ...even more common than that. Haven't you read the subject line? Just 0.045% of road traffic offences are committed by cyclists, according to official police figures. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
On 28/11/2013 18:07, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:36:00 +0000, JNugent wrote: On 28/11/2013 08:48, Bertie Wooster wrote: However you like to skew the figures, speeding by motorists is endemic. RLJ by cyclists is ... ...even more common than that. Haven't you read the subject line? Just 0.045% of road traffic offences are committed by cyclists, according to official police figures. The figures show how many are prosecuted, nothing to do with how many offend, nor how many possible offences each group can commit. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
0.045% of offences committed by cyclists
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:25:12 +0000, Mrcheerful
wrote: On 28/11/2013 18:07, Bertie Wooster wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:36:00 +0000, JNugent wrote: On 28/11/2013 08:48, Bertie Wooster wrote: However you like to skew the figures, speeding by motorists is endemic. RLJ by cyclists is ... ...even more common than that. Haven't you read the subject line? Just 0.045% of road traffic offences are committed by cyclists, according to official police figures. The figures show how many are prosecuted, nothing to do with how many offend, nor how many possible offences each group can commit. Irrelevant. Any who allegedly commit crimes are innocent until proven guilty. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange this, normally only ever committed by cyclists according toSteve Firth | Squashme | UK | 13 | February 23rd 12 09:19 AM |
The crime of dangerous cycling and the impunity with which it maybe committed | JNugent[_7_] | UK | 52 | March 30th 11 07:52 AM |
offences | mm | UK | 34 | November 9th 05 10:12 PM |
cycling offences | mm | UK | 2 | November 9th 05 10:20 AM |
cycling offences | mm | UK | 1 | November 9th 05 09:59 AM |