The ambulance chasers are lining up the cycle hire scheme

In article , says...

With the highlighting of the two serious brain injuries suffered by Boris
bike users in the short time it has in operation. Perhaps no supplied
helmet will open the scheme up to litigation?

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-...ed-lu-2742.htm

There wouldn't be any danger associated with cycling if there weren't
any selfish cager *******s. You and other cagers are MURDERING ****S.

Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/
The usenet price promise: all opinions offered in newsgroups are
guaranteed to be worth the price paid.

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
In article , says...

With the highlighting of the two serious brain injuries suffered by
Boris bike users in the short time it has in operation. Perhaps no
supplied helmet will open the scheme up to litigation?

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-...ed-lu-2742.htm

There wouldn't be any danger associated with cycling if there weren't
any selfish cager *******s. You and other cagers are MURDERING ****S.

Guy

no danger from just falling off and hitting street furniture? No danger
from riding into rivers, crashing into pedestrians and mobility scooters or
from level crossings, and if there were no cars then you could crash into
horses, and just see what one of them does to you when it is frightened.
Cyclists bring on their own problems, they should fix their end, then
complain.

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
In article , says...

With the highlighting of the two serious brain injuries suffered by
Boris bike users in the short time it has in operation. Perhaps no
supplied helmet will open the scheme up to litigation?

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-...ed-lu-2742.htm

There wouldn't be any danger associated with cycling if there weren't
any selfish cager *******s. You and other cagers are MURDERING ****S.

Guy

no danger from just falling off and hitting street furniture? No danger
from riding into rivers, crashing into pedestrians and mobility scooters
or from level crossings, and if there were no cars then you could crash
into horses, and just see what one of them does to you when it is
frightened.
Cyclists bring on their own problems, they should fix their end, then
complain.

Erh! what's that in English then? LOL

Jolly polly wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
In article ,
says...

With the highlighting of the two serious brain injuries suffered by
Boris bike users in the short time it has in operation. Perhaps no
supplied helmet will open the scheme up to litigation?

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-...ed-lu-2742.htm

There wouldn't be any danger associated with cycling if there
weren't any selfish cager *******s. You and other cagers are
MURDERING ****S. Guy

no danger from just falling off and hitting street furniture? No
danger from riding into rivers, crashing into pedestrians and
mobility scooters or from level crossings, and if there were no cars
then you could crash into horses, and just see what one of them does
to you when it is frightened.
Cyclists bring on their own problems, they should fix their end, then
complain.

Erh! what's that in English then? LOL

which bit?

Mrcheerful wrote:
With the highlighting of the two serious brain injuries suffered by
Boris bike users in the short time it has in operation. Perhaps no
supplied helmet will open the scheme up to litigation?

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-...ed-lu-2742.htm


Looks like they've got their answer back from Boris' friends:

"In a government-commissioned report, the Tory peer calls for a
clampdown on lawyers who "entice" people to pursue personal injury claims."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11454241

Tony

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Jolly polly wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
In article ,
says...

With the highlighting of the two serious brain injuries suffered by
Boris bike users in the short time it has in operation. Perhaps no
supplied helmet will open the scheme up to litigation?

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-...ed-lu-2742.htm

There wouldn't be any danger associated with cycling if there
weren't any selfish cager *******s. You and other cagers are
MURDERING ****S. Guy

no danger from just falling off and hitting street furniture? No
danger from riding into rivers, crashing into pedestrians and
mobility scooters or from level crossings, and if there were no cars
then you could crash into horses, and just see what one of them does
to you when it is frightened.
Cyclists bring on their own problems, they should fix their end, then
complain.

Erh! what's that in English then? LOL

which bit?

the bit from no danger...
to ... then complain.

Jolly polly wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Jolly polly wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
In article ,
says...

With the highlighting of the two serious brain injuries suffered
by Boris bike users in the short time it has in operation. Perhaps no
supplied helmet will open the scheme up to litigation?

http://www.access-legal.co.uk/legal-...ed-lu-2742.htm

There wouldn't be any danger associated with cycling if there
weren't any selfish cager *******s. You and other cagers are
MURDERING ****S. Guy

no danger from just falling off and hitting street furniture? No
danger from riding into rivers, crashing into pedestrians and
mobility scooters or from level crossings, and if there were no
cars then you could crash into horses, and just see what one of
them does to you when it is frightened.
Cyclists bring on their own problems, they should fix their end,
then complain.

Erh! what's that in English then? LOL

which bit?

the bit from no danger...
to ... then complain.

The previous assertion was that there would be no danger to cyclists if all
cars disappeared.

I was attempting to point out that there would still be multiple dangers to
cyclists, some of which would greatly increase if cars were not around.

The final sentence points out that cyclists have behaved so badly in recent
years that they have become despised road users, and that before their lot
will improve their cycling must improve, once that has happened (and if
there are still problems) THEN they can complain about their perceived
status.

I am sorry if all the above was not clear to you or others.