Faulty chain broke his neck

A 73-year-old cyclist who was travelling along the new Lewes Road cycle
lane woke up with a broken neck after coming off his bike. the incident
was caused by a problem with Mr McQueen's chain and no other vehicles
were involved.

Dangerous and treacherous things: bicycles.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10852..._Lewes _Road/

On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 19:59:56 UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Dangerous and treacherous things: bicycles.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/1085...ash_near_York/

On 05/12/2013 09:16, wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 19:59:56 UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Dangerous and treacherous things: bicycles.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/1085...ash_near_York/

That sounds OT for a cycling newsgroup, but it seems the driver was
unhurt, see the difference?

On Thursday, 5 December 2013 09:26:12 UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

That sounds OT for a cycling newsgroup, but it seems the driver was
unhurt, see the difference?

Fighting Peugots: http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/nort...lifted-6370798

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message ...

On 05/12/2013 09:16, wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 19:59:56 UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Dangerous and treacherous things: bicycles.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/1085...ash_near_York/

That sounds OT for a cycling newsgroup, but it seems the driver was
unhurt, see the difference?

No, apparently it's not off-topic. You can talk about anything you like, as
long as it's in 'comparison'. A psycholist told me so.

wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 19:59:56 UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Dangerous and treacherous things: bicycles.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/1085...ash_near_York/

OT, have you tried a motoring group?

On 05/12/2013 10:40, Tarcap wrote:


"Mrcheerful" wrote in message ...

On 05/12/2013 09:16, wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 19:59:56 UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Dangerous and treacherous things: bicycles.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/1085...ash_near_York/


That sounds OT for a cycling newsgroup, but it seems the driver was
unhurt, see the difference?

No, apparently it's not off-topic. You can talk about anything you like,
as long as it's in 'comparison'. A psycholist told me so.

Said the troll who is even hated by the other trolls.

PS It was absolutely NOT me who wrote this post. It was that naughty
boy, Brian Robertson.

On 05/12/2013 09:26, Mrcheerful wrote:
On 05/12/2013 09:16, wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 19:59:56 UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Dangerous and treacherous things: bicycles.

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/1085...ash_near_York/


That sounds OT for a cycling newsgroup, but it seems the driver was
unhurt, see the difference?

Yes, the difference is that we don't really want motorists to be
hurt/killed. You, by contrast, want to see cyclists maimed and killed.

PS It wasn't me who posted this. It was that well known drinker and
rake, Brian Robertson. I actually find him very attractive and I would
ask him to make love to me, but I am really a man. I shall have to
content myself with fruitless attempts at getting him banned by his ISP.