Biking w/o Cindy Sheehan

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ush-bike_x.htm

--
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp...tiondeaths.png

Robert Chung wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ush-bike_x.htm
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp...tiondeaths.png

This story makes me detest him a bit less, but he's still done more
damage to the US and the rest of the world than any other president the
US has ever had.

"Jay S. Hill" wrote in message
ink.net...
Robert Chung wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ush-bike_x.htm
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp...tiondeaths.png

This story makes me detest him a bit less, but he's still done more damage
to the US and the rest of the world than any other president the US has
ever had.

Always nice to see the educated opinion of diplomats and government service
workers who have real experience in these matters.

And of course we all know that Clinton didn't do any damage to this country
by selling top secret ICBM guidance technology to the Chinese while hauling
bags of loot into the White House. He didn't do any damage by GIVING North
Korea nuclear technology and materials which has since allowed them to build
nuclear bombs and threaten Japan.

Do you suppose the fact that a policy put in place by one of Hillary's
cronies prevented the FBI from obtaining information which said that
Mohammed Atta was planning a major terrorist strike inside the USA and which
would have probably prevented 9/11 just MIGHT be construed by some people
(probably only friends and relatives of 9/11 victims) as being damaging to
the US in the eyes of the world?

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:11:42 GMT, "Tom Kunich"
wrote:

"Jay S. Hill" wrote in message
link.net...
Robert Chung wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ush-bike_x.htm
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp...tiondeaths.png

This story makes me detest him a bit less, but he's still done more damage
to the US and the rest of the world than any other president the US has
ever had.

Always nice to see the educated opinion of diplomats and government service
workers who have real experience in these matters.

And of course we all know that Clinton didn't do any damage to this country
by selling top secret ICBM guidance technology to the Chinese while hauling
bags of loot into the White House. He didn't do any damage by GIVING North
Korea nuclear technology and materials which has since allowed them to build
nuclear bombs and threaten Japan.

Do you suppose the fact that a policy put in place by one of Hillary's
cronies prevented the FBI from obtaining information which said that
Mohammed Atta was planning a major terrorist strike inside the USA and which
would have probably prevented 9/11 just MIGHT be construed by some people
(probably only friends and relatives of 9/11 victims) as being damaging to
the US in the eyes of the world?



Until this last election I've always voted R.

W is a dumbass.

"D. Ferguson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:11:42 GMT, "Tom Kunich"
wrote:

"Jay S. Hill" wrote in message
hlink.net...
Robert Chung wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ush-bike_x.htm
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp...tiondeaths.png

This story makes me detest him a bit less, but he's still done more
damage
to the US and the rest of the world than any other president the US has
ever had.

Always nice to see the educated opinion of diplomats and government
service
workers who have real experience in these matters.

And of course we all know that Clinton didn't do any damage to this
country
by selling top secret ICBM guidance technology to the Chinese while
hauling
bags of loot into the White House. He didn't do any damage by GIVING North
Korea nuclear technology and materials which has since allowed them to
build
nuclear bombs and threaten Japan.

Do you suppose the fact that a policy put in place by one of Hillary's
cronies prevented the FBI from obtaining information which said that
Mohammed Atta was planning a major terrorist strike inside the USA and
which
would have probably prevented 9/11 just MIGHT be construed by some people
(probably only friends and relatives of 9/11 victims) as being damaging to
the US in the eyes of the world?



Until this last election I've always voted R.

W is a dumbass.

You know, I heard EXACTLY the same thing about Vietnam. All of you bozos
screamed like little girls about **** you knew nothing about and then after
some 4 million people were slaughtered by the communists in Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia not one of you effiminite *******s said a single word.

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:59:43 GMT, "Tom Kunich"
wrote:





Until this last election I've always voted R.

W is a dumbass.

You know, I heard EXACTLY the same thing about Vietnam. All of you bozos
screamed like little girls about **** you knew nothing about and then after
some 4 million people were slaughtered by the communists in Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia not one of you effiminite *******s said a single word.



You heard that W was a dumbass? Wow, who knew back then?

You're steamrolling on something you know jack **** about.

If "slaughter" is the criteria then we've dropped the ball a number of
times between Vietnam and Iraq. What has W done about the Sudan?

And I don't hear anyone saying nothing should be done about terrorism
or Iraq. Just that playing cowboy is the wrong way to go about it.

And captain flip flop is not just fking up in the Iraq department.

Foreign policy- ****
Environmental issues- ****
Stem Cell research- ****
Religion- kooky ****

I'm as conservative and capitalistic as they come but this knuckle
head has just screwed up a too many things. For all the time I've
spent explaining that Reagan was good, I have 10x more to say about
how W is bad.

On 8/14/05 6:59 PM, in article
t, "Tom Kunich"
wrote:

"D. Ferguson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:11:42 GMT, "Tom Kunich"
wrote:

"Jay S. Hill" wrote in message
ink.net...
Robert Chung wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ush-bike_x.htm
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp...tiondeaths.png

This story makes me detest him a bit less, but he's still done more
damage
to the US and the rest of the world than any other president the US has
ever had.

Always nice to see the educated opinion of diplomats and government
service
workers who have real experience in these matters.

And of course we all know that Clinton didn't do any damage to this
country
by selling top secret ICBM guidance technology to the Chinese while
hauling
bags of loot into the White House. He didn't do any damage by GIVING North
Korea nuclear technology and materials which has since allowed them to
build
nuclear bombs and threaten Japan.

