A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Social Issues
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 11th 13, 07:51 PM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
Anatol Zolotusky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

I'm a newbie in this group, so apologies if this question has already been discussed.

The story: this morning on my way to work I was slowly riding my bicycle out of my driveway in Palo Alto, CA, into the street, watching for incoming traffic from the left of the street. When crossing the sidewalk, I've been blindsided from my right by another cyclist (who was, of course, riding on the left sidewalk, relative to his direction). The guy knocked me down and rode over my rear wheel, thus completely ruining it. After which he said that he wasn't going to pay for my wheel, because the collision was not his fault - see, the street doesn't have the bicycle pass, so he can ride where he damn pleases. He did give his name though - Edward Berkowitz from Palo Alto.

So, the question is: do I have any recourse in such cases - perhaps for the future mishaps like this. The ******* has caused a few hundred bucks of damage, and left me literally in the dust. Does anyone have any advise, for this case, or for the future?

TIA,

--Anatol

(cross-posted from rec.bicycles.misc)
Ads
  #2  
Old June 13th 13, 01:13 AM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
EdwardDolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

"Anatol Zolotusky" wrote in message ...

I'm a newbie in this group, so apologies if this question has already been discussed.


I am shocked that anyone is left in this world who even knows about this group. It once had some glory days, but things have come to a sorry pass. It is mostly dead now, killed off by trolls and other assorted idiots.

The story: this morning on my way to work I was slowly riding my bicycle out of my driveway in Palo Alto, CA, into the street, watching for incoming traffic from the left of the street. When crossing the sidewalk, I've been blindsided from my right by another cyclist (who was, of course, riding on the left sidewalk, relative to his direction). The guy knocked me down and rode over my rear wheel, thus completely ruining it. After which he said that he wasn't going to pay for my wheel, because the collision was not his fault - see, the street doesn't have the bicycle pass, so he can ride where he damn pleases. He did give his name though - Edward Berkowitz from Palo Alto.


If it is legal to ride a bicycle on the sidewalk, then I think you are out of luck. You should have been looking to see if anyone was coming down the sidewalk as well as the street.

So, the question is: do I have any recourse in such cases - perhaps for the future mishaps like this. The ******* has caused a few hundred bucks of damage, and left me literally in the dust. Does anyone have any advise, for this case, or for the future?


Slow down and look around you when you ride a bicycle. Just be thankful that you were not hurt. I have known of guys getting hit by a bicycle and suffering serious injuries.

Ed Dolan the Great
aka
Saint Edward the Great


  #3  
Old June 13th 13, 01:51 PM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
Blackblade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 274
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

The story: this morning on my way to work I was slowly riding my bicycle out of my driveway in Palo Alto, CA, into the street, watching for incoming traffic from the left of the street. When crossing the sidewalk, I've been blindsided from my right by another cyclist (who was, of course, riding on the left sidewalk, relative to his direction). The guy knocked me down and rode over my rear wheel, thus completely ruining it. After which he said that he wasn't going to pay for my wheel, because the collision was not his fault - see, the street doesn't have the bicycle pass, so he can ride where he damn pleases. He did give his name though - Edward Berkowitz from Palo Alto.

If bicycles are permitted on the sidewalk then he is entitled to be there and the collision would probably be adjudged your fault for failing to take proper observation and then moving into his path and causing an accident.

If bicycles are not permitted on the sidewalk then he is at fault and you could take action for losses caused.
  #4  
Old July 28th 13, 05:28 PM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
Jens Müller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

Am 13.06.2013 14:51, schrieb Blackblade:
If bicycles are permitted on the sidewalk


.... then the question is, how fast are they allowed to go? Look it up in
California's Highway Code ...
  #5  
Old August 2nd 13, 01:40 PM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
Blackblade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 274
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

On Sunday, July 28, 2013 5:28:21 PM UTC+1, Jens Müller wrote:
Am 13.06.2013 14:51, schrieb Blackblade:

If bicycles are permitted on the sidewalk


... then the question is, how fast are they allowed to go? Look it up in

California's Highway Code ...


I would say this is, in reality, irrelevant because you don't know the speed that the bike was travelling.
  #6  
Old August 3rd 13, 05:38 AM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
EdwardDolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

"Blackblade" wrote in message ...

