Where is Tom Sherman? Second Query

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
ups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

[newsgroups trimmed]

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
As long as off-topic posts do not interfere with those that are
on-topic
it
does not matter. Your good buddy Ed Gin knew how to interfere with
every
post no matter whether it was on-topic or off-topic. That is
because
he
was
a troll with his insane drivel. That is something Tom Sherman and I
never
were. Too bad you can't tell the difference.

Now who is taking liberty with netiquette??? Off-topic by
definition
is just that ... off-topic no matter what kind of spin you vainly
attemnpt to put on it. Don't confuse the issue by introducing
irrelevant information regaridng the diferrences between Gin, you
and
Sherman that isn't even accurate. Tom Sherman might be accused of
drivel, but a troll he was not. You and Gin both qualify as trolls
who
employed insane drivel. Too bad you can't tell the difference
between
on-topic, off-topic and what is appropriate in terms of netiquette.
I
refer you to my previous explanation. Perhaps if you read it a
second
time, it will sink in.

Nope, other newsgroups are just chock full of off-topic drivel. Your only
complaint is that my drivel is better than your drivel.

And I made this complaint where pray tell? Where is you evidence in
support of this fabfication?

The complaint is there underlying your every sentence. It was like that with
Ed Gin and Tom Sherman too. You need to find your own topics and not be
sponging off others all the time.

What a pitiful retort. I have never stated explicity or implitiy
(complained) that your drivel is better than my drivel. Unlke you, I
don't even regard what I write as drivel. Prove me wrong and cite a
specific example to corroborate yout unsubstantiated assertion. You
cna't can you.

I know exactly what is on-topic and what is off-topic. I choose to
post
mainly to off-topic threads and I will create off-topic subjects on an
on-topic thread that has exhausted itself. I do this to provide some
interest and some amusement to the poor earnest members of ARBR.
However,
much of what I do falls under the category of housekeeping which is
really
not off-topic. It is quite necessary to have someone around like me
who
will
look after the best interests of the group. I am Mr. ARBR himself
because
of
my general concern for the group.

You know not the meaning of the word netiquette and houskeeping is
merely a euphemistic rationalization for your off-topic banter. If you
were genuinely concerned for ARBR, you'd take leave of the forum as
many have requested you to. No one except Mike Vandeman appreciates
your presence here.

ARBR is now as dead as a door nail. If I weren't here, the undertakers
might
as well as be called in and put us all under the ground. Anyone but me
notice how dead ARBR has become since NYC is no longer posting here?
[...]

You succeeded in killing it. The job having been accomplished, you can
now take leave of the place.

Did you not notice how ARBR revived when NYC was posting to it? All it takes
is a few live wires and ARBR can be back to where it was. I think however
that we will have to get rid of all the threads having to do with mountain
biking and hiking trails as that is not really germane to this group.

DiIersion duly noted. Be cautious. You are about to alienate the ONLY
ally that you have ... Mikey V., but I have to agree that mountain
biking is not germane to this group. It is most peculiar though for
you recognize that mountain biking is off-topic and yet fail to also
recognize that your nonsense, not even remotely related to cycling, as
accptable rather than not germane. This exceeds literary licenseby any
standards. The conundrum continues.

Yes, and you are wrong as usual. I am not a troll. I say outrageous
things
in order to get some kind of a response, but that is not the same
thing
as
being a troll.

Oh but it is. A troll is someone who invades an established online
forum, and posts inflammatory, rude or offensive messages designed
intentionally to annoy and antagonize the existing members or disrupt
the flow of discussion ... and, that's precisely what you do.

Jim is finally saying something of substance which deserves a serious
reply.

Newsgroups that stay too strictly on-topic are impossibly boring and
tedious. There is only so much that can be said on any topic. All
conversations tend to wander a bit and when they do I am here to jump in
on
it and provide some interest and amusement.

Pure rationalization at its finest.

Rudeness and offensiveness are in the eye of the beholder. All is tit for
tat with me, but I do like to provoke - there can be no doubt about that.
But I assume we are all adults here and can take it. Those who have such
extreme sensitivities that they can't take a bit of contention should not
be
here in the first place.

Opinion stated as fact.

Jim, take a closer look at RBM. That group is composed of mostly nothing
but
idiots. They are all over the map on their topics. It is just chock full
of
mindless chit-chat. Certain members of that group are clubby types who
NEVER
say anything the least bit interesting or amusing. Very many other
newsgroups are exactly like RBM. The Aussie one and the UK one for
example.

Forget the diversion. Other newsgroups are not the focal point of this
discussion and as such are irrelevant.

