|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road on Woodhead Pass
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 19:27:29 UTC+1, wrote:
On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any relation to Mr Pink-Whistle or Mr Twiddle? |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On 21/10/2020 19:27, Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any sign of the promised-for-decades Tintwistle Bypass? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 7:41:00 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 19:27:29 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any relation to Mr Pink-Whistle or Mr Twiddle? It was one of the stop offs on my epic 8 counties evening pub crawl taking in Humberside, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire and North Yorkshire in 1984. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 20:19:23 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/10/2020 19:27, Simon Mason wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any sign of the promised-for-decades Tintwistle Bypass? It's called the M62. No Motor Vehicles except for access signs should be a cheap solution since motor vehicle operators always obey the law. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On 21/10/2020 20:27, Simon Mason wrote:
On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 7:41:00 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 19:27:29 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any relation to Mr Pink-Whistle or Mr Twiddle? It was one of the stop offs on my epic 8 counties evening pub crawl taking in Humberside, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire and North Yorkshire in 1984. All in one night? That's some going. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road on Woodhead Pass
On 21/10/2020 21:28, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 20:19:23 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 19:27, Simon Mason wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any sign of the promised-for-decades Tintwistle Bypass? It's called the M62. Wrong (again, fancy that). What was the point in that pitfully-failed attempt at a wisecrack? No Motor Vehicles except for access signs should be a cheap solution since motor vehicle operators always obey the law. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 22:06:49 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/10/2020 21:28, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 20:19:23 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 19:27, Simon Mason wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any sign of the promised-for-decades Tintwistle Bypass? It's called the M62. Wrong (again, fancy that). Motorvehiclists who wish to pass East/West over the Pennines to/from Manchester can use the M62 and therefor avoid Tintwistle. it's not a terribly difficult concept to grasp. What was the point in that pitfully-failed attempt at a wisecrack? No Motor Vehicles except for access signs should be a cheap solution since motor vehicle operators always obey the law. It is common practice to impose restriction on through traffic once a bypass has been provided. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On 21/10/2020 22:18, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 22:06:49 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 21:28, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 20:19:23 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 19:27, Simon Mason wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any sign of the promised-for-decades Tintwistle Bypass? It's called the M62. Wrong (again, fancy that). Motorvehiclists who wish to pass East/West over the Pennines to/from Manchester can use the M62 and therefor avoid Tintwistle. it's not a terribly difficult concept to grasp. Which bit of the fact that a bypass for Tintwistle has long been planned and promised (but not yet built) is too difficult a concept for you to grasp? [That's rhetorical; it is well understood that all of it is too difficult for you.] What was the point in that pitfully-failed attempt at a wisecrack? No Motor Vehicles except for access signs should be a cheap solution since motor vehicle operators always obey the law. It is common practice to impose restriction on through traffic once a bypass has been provided. Not as common as all that, and certainly not where the restiriction means that traffic entering a town has to exit in the direction from which it entered, even if its next destination dicates travel in th opposite direction. Not, of course, that the M62 can credibly be claimed as a bypass for Tintwistle, with that town (and the Woodhead Pass) being fed from the west by the M67 motorway which is linked to the Lancashire motorway and trunk road network. As a pure aside, have you ever approached Stockport by road from the south-east of England? Have a little think about the optimum route. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 23:17:14 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/10/2020 22:18, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 22:06:49 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 21:28, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 20:19:23 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 19:27, Simon Mason wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any sign of the promised-for-decades Tintwistle Bypass? It's called the M62. Wrong (again, fancy that). Motorvehiclists who wish to pass East/West over the Pennines to/from Manchester can use the M62 and therefor avoid Tintwistle. it's not a terribly difficult concept to grasp. Which bit of the fact that a bypass for Tintwistle has long been planned and promised (but not yet built) is too difficult a concept for you to grasp? [That's rhetorical; it is well understood that all of it is too difficult for you.] What was the point in that pitfully-failed attempt at a wisecrack? No Motor Vehicles except for access signs should be a cheap solution since motor vehicle operators always obey the law. It is common practice to impose restriction on through traffic once a bypass has been provided. Not as common as all that, and certainly not where the restiriction means that traffic entering a town has to exit in the direction from which it entered, even if its next destination dicates travel in th opposite direction. Not, of course, that the M62 can credibly be claimed as a bypass for Tintwistle, with that town (and the Woodhead Pass) being fed from the west by the M67 motorway which is linked to the Lancashire motorway and trunk road network. As a pure aside, have you ever approached Stockport by road from the south-east of England? Have a little think about the optimum route. Why would anyone want to go to Stockport? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Video: Slow-moving idiot driver forces cyclist off the road onWoodhead Pass
On 21/10/2020 23:31, Mike Collins wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 23:17:14 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 22:18, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 22:06:49 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 21:28, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 20:19:23 UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 21/10/2020 19:27, Simon Mason wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 6:53:58 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: On Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 18:14:35 UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 5:28:51 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote: https://road.cc/content/news/video-d...ad-pass-278091 Why were the motor vehicles not on the parallel M62? There is a 'perfectly good' motorway provided 'at great expense to the tax payer'. To be fair, the M62 is some 15 miles north of Woodhead Pass. Which doesn't excuse his idiotic and dangerous driving, of course. 15 miles with a maximum speed limit of 60mph means the average law abiding driver will be there in 10 mins. Assuming they're not going to Tintwistle. Any sign of the promised-for-decades Tintwistle Bypass? It's called the M62. Wrong (again, fancy that). Motorvehiclists who wish to pass East/West over the Pennines to/from Manchester can use the M62 and therefor avoid Tintwistle. it's not a terribly difficult concept to grasp. Which bit of the fact that a bypass for Tintwistle has long been planned and promised (but not yet built) is too difficult a concept for you to grasp? [That's rhetorical; it is well understood that all of it is too difficult for you.] What was the point in that pitfully-failed attempt at a wisecrack? No Motor Vehicles except for access signs should be a cheap solution since motor vehicle operators always obey the law. It is common practice to impose restriction on through traffic once a bypass has been provided. Not as common as all that, and certainly not where the restiriction means that traffic entering a town has to exit in the direction from which it entered, even if its next destination dicates travel in th opposite direction. Not, of course, that the M62 can credibly be claimed as a bypass for Tintwistle, with that town (and the Woodhead Pass) being fed from the west by the M67 motorway which is linked to the Lancashire motorway and trunk road network. As a pure aside, have you ever approached Stockport by road from the south-east of England? Have a little think about the optimum route. Why would anyone want to go to Stockport? You'll probably find it difficult to grasp this (sorry about that), but it all boils down to a four-letter word of which you may have had little experience: work. When I was a worker, mine took me all over England (not so much in the north, but never say never). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Near Miss of the Day 449: Cyclist gets very close pass from driver ofbus ... operated by company that has given its drivers close pass training | Simon Mason[_6_] | UK | 6 | August 6th 20 05:54 PM |
How to pass a slow cyclist | Alycidon | UK | 48 | February 12th 16 03:39 PM |
Cyclist forces driver to reverse out of his way | Alycidon | UK | 144 | January 11th 16 11:17 AM |
Idiot bus driver hits idiot cyclist | [email protected] | UK | 112 | March 7th 12 10:14 AM |
Idiot bus driver hits idiot cyclist | Mr. Benn[_9_] | UK | 36 | March 7th 12 07:52 AM |