On Sunday, July 28, 2013 5:28:21 PM UTC+1, Jens Müller wrote:
Am 13.06.2013 14:51, schrieb Blackblade:

If bicycles are permitted on the sidewalk


... then the question is, how fast are they allowed to go? Look it up in

California's Highway Code ...


I would say this is, in reality, irrelevant because you don't know the speed that the bike was travelling.


Anyone who is affected by a bicycle on a sidewalk should take a cue from hikers on trails who have to constantly dodge cyclists at the risk of their life and limb. Cyclists never have any idea of how they affect anyone else. That is because they are childish and like all children can see no further than the tip of their noses.

Ed Dolan the Great
aka
Saint Edward the Great


  #7  
Old August 5th 13, 01:17 AM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
T0m $herman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 612
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

On 6/12/2013 7:13 PM, EdwardDolan wrote:
I am shocked that anyone is left in this world who even knows about this
group. It once had some glory days, but things have come to a sorry
pass. It is mostly dead now, killed off by trolls and other assorted idiots.


Do not be so hard on yourself, Mr. Ed Dolan.

--
T0m $herm@n
  #8  
Old August 5th 13, 03:58 AM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
EdwardDolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

"T0m $herman" wrote in message ...

On 6/12/2013 7:13 PM, EdwardDolan wrote:
I am shocked that anyone is left in this world who even knows about this
group. It once had some glory days, but things have come to a sorry
pass. It is mostly dead now, killed off by trolls and other assorted idiots.


Do not be so hard on yourself, Mr. Ed Dolan.


Mr. Tom Sherman was a former mainstay of quite a few of these cycling groups on Usenet. He was perhaps its greatest advocate of “post free or dieâ€. However, human nature being what it is, such free forums were impossible as we all eventually discovered. What destroys unmonitored newsgroups are all the “trolls and other assorted idiots†who know no bounds on their free speech.

The one thing Ed Dolan did that Tom Sherman never did was to take on all these idiots and give them a taste of their own medicine. Many a battle was fought and won by yours truly, but the end result was that the newsgroups were destroyed. The silences of the Tom Sherman’s of this world means that the lowest common denominator will always win out as every person with half a brain falls silent. I felt it was far better that a newsgroup cease to exist than that it be dominated by morons and idiots. Tom Sherman was neither a moron nor an idiot, but his silences were always deafening when things got hot. I attributed it to moral cowardice, but it may be that he had a stake in the world and needed to guard his privacy.

It is good riddance to Usenet newsgroups, with or without monitors. They may have served a function when the Internet was new, but have now become nothing but a remembrance of a past festival in which certain individuals gloried in their knowledge of one trivial thing or another. Only the Great Ed Dolan, who is also a Great Saint, remains to kick its dead ass.

Ed Dolan the Great
aka
Saint Edward the Great


  #9  
Old August 5th 13, 05:37 AM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
T0m $herman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 612
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

On 8/4/2013 9:58 PM, EdwardDolan wrote:
"T0m $herman" wrote in message ...
On 6/12/2013 7:13 PM, EdwardDolan wrote:
I am shocked that anyone is left in this world who even knows about this
group. It once had some glory days, but things have come to a sorry
pass. It is mostly dead now, killed off by trolls and other assorted

idiots.
Do not be so hard on yourself, Mr. Ed Dolan.

Mr. Tom Sherman was a former mainstay of quite a few of these cycling
groups on Usenet. He was perhaps its greatest advocate of “post free or
dieâ€. However, human nature being what it is, such free forums were
impossible as we all eventually discovered. What destroys unmonitored
newsgroups are all the “trolls and other assorted idiots†who know no
bounds on their free speech.
The one thing Ed Dolan did that Tom Sherman never did was to take on all
these idiots and give them a taste of their own medicine. Many a battle
was fought and won by yours truly, but the end result was that the
newsgroups were destroyed. The silences of the Tom Sherman’s of this
world means that the lowest common denominator will always win out as
every person with half a brain falls silent. I felt it was far better
that a newsgroup cease to exist than that it be dominated by morons and
idiots. Tom Sherman was neither a moron nor an idiot, but his silences
were always deafening when things got hot. I attributed it to moral
cowardice, but it may be that he had a stake in the world and needed to
guard his privacy.
It is good riddance to Usenet newsgroups, with or without monitors. They
may have served a function when the Internet was new, but have now
become nothing but a remembrance of a past festival in which certain
individuals gloried in their knowledge of one trivial thing or another.
Only the Great Ed Dolan, who is also a Great Saint, remains to kick its
dead ass.
Ed Dolan the Great
aka
Saint Edward the Great


Gnaw [1], just that the people on the bicycle newsgroups are generally
civil enough that they do not need telling off. I will and have told
people off when they were being treasonous while hiding behind the
pretense of being politically correct; I have no problems with telling
someone that they are filth who deserves to die if that is really the
case. Or just to go **** themselves, if they are of limited
comprehension.