We can learn a lot by looking at other newsgroups. There is nothing unique
about ARBR. We are subject to all the foibles that other newsgroups are
subject to. The only thing we don't have on ARBR are a lot of teenage punks
with their obscenity laden and testosterone driven chit-chat.

I just hate that kind of mindless chit-chat. It belongs on email, not
newsgroups.

Then why must you engage in chit-chat on ARBR?. This is not
alt.mindless.chit-chat. dominated.by.Ed.Dolan!

I am a side dish here on ARBR. I do not interfere with on topic posts.

Yes at the very best you a subordinate to the main course and as such
have little relevancy. As an admitted side dish, you are a TROLL who
is the purveyor of off-topic bibberish (read mindless chit-chat).

I will always try to broaden my comments so as to make them
interesting to the general reader. You should try to do the same yourself
instead of pursing your various vendettas and stalking behavior. It does
not become you at all. That is what kids do, not 60 year old men of the
world.
[...]

I repeat...i didn't ask for your advice...don't value your advice...
will not heed your adivce.

I NEVER am writing just for you on ARBR. I am writing for a universe of
unknown readers. It is really quite pitiful that you are unable to think in
these broader terms. It is why no one finds your posts interesting.

In responding to my post, you are responding to me no matter what kind
of spin you vainly attempt to put on it. As concerns interest in your
posts vs min, I could care less, however I again invite you take a
poll. Strange how you never avail yourself of such suggestions. Could
it be that you don't wnat to see your unpopularity in expressed in the
raw numbers and precision of mathematics?

Jim McNamara

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
ups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Nope, other newsgroups are just chock full of off-topic drivel. Your
only
complaint is that my drivel is better than your drivel.

And I made this complaint where pray tell? Where is you evidence in
support of this fabfication?

The complaint is there underlying your every sentence. It was like that
with
Ed Gin and Tom Sherman too. You need to find your own topics and not be
sponging off others all the time.

What a pitiful retort. I have never stated explicity or implitiy
(complained) that your drivel is better than my drivel. Unlke you, I
don't even regard what I write as drivel. Prove me wrong and cite a
specific example to corroborate yout unsubstantiated assertion. You
cna't can you.

You are tedious in the extreme Jim. I strongly advise you to get your own
topics and not to be constantly sponging off of others who do not really
have any interest in you. Usenet is a cold cruel world and it is mainly made
up of nothing but *******s. The sooner you know this, the better.
[...]

Did you not notice how ARBR revived when NYC was posting to it? All it
takes
is a few live wires and ARBR can be back to where it was. I think however
that we will have to get rid of all the threads having to do with
mountain
biking and hiking trails as that is not really germane to this group.

DiIersion duly noted. Be cautious. You are about to alienate the ONLY
ally that you have ... Mikey V., but I have to agree that mountain
biking is not germane to this group. It is most peculiar though for
you recognize that mountain biking is off-topic and yet fail to also
recognize that your nonsense, not even remotely related to cycling, as
accptable rather than not germane. This exceeds literary licenseby any
standards. The conundrum continues.

I have already explained in another post what I was trying to do. The
trouble is that ARBR is mostly made up of Fred types who have no imagination
and do not know how to run with a subject. Yes, I am out of my element, but
hope springs eternal in the human breast. I feel sorry for all the Freds in
the world who simply have no idea of how much fun it can be to engage with
others in intellectual discourse. The main fun of any newsgroup is getting
off topic. To stay on topic all the time is deadly. No half way bright
person would ever want to stay on topic for more than 2 minutes.

Vandeman is no doubt happy on his own newsgroups and has no interest in our
groups. He is mostly a one-note Johnny and is unlike me that way. He is
never off of his topic. You would be hard put to say what my topic is other
than tweaking everybody.
[...]

I am a side dish here on ARBR. I do not interfere with on topic posts.

Yes at the very best you a subordinate to the main course and as such
have little relevancy. As an admitted side dish, you are a TROLL who
is the purveyor of off-topic bibberish (read mindless chit-chat).

Think of me as an entertainer and you will have it exactly right. But an
entertainer that can jab you to the quick of your soul!
[...]

I NEVER am writing just for you on ARBR. I am writing for a universe of
unknown readers. It is really quite pitiful that you are unable to think
in
these broader terms. It is why no one finds your posts interesting.

In responding to my post, you are responding to me no matter what kind
of spin you vainly attempt to put on it. As concerns interest in your
posts vs min, I could care less, however I again invite you take a
poll. Strange how you never avail yourself of such suggestions. Could
it be that you don't wnat to see your unpopularity in expressed in the
raw numbers and precision of mathematics?

