A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Schwinn vs Huffy



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old January 1st 05, 12:50 AM
Ryan Cousineau
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
wrote:

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:10:47 -0600, Jeff Starr
wrote:

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:07:28 -0700,
wrote:

wrote:
In any case, as I understand it, the only real value of
cleats is for extraordinary climbs and perhaps very brief
sprints,


Carl, didn't we explain, why those of us who use clipless, like them
and why, a long time ago?
I seem to remember telling you why I liked them. I know this topic has
been covered, more than once.


Dear Jeff,

You may have explained what you like about them, but I don't
recall the thread--and your present explanation is somewhat
vague.

Why do you like them?


I can tell you why I like them: because my feet don't come off the
pedals, no matter what. In traffic, this means more sure-footed, quicker
acceleration from a stop, which turns out to be very useful at times. I
have a fun bike with flat pedals (but serious ones: pegged BMX-style
platforms on the notorious BMX LX, the little bike with the 7-speed
drivetrain), and aside from general nervousness, I just can't sprint as
hard, and I find myself being much more conscious of foot weighting. In
essence, platforms don't tolerate any divergence from a clean pedaling
technique, and if you manage to get yourself in trouble, your foot is
likely to come off the pedals.

I would describe the essence of clipless as being about a positive
connection to the pedals. This is the same feeling you get from using
clips-and-straps, except with easy unclipping.

Note that flat pedals have their place: freeriders and other types of
stunt riders (BMX freestyle, urban mountain bikers, dirt jumpers, etc.)
swear by flats, and it is an oft-repeated maxim that the proper way to
learn bunnyhops is to use flat pedals, so you don't get into the bad
habits clipless teaches you (you can basically pull a bike off the
ground with clipless and a jump, but serious bunny hops involve an odd
up-and-over movement with the handlebars and no lifting with the feet,
except a bit of back-and-up that can be done even on flat (pegged)
pedals).

I ride clipless on some fairly stunty dirt trails,
--
Ryan Cousineau,
http://www.wiredcola.com
Verus de parvis; verus de magnis.
Ads
  #72  
Old January 1st 05, 02:16 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:50:49 -0800, Ryan Cousineau
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:10:47 -0600, Jeff Starr
wrote:

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:07:28 -0700,
wrote:

wrote:
In any case, as I understand it, the only real value of
cleats is for extraordinary climbs and perhaps very brief
sprints,


Carl, didn't we explain, why those of us who use clipless, like them
and why, a long time ago?
I seem to remember telling you why I liked them. I know this topic has
been covered, more than once.


Dear Jeff,

You may have explained what you like about them, but I don't
recall the thread--and your present explanation is somewhat
vague.

Why do you like them?


I can tell you why I like them: because my feet don't come off the
pedals, no matter what. In traffic, this means more sure-footed, quicker
acceleration from a stop, which turns out to be very useful at times. I
have a fun bike with flat pedals (but serious ones: pegged BMX-style
platforms on the notorious BMX LX, the little bike with the 7-speed
drivetrain), and aside from general nervousness, I just can't sprint as
hard, and I find myself being much more conscious of foot weighting. In
essence, platforms don't tolerate any divergence from a clean pedaling
technique, and if you manage to get yourself in trouble, your foot is
likely to come off the pedals.

I would describe the essence of clipless as being about a positive
connection to the pedals. This is the same feeling you get from using
clips-and-straps, except with easy unclipping.

Note that flat pedals have their place: freeriders and other types of
stunt riders (BMX freestyle, urban mountain bikers, dirt jumpers, etc.)
swear by flats, and it is an oft-repeated maxim that the proper way to
learn bunnyhops is to use flat pedals, so you don't get into the bad
habits clipless teaches you (you can basically pull a bike off the
ground with clipless and a jump, but serious bunny hops involve an odd
up-and-over movement with the handlebars and no lifting with the feet,
except a bit of back-and-up that can be done even on flat (pegged)
pedals).

I ride clipless on some fairly stunty dirt trails,


Dear Ryan,

Yes, cleats should let a rider accelerate more quickly
because of the added extra power of pulling up with the hind
leg, just as they allow a rider to climb a steeper hill (but
not for long).

But I'm a little dubious about how much practical difference
is actually gained by such violent efforts, since bicycles
generally accelerate like slugs and climbs that require
pulling up with the back foot had better be awfully short.
(The comment applies to bunny hops, which are fun, but not
something indulged in by most riders wearing cleats.)

I'm also still a little dubious of the fears that the feet
of upright riders need to be restrained lest they fly off
during normal pedalling.

After all, even at a fairly frantic 120 rpm on a 175mm
crank, our feet are moving in circles at just under 5
mph--about 4.92 mph, according to my spreadsheet. (With his
180mm crank, Jobst would be spinning at 5.06 mph at 120 rpm,
but I think that his mashing habits make this unlikely.)

