#141
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On 3/15/2017 10:53 AM, David Scheidt wrote:
Sir Ridesalot wrote: :I remember burning out bulbs with my bottle dynamo if I rode really :fast. I also remember the slipping problems when the wheels were wet even :when I used the rubber boot sold to go on the bottle dynamo roller. Hub :dynamos today really seem to fall down at slow speeds. Mine work fine from walking speeds. They produce more light at higher speeds, but at slow speeds you don't need it, because you're not moving fast. That's my experience too. The last time I recall not having enough light at low speeds was in a dark campground with a pre-halogen dynamo light with lousy optics. That was about 1980, IIRC. With the modern LED dynamo lights, it's never even come close to happening, even at walking speed. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Ads |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On 3/14/2017 10:57 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:19:22 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 3/13/2017 2:06 PM, Joerg wrote: Then you'd be back to this inferior dynamo lighting which goes out at the traffic light, or uses dimmed or short-lived light if there is a supercap installed. Where are the tragic tales of cyclists who are seriously injured or killed because their dynamo standlights were too dim or too short-lived? Somehow those tales have failed to make it into the safety literature! There are no such tales because a cyclist that is not in motion could be considered a pedestrian. "Pedestrian Deaths Make Up a Rising Share of U.S. Traffic Fatalities" http://usa.streetsblog.org/2016/03/09/pedestrian-deaths-make-up-a-rising-share-of-u-s-traffic-fatalities/ "In a typical year, nearly 5,000 Americans are killed while walking". I wonder how many of those were actually cyclists walking their bicycles or waiting at a stop sign or signal (with or without a stand light)? I suspect the answer is zero. Especially those waiting at stop signs or signals. But a cyclist walking his bike _is_ a pedestrian, and has no more legal or practical need for a light than a pedestrian does. Sometimes when walking at night, I'll carry a small flashlight. But people do not normally do that. Think back to the last few times you parked your car and walked from the car to a store or movie theater at night. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On 3/14/2017 11:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:09:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: But the point I was discussing was whether too brief or too dim standlights really kill or seriously injure _stationary_ bicyclists. I've never heard of such a case. I think it's yet another exaggerated danger. Bicycle lighting seems to be divided into "see where your going" and "be seen" parts. Standlights are in the "be seen" part. If so, then using a relatively narrow forward facing headlight is inadequate and a poor substitute for all around "be seen" type lighting. So far, no driver has tried to kill me while I'm stationary, but it's possible. To help prevent such a threat, I would need all around illumination because I don't know from what direction the driver might approach and I do NOT need to see where I'm going (because I'm not going anywhere). Some kind of flashing headband, flashing arm bands, or maybe downward facing flood lights to illuminate an area. Maybe an LED illuminated vest, which is now popular among highway workers: https://www.amazon.com/HIGH-VISIBILITY-VEST-COMPLIANT-REFLECTIVE/dp/B01L2US0EY https://www.amazon.com/SE-EP08L-Illuminated-Flashing-Feature/dp/B008WAE2XQ https://www.amazon.com/SE-EP07L-Flashing-Illuminated-Safety/dp/B004J663A2 I don't know which type of "be seen" lighting might be most effective, but any of the aformentioned would be better than a dim forward facing standlight. Thing is, nobody's demonstrated any need for so much stationary "be seen" light, beyond the usual "well, it _could_ happen" safety inflation mentality. We're facing the same mentality regarding our local forest preserve. Some people want to cut down every dead or dying tree within 100 feet of any trail because, well, it _could_ fall on somebody and kill them. Sheesh. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 2:05:09 PM UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/14/2017 10:57 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:19:22 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 3/13/2017 2:06 PM, Joerg wrote: Then you'd be back to this inferior dynamo lighting which goes out at the traffic light, or uses dimmed or short-lived light if there is a supercap installed. Where are the tragic tales of cyclists who are seriously injured or killed because their dynamo standlights were too dim or too short-lived? Somehow those tales have failed to make it into the safety literature! There are no such tales because a cyclist that is not in motion could be considered a pedestrian. "Pedestrian Deaths Make Up a Rising Share of U.S. Traffic Fatalities" http://usa.streetsblog.org/2016/03/09/pedestrian-deaths-make-up-a-rising-share-of-u-s-traffic-fatalities/ "In a typical year, nearly 5,000 Americans are killed while walking". I wonder how many of those were actually cyclists walking their bicycles or waiting at a stop sign or signal (with or without a stand light)? I suspect the answer is zero. Especially those waiting at stop signs or signals. But a cyclist walking his bike _is_ a pedestrian, and has no more legal or practical need for a light than a pedestrian does. Sometimes when walking at night, I'll carry a small flashlight. But people do not normally do that. Think back to the last few times you parked your car and walked from the car to a store or movie theater at