|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be? But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a ..308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless powder. Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and. There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet diameter. You ignorant oaf. -- cheers, John B. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be? But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a .308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless powder. Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and. There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet diameter. You ignorant oaf. -- cheers, John B. I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their ownviciousness?
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:13:05 -0700, James McKinley wrote:
I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? Roadside Breath Testing but they usually ignore the bicyclists unless you wobble a lt. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On 3/28/2020 12:13 AM, James McKinley wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: -snippy snip snip- I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? It is The Center of The Universe! rec.bicycles.tech -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be? But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a .308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless powder. Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and. There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet diameter. You ignorant oaf. -- cheers, John B. I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be? But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a .308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless powder. Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and. There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet diameter. You ignorant oaf. -- cheers, John B. I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions. :-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all his confusion about Di2! -- - Frank Krygowski |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On Sunday, 29 March 2020 20:02:22 UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote: On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be? But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a .308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless powder. Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and. There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet diameter. You ignorant oaf. -- cheers, John B. I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions. :-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all his confusion about Di2! -- - Frank Krygowski LOL! talks about the pot calling the kettle black! Cheers |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot
wrote: On Sunday, 29 March 2020 20:02:22 UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote: On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be? But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a .308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless powder. Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and. There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet diameter. You ignorant oaf. -- cheers, John B. I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions. :-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all his confusion about Di2! -- - Frank Krygowski LOL! talks about the pot calling the kettle black! Cheers What! Frank has switched to electric shifting? (what is the world coming to?) -- cheers, John B. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their ownviciousness?
On 3/29/2020 9:25 PM, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Sunday, 29 March 2020 20:02:22 UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote: On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote: On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote: Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool: On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich wrote: Now it is your memory that is failing you. No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again. I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is just the "crazy pills" that you take. But for whatever reason you lie! -- cheers, John B. Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308". Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be? But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a .308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless powder. Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and. There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet diameter. You ignorant oaf. -- cheers, John B. I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT? What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions. :-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all his confusion about Di2! -- - Frank Krygowski LOL! talks about the pot calling the kettle black! Cheers What! Frank has switched to electric shifting? (what is the world coming to?) I don't know what Sir is mis-remembering. Yes, I did two bottom brackets last week. No, unlike Tom, I didn't require repeated questions here to figure out how to do the job. I did the job, then mentioned it afterward. So far, I've had absolutely zero problems with Di2. I have a foolproof method for avoiding Di2 problems! ;-) -- - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About the thief Peter Howard and his slimy fellow travellers | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 11 | March 23rd 11 10:01 PM |
A Toyota makes you dumb; a bicycle makes you smart | SMS | Recumbent Biking | 3 | April 21st 10 01:41 AM |
A Toyota makes you dumb; a bicycle makes you smart | SMS | Recumbent Biking | 2 | April 20th 10 11:53 PM |
So we were drooling over the 09 Kona catalog as I stopped by the LBSfor coffee | landotter | Techniques | 62 | September 7th 08 02:36 AM |
BikeE? (was: So we were drooling over the 09 Kona catalog as I stoppedby the LBS for coffee) | Tom Sherman[_2_] | Recumbent Biking | 18 | September 6th 08 02:16 PM |