A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Typical cyclist



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 15th 13, 05:13 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,547
Default Typical cyclist


"Rob Morley" wrote in message
news:20131215150837.428ae7ab@hyperion...
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:38:14 -0000
"Judith" wrote:

you know you have made it in life, when you drive a 8 year old micra

You know your values are off if you think a person's car defines his
worth.


Bought new, paid cash, 40K miles on the clock.


Ads
  #12  
Old December 15th 13, 06:02 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bertie Wooster[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,958
Default Typical cyclist

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:39:08 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
.. .

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:42:45 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
. ..

On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:06:46 -0000, "Mr Pounder"
wrote:

Makes me proud not to be one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013...n_4360251.html


I'd be interested to know if idiotic remarks are more prevalent among
cyclists than the general population to make your pride justified.

If this NG is anything to go by, I would say most definitely yes.


Are you ignoring the persistent idiocy of Medwit?

I'm thinking more of the persistent childlike playground name calling, of
which most psycholists on here seem to favour (apart from the foul language
and abuse certain other psycholists are partial to).


So you ignore the persistent idiocy of the multiple "Judith" personas?
  #13  
Old December 16th 13, 01:26 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Tarcap
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,950
Default Typical cyclist



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:39:08 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
.. .

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:42:45 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
. ..

On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:06:46 -0000, "Mr Pounder"
wrote:

Makes me proud not to be one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013...n_4360251.html


I'd be interested to know if idiotic remarks are more prevalent among
cyclists than the general population to make your pride justified.

If this NG is anything to go by, I would say most definitely yes.


Are you ignoring the persistent idiocy of Medwit?

I'm thinking more of the persistent childlike playground name calling, of
which most psycholists on here seem to favour (apart from the foul language
and abuse certain other psycholists are partial to).


So you ignore the persistent idiocy of the multiple "Judith" personas?

Yes, because they're mostly perpetrated by the psycholist Brian Robertson.
Why do you think anything he says carries any substance?
(Other than to confirm that most idiotic remarks are made by cyclists, of
course)

  #14  
Old December 16th 13, 07:37 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bertie Wooster[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,958
Default Typical cyclist

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 01:26:00 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
.. .

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:39:08 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
. ..

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:42:45 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:06:46 -0000, "Mr Pounder"
wrote:

Makes me proud not to be one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013...n_4360251.html

I'd be interested to know if idiotic remarks are more prevalent among
cyclists than the general population to make your pride justified.

If this NG is anything to go by, I would say most definitely yes.


Are you ignoring the persistent idiocy of Medwit?

I'm thinking more of the persistent childlike playground name calling, of
which most psycholists on here seem to favour (apart from the foul language
and abuse certain other psycholists are partial to).


So you ignore the persistent idiocy of the multiple "Judith" personas?

Yes, because they're mostly perpetrated by the psycholist Brian Robertson.
Why do you think anything he says carries any substance?
(Other than to confirm that most idiotic remarks are made by cyclists, of
course)


So you ignore the persistent idiocy of the Saint?
  #15  
Old December 16th 13, 07:58 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Tarcap
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,950
Default Typical cyclist



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 01:26:00 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
.. .

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:39:08 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
. ..

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:42:45 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:06:46 -0000, "Mr Pounder"
wrote:

Makes me proud not to be one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013...n_4360251.html

I'd be interested to know if idiotic remarks are more prevalent among
cyclists than the general population to make your pride justified.

If this NG is anything to go by, I would say most definitely yes.


Are you ignoring the persistent idiocy of Medwit?

I'm thinking more of the persistent childlike playground name calling, of
which most psycholists on here seem to favour (apart from the foul
language
and abuse certain other psycholists are partial to).


So you ignore the persistent idiocy of the multiple "Judith" personas?

Yes, because they're mostly perpetrated by the psycholist Brian Robertson.
Why do you think anything he says carries any substance?
(Other than to confirm that most idiotic remarks are made by cyclists, of
course)


So you ignore the persistent idiocy of the Saint?

I don't know to whom you are referring, but I can only see persistent idiocy
in the pro-cycling camp - you know, cyclists should only obey laws that
they want to, helmets cause more injuries than riding without, cyclists are
richer than non-cyclists, cyclists are never to blame - all that sort of
thing.
And please don't start asking for cites - we have all seen that sort of
nonsense on here - it's the the constant denial by psycholists that is
another form of their idiocy.

  #16  
Old December 16th 13, 08:52 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 484
Default Typical cyclist

On Sunday, 15 December 2013 13:39:08 UTC, Tarcap wrote:

I'm thinking more of the persistent childlike playground name calling, of
which most psycholists on here seem to favour (apart from the foul language
and abuse certain other psycholists are partial to).


Like "psycholist" ?

  #17  
Old December 16th 13, 09:42 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Brian Robertson[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 54
Default Typical cyclist

On 15/12/2013 15:08, Rob Morley wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:38:14 -0000
"Judith" wrote:

you know you have made it in life, when you drive a 8 year old micra

You know your values are off if you think a person's car defines his
worth.


That's the interesting point with these people, isn't it. They actually
do think that a person's whole personality and worth can be summed up by
their means of transportation.
  #18  
Old December 16th 13, 09:43 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Brian Robertson[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 54
Default Typical cyclist

On 15/12/2013 15:16, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

I'd be interested to know if idiotic remarks are more prevalent among
cyclists than the general population to make your pride justified.

If this NG is anything to go by, I would say most definitely yes.


Are you ignoring the persistent idiocy of Medwit?


Considering he hasn't posted here for months *and* you recruited
Knobbertson, I'd say things are looking even more one-sided.


Have you seen any coaches doing 70+ mph recently? Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
  #19  
Old December 16th 13, 09:51 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Typical cyclist

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:27:15 +0000, Bertie Wooster wrote:

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:42:45 -0000, "Tarcap"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
. ..

On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:06:46 -0000, "Mr Pounder"
wrote:

Makes me proud not to be one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013...adley-wiggins-

joke_n_4360251.html

I'd be interested to know if idiotic remarks are more prevalent among
cyclists than the general population to make your pride justified.

If this NG is anything to go by, I would say most definitely yes.


Are you ignoring the persistent idiocy of Medwit?


Medwit is not persistent. He took fright. He is gone.
  #20  
Old December 16th 13, 09:54 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Tarcap
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,950
Default Typical cyclist



wrote in message
...

On Sunday, 15 December 2013 13:39:08 UTC, Tarcap wrote:

I'm thinking more of the persistent childlike playground name calling, of
which most psycholists on here seem to favour (apart from the foul
language
and abuse certain other psycholists are partial to).


Like "psycholist" ?


It's term of endearment, dearie.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Typical British cyclist Mrcheerful[_3_] UK 6 July 10th 12 10:50 AM
Typical cyclist Mrcheerful[_2_] UK 1 August 20th 11 06:27 PM
A typical cyclist attacker. Simon Mason[_4_] UK 3 July 16th 11 02:32 PM
typical cyclist? webreader UK 94 January 10th 10 02:39 PM
just a typical cyclist really boulder, MBA UK 13 March 25th 08 10:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.