|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
I have a Road bike, with 9 speed Shimano 105 group set.
Coming from a cheap bike, I wanted to ask about the gears. Can I use all the gears ? Ie the big front ring to the smallest rear ring ? Does this stuff the chain big time or what ? What should I set as the limits ? ............ Thankyou kindly for much needed advice. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
Robbie Hewson Wrote: I have a Road bike, with 9 speed Shimano 105 group set. Coming from a cheap bike, I wanted to ask about the gears. Can I use all the gears ? Ie the big front ring to the smallest rear ring ? Does this stuff the chain big time or what ? What should I set as the limits ? ............ Thankyou kindly for much needed advice. Depending on the trimming of the derailers, you may find that you can't use all of the ratios. Specifically, the chain might rub against the front derailer in either or both of the large/large and small/small combinations because the chain-line becomes less straight when viewed from above. The large/small combination should be fine if set up correctly. As for my own set-up, I like to use 7 out of the 9 in each front ring so there is plenty of overlap. Ritch -- ritcho |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
ritcho Wrote: Depending on the trimming of the derailers, you may find that you can't use all of the ratios. Specifically, the chain might rub against the front derailer in either or both of the large/large and small/small combinations because the chain-line becomes less straight when viewed from above. The large/small combination should be fine if set up correctly. As for my own set-up, I like to use 7 out of the 9 in each front ring so there is plenty of overlap. Ritch avoid if you can the big-big, and small-small combos. chainline is too extreme andyour derailleur aint gonna like that big-big one -- flyingdutch |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
"flyingdutch" wrote in message ... ritcho Wrote: Depending on the trimming of the derailers, you may find that you can't use all of the ratios. Specifically, the chain might rub against the front derailer in either or both of the large/large and small/small combinations because the chain-line becomes less straight when viewed from above. The large/small combination should be fine if set up correctly. As for my own set-up, I like to use 7 out of the 9 in each front ring so there is plenty of overlap. Ritch avoid if you can the big-big, and small-small combos. chainline is too extreme andyour derailleur aint gonna like that big-big one -- flyingdutch Sometimes you might end up going big to big but it's better to change chain rings before that happens. As the others said, it's not desireable, but at the same time it won't cause your bike to self destruct. As long as the chain is not too short things will be ok. Marty |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
Sometimes you might end up going big to big but it's better
to change chain rings before that happens. As the others said, it's not desireable, but at the same time it won't cause your bike to self destruct. As long as the chain is not too short things will be ok. And the standard argument is also that small-small must be avoided at all costs, because it has the highest chain-to-tooth contact pressure, and hence will cause rapid wear. But ask for data supporting that, even from guru Sheldon, and you'll get zip. Personally, I doubt there is really much in it. But then, my road bike has gears that were probably made by Brinell himself. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
Glen F Wrote: Sometimes you might end up going big to big but it's better to change chain rings before that happens. As the others said, it's not desireable, but at the same time it won't cause your bike to self destruct. As long as the chain is not too short things will be ok. And the standard argument is also that small-small must be avoided at all costs, because it has the highest chain-to-tooth contact pressure, and hence will cause rapid wear. But ask for data supporting that, even from guru Sheldon, and you'll get zip. Personally, I doubt there is really much in it. But then, my road bike has gears that were probably made by Brinell himself. shimano is fairly notorius for front derailleur noise in the small-small combo. Of course such things NEVER happen with campag! (yeah, right!) -- flyingdutch |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
"Glen F" wrote in message ... But then, my road bike has gears that were probably made by Brinell himself. Who is Brinell? Marty |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
Marty Wallace Wrote: Who is Brinell? J.A. Brinell http://www.instron.com/applications/...ss/brinell.asp -- aeek |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
"Glen F" wrote in message
Sometimes you might end up going big to big but it's better to change chain rings before that happens. As the others said, it's not desireable, but at the same time it won't cause your bike to self destruct. As long as the chain is not too short things will be ok. And the standard argument is also that small-small must be avoided at all costs, because it has the highest chain-to-tooth contact pressure, and hence will cause rapid wear. But ask for data supporting that, even from guru Sheldon, and you'll get zip. Personally, I doubt there is really much in it. It's one of those old ideas that just won't die. It comes from the Good Old Days when your average 10-speed was bleeding edge. It's much, much less of an issue with modern drivetrains. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gear Question ( 9 speed )
DRS Wrote: "Glen F" wrote in message It's one of those old ideas that just won't die. It comes from the Good Old Days when your average 10-speed was bleeding edge. It's much, much less of an issue with modern drivetrains. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? Have you asked your poor old chain that? "Owww, sideplate friction (wear) increasing as it comes off the chainring!!! angular load on the pins increasing!!! WHAT?!?!?! you want to SPRINT in that gear?!?!?! AAAGGGHHHHH!!!!! POP!" Neutral chainline (i.e. no bend) falls ideally between 4 and 6 (8/9/10 spd)at the back (hypothetical chainline between chainrings). You have deflection of about 22mm from this to top cog on 9 speed. Add about 4mm for small/small combo, and you've got about 26 mm of deflection - over 410mm average chainstay length. With two significant friction points where the chain bends. On 650C triple c/set bikes I have built with x-short chainstays, I tell the owners definitely NOT to load up the small/small gear combo, or at least take a chain tool with them to salvage the inevitable breakage. M"singlespeeds don't mess my head"H -- mfhor |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Singlespeed gear "placing" question | basjan | Techniques | 2 | June 3rd 04 10:03 PM |
Doable - a 9 gear Shimano Cluster on a 7 speed Shimano Exage hub? | Peter | General | 4 | April 29th 04 09:52 AM |
WTB: 10 TOOTH GEAR FOR 10 SPEED?? | George | Marketplace | 1 | April 2nd 04 04:39 AM |
road speed question | unisk8r | Unicycling | 9 | February 27th 04 06:23 PM |
Dumb Newbie Qs on Gears and Speed | Elisa Francesca Roselli | General | 14 | July 27th 03 08:23 PM |