I gage my popularity by the quantity and the quality of the posts that I get
in response. You should do the same. It seems the only time you are able to
engage anyone is when you are one on one with a single adversary, i.e., a
vendetta. I do not like to be limited to that.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
ups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Nope, other newsgroups are just chock full of off-topic drivel. Your
only
complaint is that my drivel is better than your drivel.

And I made this complaint where pray tell? Where is you evidence in
support of this fabfication?

The complaint is there underlying your every sentence. It was like that
with
Ed Gin and Tom Sherman too. You need to find your own topics and not be
sponging off others all the time.

What a pitiful retort. I have never stated explicity or implitiy
(complained) that your drivel is better than my drivel. Unlke you, I
don't even regard what I write as drivel. Prove me wrong and cite a
specific example to corroborate yout unsubstantiated assertion. You
cna't can you.

You are tedious in the extreme Jim. I strongly advise you to get your own
topics and not to be constantly sponging off of others who do not really
have any interest in you. Usenet is a cold cruel world and it is mainly made
up of nothing but *******s. The sooner you know this, the better.

You are monotonouns and pig headed in the extreme. My advsie to you is
to can your worthless advice.

[...]

Did you not notice how ARBR revived when NYC was posting to it? All it
takes
is a few live wires and ARBR can be back to where it was. I think however
that we will have to get rid of all the threads having to do with
mountain
biking and hiking trails as that is not really germane to this group.

Diversion duly noted. Be cautious. You are about to alienate the ONLY
ally that you have ... Mikey V., but I have to agree that mountain
biking is not germane to this group. It is most peculiar though for
you recognize that mountain biking is off-topic and yet fail to also
recognize that your nonsense, not even remotely related to cycling, as
accptable rather than not germane. This exceeds literary licenseby any
standards. The conundrum continues.

I have already explained in another post what I was trying to do. The
trouble is that ARBR is mostly made up of Fred types who have no imagination
and do not know how to run with a subject. Yes, I am out of my element, but
hope springs eternal in the human breast. I feel sorry for all the Freds in
the world who simply have no idea of how much fun it can be to engage with
others in intellectual discourse. The main fun of any newsgroup is getting
off topic. To stay on topic all the time is deadly. No half way bright
person would ever want to stay on topic for more than 2 minutes.

Vandeman is no doubt happy on his own newsgroups and has no interest in our
groups. He is mostly a one-note Johnny and is unlike me that way. He is
never off of his topic. You would be hard put to say what my topic is other
than tweaking everybody.

Off-topic is self-defining and is a practice frowned upon as improper
netiquette, so don't try to rationalize away you indisgressions. Look,
why don't you just start your own newsgroup, like
Dolan.off-topic.whatever. Confine yourself to your new newgroop and
crosspost invitations to whatever newsgroups you want and you will see
just how unpopular you are and how lonely your new newsgroup will be.
I dare you. I double dare you to face up to the truth ... coward..

[...]

I am a side dish here on ARBR. I do not interfere with on topic posts.

Yes at the very best you a subordinate to the main course and as such
have little relevancy. As an admitted side dish, you are a TROLL who
is the purveyor of off-topic bibberish (read mindless chit-chat).

Think of me as an entertainer and you will have it exactly right. But an
entertainer that can jab you to the quick of your soul!
[...]

I think you are begging for a re-posting of my voluminous post that
portrays you for what an who you are and the word entertainer cannot be
found therein. The Readers DIgest condensed version ... you are an
obnoxius fool in serious need of a therapist and an attitude
adjustment.

I NEVER am writing just for you on ARBR. I am writing for a universe of
unknown readers. It is really quite pitiful that you are unable to think
in
these broader terms. It is why no one finds your posts interesting.

In responding to my post, you are responding to me no matter what kind
of spin you vainly attempt to put on it. As concerns interest in your
posts vs min, I could care less, however I again invite you take a
poll. Strange how you never avail yourself of such suggestions. Could
it be that you don't wnat to see your unpopularity in expressed in the
raw numbers and precision of mathematics?

I gage my popularity by the quantity and the quality of the posts that I get
in response. You should do the same. It seems the only time you are able to
engage anyone is when you are one on one with a single adversary, i.e., a
vendetta. I do not like to be limited to that.

Here's a thought. I'm not a troll. I don't bait people into responses
and then deceive myself into believing that when someone responds to
troll bait that this gives meaning to my life and validates my
self-worth. Get a life ... you twisted freak..