[1] A datakollism.

--
T0m $herm@n
  #10  
Old August 5th 13, 06:42 AM posted to rec.bicycles.soc
EdwardDolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 538
Default Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike?

"T0m $herman" wrote in message ...

On 8/4/2013 9:58 PM, EdwardDolan wrote:
"T0m $herman" wrote in message ...
On 6/12/2013 7:13 PM, EdwardDolan wrote:


I am shocked that anyone is left in this world who even knows about this
group. It once had some glory days, but things have come to a sorry
pass. It is mostly dead now, killed off by trolls and other assorted

idiots.


Do not be so hard on yourself, Mr. Ed Dolan.


Mr. Tom Sherman was a former mainstay of quite a few of these cycling
groups on Usenet. He was perhaps its greatest advocate of “post free or
dieâ€. However, human nature being what it is, such free forums were
impossible as we all eventually discovered. What destroys unmonitored
newsgroups are all the “trolls and other assorted idiots†who know no
bounds on their free speech.
The one thing Ed Dolan did that Tom Sherman never did was to take on all
these idiots and give them a taste of their own medicine. Many a battle
was fought and won by yours truly, but the end result was that the
newsgroups were destroyed. The silences of the Tom Sherman’s of this
world means that the lowest common denominator will always win out as
every person with half a brain falls silent. I felt it was far better
that a newsgroup cease to exist than that it be dominated by morons and
idiots. Tom Sherman was neither a moron nor an idiot, but his silences
were always deafening when things got hot. I attributed it to moral
cowardice, but it may be that he had a stake in the world and needed to
guard his privacy.
It is good riddance to Usenet newsgroups, with or without monitors. They
may have served a function when the Internet was new, but have now
become nothing but a remembrance of a past festival in which certain
individuals gloried in their knowledge of one trivial thing or another.
Only the Great Ed Dolan, who is also a Great Saint, remains to kick its
dead ass.
Ed Dolan the Great
aka
Saint Edward the Great


Gnaw [1], just that the people on the bicycle newsgroups are generally

civil enough that they do not need telling off. I will and have told
people off when they were being treasonous while hiding behind the
pretense of being politically correct; I have no problems with telling
someone that they are filth who deserves to die if that is really the
case. Or just to go **** themselves, if they are of limited
comprehension.

[1] A datakollism.


Yes, but only when your ox was being gored. I took on any and all who presented an affront to civility and common sense. I did not limit myself to any parochial interests. I had the interests of the newsgroup as a whole at heart whereas you were notorious for absenting yourself when things got hot. You did nothing to save the group when it was terminal.

Further, the bicycle newsgroups were notorious for being left of center politically and in every other way. You were about as politically correct as they come. It was only your tirade against Israel and the Jews that got you into a bit of trouble. Conservatives on these newsgroups were as rare as diamonds in the rough ... of which I was the exemplar of the type. But of course everyone knows that 1 conservative is the equivalent of 10,000 liberals.

Ed Dolan the Great
aka
Saint Edward the Great


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any recourse when negligently hit by another bike? Anatol Zolotusky General 6 August 7th 13 06:49 PM
For Sale: Bike, Bike, Bike, Bike, Frame, and wheels. gplama[_137_] Australia 53 July 3rd 07 09:37 AM
road bike / race bike / hybrid / touring / fitness bike - which one Maurice Wibblington UK 44 September 27th 06 10:53 PM
road bike / race bike / hybrid / touring / fitness bike - CHOSEN AND BOUGHT Maurice Wibblington UK 26 September 27th 06 11:56 AM
We've had the row bike, kick bike, treadmill bike (yes really) now the..... PiledHigher Australia 0 August 4th 06 07:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.