|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
Whatever the outcome of the vote, I will respect it in the name of
democracy. But where is the result? Did I miss something? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:13:27 +0000 (UTC), Mr. Benn %%@%%.% wrote:
Whatever the outcome of the vote, I will respect it in the name of democracy. But where is the result? Did I miss something? Wrong group to ask about it. The votetaker don't read this group. But from previous replies the count is still on-going. The vote- taker has apologised as real life (in a variety of guises) has intruded on his task. -- Andy Leighton = "The Lord is my shepherd, but we still lost the sheep dog trials" - Robert Rankin, _They Came And Ate Us_ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
"Andy Leighton" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:13:27 +0000 (UTC), Mr. Benn %%@%%.% wrote: Whatever the outcome of the vote, I will respect it in the name of democracy. But where is the result? Did I miss something? Wrong group to ask about it. The votetaker don't read this group. But from previous replies the count is still on-going. The vote- taker has apologised as real life (in a variety of guises) has intruded on his task. Blimey, the voting finished 20 days ago. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:19:23
uk.rec.cycling Mr Benn "Andy Leighton" wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:13:27 +0000 (UTC), Mr. Benn %%@%%.% wrote: Whatever the outcome of the vote, I will respect it in the name of democracy. But where is the result? Did I miss something? Wrong group to ask about it. The votetaker don't read this group. But from previous replies the count is still on-going. The vote- taker has apologised as real life (in a variety of guises) has intruded on his task. Blimey, the voting finished 20 days ago. I suspect he has a lot of loose socks to match up. The vast majority of the valid votes will have been counted and verified in a day or two. -- Wm... Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
On 2009-08-26, Wm... wrote:
I suspect he has a lot of loose socks to match up. The vast majority of the valid votes will have been counted and verified in a day or two. Lost in the dryer? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:58:55
uk.rec.cycling Adam Funk On 2009-08-26, Wm... wrote: I suspect he has a lot of loose socks to match up. The vast majority of the valid votes will have been counted and verified in a day or two. Lost in the dryer? No, no, no. Even the loose socks get hung out to dry. As any person with a washing line knows, other people's washing is invariably more interesting than your own. -- Wm... Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
In message , at 02:07:48 on Wed, 26
Aug 2009, Andy Leighton wibbled On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:13:27 +0000 (UTC), Mr. Benn %%@%%.% wrote: Whatever the outcome of the vote, I will respect it in the name of democracy. But where is the result? Did I miss something? Wrong group to ask about it. The votetaker don't read this group. The votetaker is reading this group as the RFD and CFV were posted here. But from previous replies the count is still on-going. The vote- taker has apologised as real life (in a variety of guises) has intruded on his task. Indeed, including after the previous bug, also having swine flu - something I cannot recommend - plus a couple of other unexpected bits of RL. The result is on its way. Control should be posting it by the middle of next week as there's three working days on the UKV internal list to come. -- Pedt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:48:50
uk.rec.cycling Pedt "\"@ In message , at 02:07:48 on Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Andy Leighton wibbled On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:13:27 +0000 (UTC), Mr. Benn %%@%%.% wrote: Whatever the outcome of the vote, I will respect it in the name of democracy. But where is the result? Did I miss something? Wrong group to ask about it. The votetaker don't read this group. The votetaker is reading this group as the RFD and CFV were posted here. I don't think it is compulsory after the vote end. But from previous replies the count is still on-going. The vote- taker has apologised as real life (in a variety of guises) has intruded on his task. Indeed, including after the previous bug, also having swine flu - something I cannot recommend - plus a couple of other unexpected bits of RL. RL, such an unfortunate thing The result is on its way. Control should be posting it by the middle of next week as there's three working days on the UKV internal list to come. fx:clears throat you said come, Judith will now accuse you of perversion More generally, thanks Pedt. -- Wm... Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
"Pedt" "\"@ wrote in message
... The result is on its way. Control should be posting it by the middle of next week as there's three working days on the UKV internal list to come. -- Pedt Many thanks for the update. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to the urcm voting results?
In article ,
Pedt wrote: Indeed, including after the previous bug, also having swine flu - something I cannot recommend You have our sympathy. I have to say that although there are some pretty vile opponents of this proposal, I hadn't though that they would go so far as to send you ballot papers contaminated with swine flu. -- Ian Jackson personal email: These opinions are my own. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/ PGP2 key 1024R/0x23f5addb, fingerprint 5906F687 BD03ACAD 0D8E602E FCF37657 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[email protected] | jms | UK | 26 | July 19th 09 07:40 PM |
[email protected] | jms | UK | 9 | July 8th 09 07:50 PM |
[email protected] | jms | UK | 2 | July 8th 09 04:11 PM |
[email protected] | jms | UK | 0 | July 7th 09 12:10 PM |
Re Proposed URCM | jms | UK | 9 | May 29th 09 04:12 PM |