|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CycloCross Rear Rim For 220# Rider?
Theoretically, I'd like tb able to run the legendary Schwalbe Big
Apples - just to try them out. But practically, I'll probably never go beyond 1.5 or 1.6-inch cyclocross tires and *might* even want to try 23mm tires to see if I can keep up with some of the more dissipated roadies. Seems like 23mm and Big Apples are not going to co-exist. 32-hole. Fully-rigid frame. Rear takes more of a beating than the front. I've had the same single-eyelet Mavic 517's as my front wheels for years - both rigid and FS - with no cracks whereas the same rim lasted about a year on the rear - and that was on an FS. Mavic 618 double-eyelet rear is holding up OK on my rigid. All that being the case, and my being able to live without Big Apples but maybe wanting to try the road tires some time... what would be a rim recommendation? -- PeteCresswell |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
CycloCross Rear Rim For 220# Rider?
On Jun 13, 9:26*pm, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote:
Theoretically, I'd like tb able to run the legendary Schwalbe Big Apples - just to try them out. But practically, I'll probably never go beyond 1.5 or 1.6-inch cyclocross tires and *might* even want to try 23mm tires to see if I can keep up with some of the more dissipated roadies. Seems like 23mm and Big Apples are not going to co-exist. 32-hole. *Fully-rigid frame. Rear takes more of a beating than the front. * I've had the same single-eyelet Mavic 517's as my front wheels for years - both rigid and FS - with no cracks whereas the same rim lasted about a year on the rear - and that was on an FS. * Mavic 618 double-eyelet rear is holding up OK on my rigid. All that being the case, and my being able to live without Big Apples but maybe wanting to try the road tires some time... what would be a rim recommendation? -- PeteCresswell A friend used Alex 24mm rims with Big Apples. I use 22s with Marathon (standard and Plus) tires, so 24 isn't too far out there. Here's a couple of comparison shots: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/forum...sage_id=167964 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
CycloCross Rear Rim For 220# Rider?
On Jun 13, 8:26*pm, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote:
Theoretically, I'd like tb able to run the legendary Schwalbe Big Apples - just to try them out. But practically, I'll probably never go beyond 1.5 or 1.6-inch cyclocross tires and *might* even want to try 23mm tires to see if I can keep up with some of the more dissipated roadies. Seems like 23mm and Big Apples are not going to co-exist. 32-hole. *Fully-rigid frame. Rear takes more of a beating than the front. * I've had the same single-eyelet Mavic 517's as my front wheels for years - both rigid and FS - with no cracks whereas the same rim lasted about a year on the rear - and that was on an FS. * Mavic 618 double-eyelet rear is holding up OK on my rigid. All that being the case, and my being able to live without Big Apples but maybe wanting to try the road tires some time... what would be a rim recommendation? I built my daily rider rims on Alex DM18s (the Adventurers are about the same price and dimensions if you like black) and mounted up some 50mm Conti tires for much of last week (that would be the same as the skinnier Apple), and they rode great at 35psi. My buddy D., who I borrowed them from, used them on skinnier rims and found that he had to pump them harder so they wouldn't feel floppy in turns--the point of fat tires being lost. There's really no rim that's going to be ideal for both. However, the DM18, Adventurer, or Rhynolite will all do 50-60mm tires fine, and also go down to around 28-30 at a minimum. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
CycloCross Rear Rim For 220# Rider?
On 14 June, 02:26, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote:
Theoretically, I'd like tb able to run the legendary Schwalbe Big Apples - just to try them out. But practically, I'll probably never go beyond 1.5 or 1.6-inch cyclocross tires and *might* even want to try 23mm tires to see if I can keep up with some of the more dissipated roadies. Seems like 23mm and Big Apples are not going to co-exist. 32-hole. *Fully-rigid frame. Rear takes more of a beating than the front. * I've had the same single-eyelet Mavic 517's as my front wheels for years - both rigid and FS - with no cracks whereas the same rim lasted about a year on the rear - and that was on an FS. * Mavic 618 double-eyelet rear is holding up OK on my rigid. All that being the case, and my being able to live without Big Apples but maybe wanting to try the road tires some time... what would be a rim recommendation? -- PeteCresswell Stick with the 517 and use less spoke tension. 15swg (1.8mm) may still be OK for 32 spokes at 220lb rider weight, but I think 14swg (2mm) would result in a more satisfactory wheel with nipples adjusted for best wheel response(suspension). With good wheel set up there is generally no need for seperate sus[pension 'systems'. Suspension systems on bicycles have always been a solution looking for a problem. It's poorly built wheels (overly stiff) which create the need. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclocross Rims For 220# Rider? | (PeteCresswell) | Techniques | 5 | August 20th 08 12:43 AM |
Rear cable hanger for Specialized M4 cyclocross frame | jimbob369 | Techniques | 1 | February 4th 06 08:37 AM |
FS: Bruce Gordon Front Low-Rider & Rear Racks $200.00 | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | October 24th 05 04:13 AM |
MTB rider getting cyclocross bike, sizing??? | [email protected] | Off Road | 3 | April 18th 05 10:00 PM |
Thoughts on 28-hole rear hub for 155 lb rider? | Patrick W. | Techniques | 32 | October 6th 04 10:19 PM |