Brazilian motorists are no better

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.

On 21/03/2013 22:48, Squashme wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.

Nah. Might get blood on the paintwork.

Prolly get one of these stickers though;

http://api.ning.com/files/9SUgSLXlVn....JPG?width=721

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.

"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.



Maybe this is why cyclists never give arm signals? Well that one will have
a bit more difficulty from now on.

On 23/03/2013 18:23, Mrcheerful wrote:
"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.



Maybe this is why cyclists never give arm signals? Well that one will have
a bit more difficulty from now on.



Believe it or not (and this is going to be a really tough cookie to
swallow) some drivers don't actually take any notice of an arm signal.
All they do is try to get past a wee bit quicker in case the cyclist
decides to move over or turn in that direction.

?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Crappy driving at its worst.

On 24/03/2013 16:36, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 23/03/2013 18:23, Mrcheerful wrote:
"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.



Maybe this is why cyclists never give arm signals? Well that one will
have
a bit more difficulty from now on.



Believe it or not (and this is going to be a really tough cookie to
swallow) some drivers don't actually take any notice of an arm signal.

Why should they? Cyclists are a bit dim.


All they do is try to get past a wee bit quicker in case the cyclist
decides to move over or turn in that direction.

Quite right. Who would want to be delayed by a sponging freeloader @ 12mph?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Crappy cycling at its worst.

IFYPFY
--
Dave-Cyclists VORT
Motorists pay £45 billion a year in extra taxes, specifically so they
can use the roads.
Only £10 billion of this is spent on roads.

On 24/03/2013 16:48, Dave-Cyclists VORT wrote:
On 24/03/2013 16:36, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 23/03/2013 18:23, Mrcheerful wrote:
"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.



Maybe this is why cyclists never give arm signals? Well that one will
have
a bit more difficulty from now on.



Believe it or not (and this is going to be a really tough cookie to
swallow) some drivers don't actually take any notice of an arm signal.

Why should they? Cyclists are a bit dim.


All they do is try to get past a wee bit quicker in case the cyclist
decides to move over or turn in that direction.

Quite right. Who would want to be delayed by a sponging freeloader @
12mph?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Crappy cycling at its worst.

IFYPFY

QED.

The cyclist is crap because he signals. No, the cyclist is crap because
he does not signal. The cyclist is crap either way. Therefore with so
much ‘crappy’ cycling going on, drivers should take more care.

On 24/03/2013 17:06, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 24/03/2013 16:48, Dave-Cyclists VORT wrote:
On 24/03/2013 16:36, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 23/03/2013 18:23, Mrcheerful wrote:
"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme

wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.



Maybe this is why cyclists never give arm signals? Well that one will
have
a bit more difficulty from now on.



Believe it or not (and this is going to be a really tough cookie to
swallow) some drivers don't actually take any notice of an arm signal.

Why should they? Cyclists are a bit dim.


All they do is try to get past a wee bit quicker in case the cyclist
decides to move over or turn in that direction.

Quite right. Who would want to be delayed by a sponging freeloader @
12mph?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Crappy cycling at its worst.

IFYPFY

QED.

The cyclist is crap because he signals. No, the cyclist is crap because
he does not signal. The cyclist is crap either way. Therefore with so
much ‘crappy’ cycling going on, drivers should take more care.

Missing the point again, dimwit.

Obviously cyclists are, in general, crap.

No motorist is going to trust the signal from a cyclist.

The logic is as follows;

He is riding a push bike.
A push bike isn't a viable form of transport.
Therefore he must be a bit thick.
If he is that thick, his signals can't be relied on.



--
Dave-Cyclists VORT
Motorists pay £45 billion a year in extra taxes, specifically so they
can use the roads.
Only £10 billion of this is spent on roads.

On 24/03/2013 17:34, Dave-Cyclists VORT wrote:
On 24/03/2013 17:06, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 24/03/2013 16:48, Dave-Cyclists VORT wrote:
On 24/03/2013 16:36, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 23/03/2013 18:23, Mrcheerful wrote:
"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme

wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.



Maybe this is why cyclists never give arm signals? Well that one will
have
a bit more difficulty from now on.



Believe it or not (and this is going to be a really tough cookie to
swallow) some drivers don't actually take any notice of an arm signal.

Why should they? Cyclists are a bit dim.


All they do is try to get past a wee bit quicker in case the cyclist
decides to move over or turn in that direction.

Quite right. Who would want to be delayed by a sponging freeloader @
12mph?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Crappy cycling at its worst.

IFYPFY

QED.

The cyclist is crap because he signals. No, the cyclist is crap because
he does not signal. The cyclist is crap either way. Therefore with so
much ‘crappy’ cycling going on, drivers should take more care.

Missing the point again, dimwit.

Obviously cyclists are, in general, crap.

No motorist is going to trust the signal from a cyclist.

Exactly the point.

The logic is as follows;

He is riding a push bike.
A push bike isn't a viable form of transport.
Therefore he must be a bit thick.
If he is that thick, his signals can't be relied on.


Therefore take more care as you don't know what the idiot is going to do.

Simples!

On 24/03/2013 18:12, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 24/03/2013 17:34, Dave-Cyclists VORT wrote:
On 24/03/2013 17:06, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 24/03/2013 16:48, Dave-Cyclists VORT wrote:
On 24/03/2013 16:36, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 23/03/2013 18:23, Mrcheerful wrote:
"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT), Squashme

wrote:


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21736724

Car mascot idea for Dave.


I bet he had his hand through the window trying to nick something.



Maybe this is why cyclists never give arm signals? Well that one
will
have
a bit more difficulty from now on.



Believe it or not (and this is going to be a really tough cookie to
swallow) some drivers don't actually take any notice of an arm signal.

Why should they? Cyclists are a bit dim.


All they do is try to get past a wee bit quicker in case the cyclist
decides to move over or turn in that direction.

Quite right. Who would want to be delayed by a sponging freeloader @
12mph?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????

Crappy cycling at its worst.

IFYPFY

QED.

The cyclist is crap because he signals. No, the cyclist is crap because
he does not signal. The cyclist is crap either way. Therefore with so
much ‘crappy’ cycling going on, drivers should take more care.

Missing the point again, dimwit.

Obviously cyclists are, in general, crap.

No motorist is going to trust the signal from a cyclist.

Exactly the point.

So you cofirm cyclists signals are untrustworthy?

The logic is as follows;

He is riding a push bike.
A push bike isn't a viable form of transport.
Therefore he must be a bit thick.
If he is that thick, his signals can't be relied on.


Therefore take more care as you don't know what the idiot is going to do.

The 'idiot' bit is correct - for cyclists.

Simples!

Cyclists are.

--
Dave-Cyclists VORT
Motorists pay £45 billion a year in extra taxes, specifically so they
can use the roads.
Only £10 billion of this is spent on roads.