night. - - Frank Krygowski I see a lot more people at night wearing a reflective vest or carrying a flashlight than I did five or ten years ago. It seems too that a lot of pedestrians are very concerned about distracted drivers. Cheers |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 2:08:49 PM UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/14/2017 11:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:09:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: But the point I was discussing was whether too brief or too dim standlights really kill or seriously injure _stationary_ bicyclists. I've never heard of such a case. I think it's yet another exaggerated danger. Bicycle lighting seems to be divided into "see where your going" and "be seen" parts. Standlights are in the "be seen" part. If so, then using a relatively narrow forward facing headlight is inadequate and a poor substitute for all around "be seen" type lighting. So far, no driver has tried to kill me while I'm stationary, but it's possible. To help prevent such a threat, I would need all around illumination because I don't know from what direction the driver might approach and I do NOT need to see where I'm going (because I'm not going anywhere). Some kind of flashing headband, flashing arm bands, or maybe downward facing flood lights to illuminate an area. Maybe an LED illuminated vest, which is now popular among highway workers: https://www.amazon.com/HIGH-VISIBILITY-VEST-COMPLIANT-REFLECTIVE/dp/B01L2US0EY https://www.amazon.com/SE-EP08L-Illuminated-Flashing-Feature/dp/B008WAE2XQ https://www.amazon.com/SE-EP07L-Flashing-Illuminated-Safety/dp/B004J663A2 I don't know which type of "be seen" lighting might be most effective, but any of the aformentioned would be better than a dim forward facing standlight. Thing is, nobody's demonstrated any need for so much stationary "be seen" light, beyond the usual "well, it _could_ happen" safety inflation mentality. We're facing the same mentality regarding our local forest preserve. Some people want to cut down every dead or dying tree within 100 feet of any trail because, well, it _could_ fall on somebody and kill them. Sheesh. -- - Frank Krygowski I remember the Soubitez (sp?) ads from the 1980s that showed a stopped bicycle without a front light at an intersection at night and another image of the Soubitez dynamo light with the standlight. The ad was about how much safer yuo were with the Soubitez dynamo because others could see the light whilst you were stopped or just starting up again. So this perceived need for a safety standlight on a dynamo powered light is nothing new. Cheers |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
jbeattie wrote:
:On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 7:53:52 AM UTC-7, David Scheidt wrote: : Sir Ridesalot wrote: : : :I remember burning out bulbs with my bottle dynamo if I rode really : :fast. I also remember the slipping problems when the wheels were wet even : :when I used the rubber boot sold to go on the bottle dynamo roller. Hub : :dynamos today really seem to fall down at slow speeds. : : Mine work fine from walking speeds. They produce more light at higher : speeds, but at slow speeds you don't need it, because you're not : moving fast. : :I sometimes need light most at slow speeds, when I'm creeping up hills and trying not to fall into giant pot holes. I assure you the potholes in Chicago are as least as big as yours, and my lights are fine for finding them as slow as I can ride a bike upright. Perhaps your hub is defective. -- sig 102 |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 10:20:10 AM UTC-7, Doug Landau wrote:
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 9:45:34 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 7:53:52 AM UTC-7, David Scheidt wrote: Sir Ridesalot wrote: :I remember burning out bulbs with my bottle dynamo if I rode really :fast. I also remember the slipping problems when the wheels were wet even :when I used the rubber boot sold to go on the bottle dynamo roller. Hub :dynamos today really seem to fall down at slow speeds. Mine work fine from walking speeds. They produce more light at higher speeds, but at slow speeds you don't need it, because you're not moving fast. I sometimes need light most at slow speeds, when I'm creeping up hills and trying not to fall into giant pot holes. -- Jay Beattie. Where are you on Strava No Strava. No Garmin. My cyclometer is broken. I might as well be back in the stoneage. -- Jay Beattie. |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 12:19:18 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 10:20:10 AM UTC-7, Doug Landau wrote: On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 9:45:34 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 7:53:52 AM UTC-7, David Scheidt wrote: Sir Ridesalot wrote: :I remember burning out bulbs with my bottle dynamo if I rode really :fast. I also remember the slipping problems when the wheels were wet even :when I used the rubber boot sold to go on the bottle dynamo roller. Hub :dynamos today really seem to fall down at slow speeds. Mine work fine from walking speeds. They produce more light at higher speeds, but at slow speeds you don't need it, because you're not moving fast. I sometimes need light most at slow speeds, when I'm creeping up hills and trying not to fall into giant pot holes. -- Jay Beattie. Where are you on Strava No Strava. No Garmin. My cyclometer is broken. I might as well be back in the stoneage. -- Jay Beattie. Strava's just for fun. I don't use a cyclometer any more. I just count rear tires and multiply by 1500 now. |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On 3/15/2017 2:43 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 2:05:09 PM UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 3/14/2017 10:57 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:19:22 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 3/13/2017 2:06 PM, Joerg wrote: Then you'd be back to this inferior dynamo lighting which goes out at the traffic light, or uses dimmed or short-lived light if there is a supercap installed. Where are the tragic tales of cyclists who are seriously injured or killed because their dynamo standlights were too dim or too short-lived? Somehow those tales have failed to make it into the safety literature! There are no such tales because a cyclist that is not in motion could be considered a pedestrian. "Pedestrian Deaths Make Up a Rising Share of U.S. Traffic Fatalities" http://usa.streetsblog.org/2016/03/09/pedestrian-deaths-make-up-a-rising-share-of-u-s-traffic-fatalities/ "In a typical year, nearly 5,000 Americans are killed while walking". I wonder how many of those were actually cyclists walking their bicycles or waiting at a stop sign or signal (with or without a stand light)? I suspect the answer is zero. Especially those waiting at stop signs or signals. But a cyclist walking his bike _is_ a pedestrian, and has no more legal or practical need for a light than a pedestrian does. Sometimes when walking at night, I'll carry a small flashlight. But people do not normally do that. Think back to the last few times you parked your car and walked from the car to a store or movie theater at night. - - Frank Krygowski I see a lot more people at night wearing a reflective vest or carrying a flashlight than I did five or ten years ago. It seems too that a lot of pedestrians are very concerned about distracted drivers. Sure. Safety inflation is a real thing. Ten years ago, walking on a sidewalk did not trigger a need for a luminous vest. Now I see people wearing those things even on sidewalks. So why the change? Is it because it's really gotten so much more dangerous? I doubt it. Pedestrian fatalities did jump up a bit in the last year for which I find NHTSA data (2014) but they jumped up to a number less than the one for 2004. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
More About Lights
On 3/15/2017 2:48 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 2:08:49 PM UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 3/14/2017 11:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:09:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: But the point I was discussing was whether too brief or too dim standlights really kill or seriously injure _stationary_ bicyclists. I've never heard of such a case. I think it's yet another exaggerated danger. Bicycle lighting seems to be divided into "see where your going" and "be seen" parts. Standlights are in the "be seen" part. If so, then using a relatively narrow forward facing headlight is inadequate and a poor substitute for all around "be seen" type lighting. So far, no driver has tried to kill me while I'm stationary, but it's possible. To help prevent such a threat, I would need all around illumination because I don't know from what direction the driver might approach and I do NOT need to see where I'm going (because I'm not going anywhere). Some kind of flashing headband, flashing arm bands, or maybe downward facing flood lights to illuminate an area. Maybe an LED illuminated vest, which is now popular among highway workers: https://www.amazon.com/HIGH-VISIBILITY-VEST-COMPLIANT-REFLECTIVE/dp/B01L2US0EY https://www.amazon.com/SE-EP08L-Illuminated-Flashing-Feature/dp/B008WAE2XQ https://www.amazon.com/SE-EP07L-Flashing-Illuminated-Safety/dp/B004J663A2 I don't know which type of "be seen" lighting might be most effective, but any of the aformentioned would be better than a dim forward facing standlight. Thing is, nobody's demonstrated any need for so much stationary "be seen" light, beyond the usual "well, it _could_ happen" safety inflation mentality. We're facing the same mentality regarding our local forest preserve. Some people want to cut down every dead or dying tree within 100 feet of any trail because, well, it _could_ fall on somebody and kill them. Sheesh. -- - Frank Krygowski I remember the Soubitez (sp?) ads from the 1980s that showed a stopped bicycle without a front light at an intersection at night and another image of the Soubitez dynamo light with the standlight. The ad was about how much safer yuo were with the Soubitez dynamo because others could see the light whilst you were stopped or just starting up again. So this perceived need for a safety standlight on a dynamo powered light is nothing new. As I recall, that system failed in the marketplace. The idea might have existed in a few minds back then, but it wasn't common enough to be commercially successful. The same could be said of many present "safety" devices. You'd have gone broke trying to sell "walker safety vests" in the 1970s or 1980s. Ditto little hammers to let you break your car window if you were trapped inside. Or foam pads to put on the corner of every hard object your toddler might walk by. Or bathtub mats that say "HOT" when the water is, well, hot. But all those things have been sold recently. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dynamo Lights viz Battery Lights in snow qand slush? | Sir Ridesalot | Techniques | 6 | March 4th 15 10:36 PM |
No lights, dark clothing, no reflectives, no street lights. | Mrcheerful | UK | 153 | November 4th 14 09:19 AM |
Maybe it's safer to run red lights than to wait for green lights. | SMS | General | 16 | September 24th 08 09:51 PM |
Light Theft (solutions — small pocket lights, or heavy duty well secured lights?) | David Johnson | UK | 24 | August 29th 07 02:32 PM |
Break lights turn lights and handle bar lights | Truepurple | Techniques | 30 | November 17th 03 04:02 AM |