Do you suppose the fact that a policy put in place by one of Hillary's
cronies prevented the FBI from obtaining information which said that
Mohammed Atta was planning a major terrorist strike inside the USA and
which
would have probably prevented 9/11 just MIGHT be construed by some people
(probably only friends and relatives of 9/11 victims) as being damaging to
the US in the eyes of the world?



Until this last election I've always voted R.

W is a dumbass.

You know, I heard EXACTLY the same thing about Vietnam. All of you bozos
screamed like little girls about **** you knew nothing about and then after
some 4 million people were slaughtered by the communists in Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia not one of you effiminite *******s said a single word.


A bunch of liberal weasels. Lookin for anything to latch on to.......

http://www.thereporter.com/sheehan/ci_2936043

http://www.thereporter.com/sheehan/ci_2936045

http://www.thereporter.com/sheehanopinions/ci_2936053

Cindy Sheehan's incessant Bush-hating landed her on the Web site of
Al-Jazeera, a propaganda arm for Muslim terrorists, and splintered her
family, who mourn the loss of her son, Army Spc. Casey Sheehan, who died
last year in Iraq. Mrs. Sheehan is now a tool of America-haters. She has
joined the family of radical Democrats in defiance of her son's blood
relations.

Her family has had enough. Cherie Quarterolo, Casey's godmother and aunt,
wrote a letter to KSFO saying the family broke its silence because "our
family has been so distressed by the recent activities of Cindy."

"Tom Kunich" wrote in message
nk.net...
"D. Ferguson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:11:42 GMT, "Tom Kunich"
wrote:

"Jay S. Hill" wrote in message
hlink.net...
Robert Chung wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...ush-bike_x.htm
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp...tiondeaths.png

This story makes me detest him a bit less, but he's still done more
damage
to the US and the rest of the world than any other president the US
has
ever had.

Always nice to see the educated opinion of diplomats and government
service
workers who have real experience in these matters.

And of course we all know that Clinton didn't do any damage to this
country
by selling top secret ICBM guidance technology to the Chinese while
hauling
bags of loot into the White House. He didn't do any damage by GIVING
North
Korea nuclear technology and materials which has since allowed them to
build
nuclear bombs and threaten Japan.

Do you suppose the fact that a policy put in place by one of Hillary's
cronies prevented the FBI from obtaining information which said that
Mohammed Atta was planning a major terrorist strike inside the USA and
which
would have probably prevented 9/11 just MIGHT be construed by some
people
(probably only friends and relatives of 9/11 victims) as being damaging
to
the US in the eyes of the world?



Until this last election I've always voted R.

W is a dumbass.

You know, I heard EXACTLY the same thing about Vietnam. All of you bozos
screamed like little girls about **** you knew nothing about and then
after
some 4 million people were slaughtered by the communists in Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia not one of you effiminite *******s said a single word.




As much of an idiot as Bush is, you still have one up on him in the idiot
department, because he knows he's ****ing over this country, while you
remain clueless to the mass destruction.

Tom Kunich wrote:

You know, I heard EXACTLY the same thing about Vietnam. All of you bozos
screamed like little girls about **** you knew nothing about and then after
some 4 million people were slaughtered by the communists in Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia not one of you effiminite *******s said a single word.



Dumbass -

The Communist Vietnamese were the ones who ousted the Communist Khmer
Rouge in Cambodia.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

In article et,
"Tom Kunich" wrote:

"D. Ferguson" wrote in message
...

Until this last election I've always voted R.

W is a dumbass.

You know, I heard EXACTLY the same thing about Vietnam. All of you bozos
screamed like little girls about **** you knew nothing about and then after
some 4 million people were slaughtered by the communists in Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia not one of you effiminite *******s said a single word.

It's never occurred to you, Tom, that there was exactly zero chance of the US
"winning" in Vietnam, has it?

As for Cambodia, maybe you've forgotten that Nixon ordered secret heavy
bombing of Cambodia, international law be damned. Besides killing thousands of
innocent Cambodians, this started a massive refugee crisis, which was more than
the government of Cambodia could begin to deal with. Lon Nol and his government
were seriously corrupt and brutally repressive, and were seen by many Cambodians
(especially after the bombing commenced) to be collaborating with the US. So Pol
Pot had recruits aplenty - in fact as much as 10% of the entire population had
joined up with him. Perhaps you've also forgotten that Reagan's White House were
supporters of the Khmer Rouge in the early '80s. They even voted to seat a Khmer
Rouge official as Cambodia's UN rep. Aid to anti-Khmer Rouge forces came about
because the House foriegn-affairs subcommittee pushed for it. And who was
running the House then? Democrats, Tom.

The great thing about all this is that no matter how badly planned (or not
planned at all) anything the Republicans - and GWB in particular - do, when it
fails (to no one's surprise, except the true believers, of course), you have a
ready made excuse: blame the "Liberals". You just can't accept that your guys
are inept fools. This was flogged mightily last April in that "EPO and Hobby
Cyclists" thread. You blamed liberals for every ill and bad thing in the world,
all towards proving your point that "Liberals" won't accept responsibility for
anything, but conservatives do. Apparently the irony of that was lost on you.

--
tanx,
Howard

Butter is love.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?