At 90 rpm, of course, the foot on a 175mm crank moves at a
steady 3.7 mph.

Walking and pedalling are hardly perfect analogies, but it's
worth pointing out that during normal brisk walking at 4
mph, each foot routinely accelerates from a dead stop (foot
on ground) to around 8 mph (middle of stride) and back to 0
mph (foot on ground again) with every step.

I gather that many people just like the feeling of cleats,
which seems to me like a perfectly good reason to use them.

One use for cleats that I forgot is to help recumbent
riders, whose feet otherwise do tend to fall off the pedals
when coasting because their leg angle prevents gravity from
gluing their feet to the pedals.

Carl Fogel
  #73  
Old January 1st 05, 02:28 AM
Tom Sherman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Carl Fogel wrote:
...
One use for cleats that I forgot is to help recumbent
riders, whose feet otherwise do tend to fall off the pedals
when coasting because their leg angle prevents gravity from
gluing their feet to the pedals.


Foot retention is an absolute must on a recumbent with the bottom
bracket higher than the seat for all but short rides. I switched from
SH55 "M" (multi-release) to SH51 "S" (single-release) SPuD cleats, after
accidentally disengaging from a pedal during climbing.

--
Tom Sherman - Near Rock Island

  #74  
Old January 2nd 05, 05:46 AM
maxo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:47:35 -0500, PSB wrote:

So which would you recommend?


Neither.

If you can't either search the classifieds for a decent affordable used
ride, or pony up a measly amount of cash for an entry level bike at your
LBS, then find another sport.


BTW, my everyday rider cost about fifty bucks at a 2nd hand store--worth a
lot more now, but you get the idea.

From what I've seen of those dept store bikes--sure they have cheap
shimano hanging on them, but all the ball bearings are ****. Having a bike
shop replace the bottom bracket on a huffy after a year is going to cost
more than the bike.

Quality bikes are the cheapest they've ever been, take advantage of that.


  #75  
Old January 2nd 05, 11:35 AM
Tom Sherman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A Muzi wrote:

Tom Sherman wrote:

When I was 13, my bicycle was a Peugeot P-8 purchased new from Andrew
Muzi/Yellow Jersey that cost ~$260 (IIRC). This was a small fortune
(for me), and you can be assured I took care of it.

When I outgrew it in my late teens, I passed it on to a relative who
commuted on it for 10+ years, until it was destroyed by a pick-up
truck driver running a stop sign. Otherwise, I expect it would still
be in use 2+ decades later.

This was the low-end of the Peugeot range, but the ride, handling,
weight, braking and shifting performance made it much more enjoyable
to ride than the ~$80 hardware store "10-speed" it replaced.



That series was robotically fillet brazed and successfully sold in good
volume at $199 to $259 - a price where European lugged frames were
prohibitively expensive at the time. (Production later moved to ProCycle
Canada)

These are sought out by the thrift store cognoscenti. Their unfiled
joints don't look all that sharp but since Peugeot used a heavier down
tube and a much lighter top tube , combined with a classic geometry,
the handling and 'road feel' are exceptional. A 'category killer' new at
$259 and once again among the '$20 used ten speeds'.


I do recall the P-8 as the one bicycle I felt confident riding hands
off. I also rode it extensively in the snow, on gravel [1], and
moderate off-road conditions with no problems.

What road bicycles available today provide similar handling and
practicality? By practicality, I would include the ability to mount
tires of at least 32-mm in width AND fenders. And are any near the
inflation adjusted price of the P-8 ($450-500)?

[1] On club rides from a few year back, it was a common occurrence for
someone on a road bike with skinny tires (25-mm) to flat any time we
traversed a section of gravel road.

--
Tom Sherman - Near Rock Island

  #76  
Old January 6th 05, 05:36 AM
Mike Kruger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ryan Cousineau" wrote in message
news:rcousine-

Even on packed gravel, I would opt for the slicks over

knobbies. About
the only urban surface a knobby can traverse that a slick

cannot is a
muddy slope long enough that you can't just power through

by
accelerating before you hit the hill. That's a pretty rare

thing, even
when making shortcuts.

Well, there's snow. Not virgin snow that you can slice
right through, but somewhat chewed up snow.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Schwinn vs Huffy PSB General 55 January 6th 05 05:36 AM
Bicycle maker Huffy seeks shield Garrison Hilliard General 4 October 22nd 04 02:25 PM
Low end schwinn... rick General 14 August 11th 04 03:59 PM
Schwinn Backpedaling Garrison Hilliard General 11 March 24th 04 02:27 PM
Schwinn Backpedaling Garrison Hilliard Techniques 9 March 22nd 04 05:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.