|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
3ft passing requirement revisited
I've wondered whether cyclists really need a law that requires cars to pass
us no closer than 3 feet. I generally don't have too many issues out on the road, and it would seem that common sense and courtesy go a long way towards making the world a reasonable place to drive and bike. Until today. I didn't even really know what happened until I played it back in mind mind immediately afterward. Karl, Kevin and I were on the return leg of our usual Tuesday/Thursday morning ride, heading north on 84 in Woodside, approaching Tripp Road. We were not only single file, but single file on the very edge of the road... I mean riding in tight formation, with maybe just a couple inches (really) of pavement to the right of our wheels. If there was a "good citizen" award for cyclists sharing the road, we would have gotten it. No reason for us to impede cars if we don't have to (the shoulder's in pretty good shape there, and being the first day of school for many, there was more traffic than usual). And then the black SUV went past us. It didn't blast its horn. It didn't swerve. It simply didn't deviate from its course. And it passed each of us by maybe, what, 6 inches? Could have even been a bit less. It was RIGHT THERE. If one of us had had to swerve for an obstacle, it would have been game over. If the car had had to move over just a little bit to let a wide car pass in the other direction, game over. If one of us had chosen that exact time to look back and check traffic, and moved out into the road just a little bit (as often happens when you look back), it might have been game over. As it was, there was this immediate sense of marvel at the precision with which the car passed us, the three of us riding perfectly straight, with the car just inches away from our left hands. It was an almost unbelievable experience. But within seconds that amazement was replaced with one of those "What just happened?" feelings, and the more I play it back in my mind, the more upset and annoyed I become. That car should not have passed us in that manner, which means it should have waited until it was clear in the other direction so it could give us a bit more room, instead of assuming that "Share the road" means making assumptions of a perfect world at 24 miles per hour. So I'm changing my tune, and not just asking for a 3 foot passing law for cyclists, but demanding it. A relatively-narrow two-lane road (like 84 near Tripp, specifically right near the "singing gas pipes" on the west side of the road) is no place for 3 bikes & two cars to share the same strip of road. The car should have waited until it could pass us with reasonable clearance, and there obviously needs to be a law defining what "reasonable clearance" is because I doubt that particular driver thought he or she was doing something reckless. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
36" Unicycle Inseam Requirement | 1-wheeled-grape | Unicycling | 3 | July 3rd 08 02:28 AM |
36" Unicycle Inseam Requirement | kington99 | Unicycling | 4 | July 2nd 08 04:08 PM |
36" Unicycle Inseam Requirement | Vipassana | Unicycling | 2 | July 2nd 08 01:13 AM |
In passing... | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 4 | May 18th 07 03:57 PM |
Passing on the right....... | Claire Petersky | General | 109 | May 23rd 05 09:44 AM |