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Off-topic is self-defining and is a practice frowned upon as improper
netiquette, so don't try to rationalize away you indisgressions. Look,
why don't you just start your own newsgroup, like
Dolan.off-topic.whatever. Confine yourself to your new newgroop and
crosspost invitations to whatever newsgroups you want and you will see
just how unpopular you are and how lonely your new newsgroup will be.
I dare you. I double dare you to face up to the truth ... coward..

Nope, go to any newsgroup and you will see dozens of threads that are
off-topic. I have explained to you many times why this is so, but you are
too dense to follow my reasoning.
[...]

I think you are begging for a re-posting of my voluminous post that
portrays you for what an who you are and the word entertainer cannot be
found therein. The Readers DIgest condensed version ... you are an
obnoxius fool in serious need of a therapist and an attitude
adjustment.

The longer you hang on my coattails the more pathetic you become. You are
reduced to nothing but a stalker. You have become pitiful and deserving of
the disgust of the entire newsgroup. Try to get a life of your own. My life
is already full and I do not have any room for outsiders.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Off-topic is self-defining and is a practice frowned upon as improper
netiquette, so don't try to rationalize away you indisgressions. Look,
why don't you just start your own newsgroup, like
Dolan.off-topic.whatever. Confine yourself to your new newsgroup and
crosspost invitations to whatever newsgroups you want and you will see
just how unpopular you are and how lonely your new newsgroup will be.
I dare you. I double dare you to face up to the truth ... coward..

Nope, go to any newsgroup and you will see dozens of threads that are
off-topic. I have explained to you many times why this is so, but you are
too dense to follow my reasoning.
[...]

So then you are following the bad example of others then??? Refusal to
accept the challenge duly noted ... coward!!!

I think you are begging for a re-posting of my voluminous post that
portrays you for what an who you are and the word entertainer cannot be
found therein. The Readers DIgest condensed version ... you are an
obnoxius fool in serious need of a therapist and an attitude
adjustment.

The longer you hang on my coattails the more pathetic you become. You are
reduced to nothing but a stalker. You have become pitiful and deserving of
the disgust of the entire newsgroup. Try to get a life of your own. My life
is already full and I do not have any room for outsiders.
[...]

It would appear that there are a number of people chewing at your
coattails. When you don't like the attention that you've earned, you
label your adversaires as stalkers. Look jerk, you asked for it ...
you desrve it ... and, you will not be deprived of it for as long as
you remain. Your only out is to GET OUT. - Jim McNamara

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Off-topic is self-defining and is a practice frowned upon as improper
netiquette, so don't try to rationalize away you indisgressions. Look,
why don't you just start your own newsgroup, like
Dolan.off-topic.whatever. Confine yourself to your new newsgroup and
crosspost invitations to whatever newsgroups you want and you will see
just how unpopular you are and how lonely your new newsgroup will be.
I dare you. I double dare you to face up to the truth ... coward..

Nope, go to any newsgroup and you will see dozens of threads that are
off-topic. I have explained to you many times why this is so, but you are
too dense to follow my reasoning.
[...]

So then you are following the bad example of others then??? Refusal to
accept the challenge duly noted ... coward!!!

I think you are begging for a re-posting of my voluminous post that
portrays you for what an who you are and the word entertainer cannot be
found therein. The Readers DIgest condensed version ... you are an
obnoxius fool in serious need of a therapist and an attitude
adjustment.

The longer you hang on my coattails the more pathetic you become. You are
reduced to nothing but a stalker. You have become pitiful and deserving
of
the disgust of the entire newsgroup. Try to get a life of your own. My
life
is already full and I do not have any room for outsiders.
[...]

It would appear that there are a number of people chewing at your
coattails. When you don't like the attention that you've earned, you
label your adversaires as stalkers. Look jerk, you asked for it ...
you desrve it ... and, you will not be deprived of it for as long as
you remain. Your only out is to GET OUT. - Jim McNamara

Jim has become nothing but a pitiful, pathetic stalker. He is incapable of
posting anything on his own that anyone in this world would want to read,
let alone respond to. Nay, he is only capable of childish feuds with the
likes of Ed Gin, Tom Sherman and now the Great Ed Dolan. He is a man of the
shadows, never daring the sunlight of standing on his own.

Unfortunately for him Ed Dolan the Great is, well, just too Great to expend
any time on him. I will shortly dispense of him the way Tom Sherman did, by
showing nothing but exasperation. It is easy to do this and does not take
any effort at all. I will write one word to his hundreds of words and have
the infinite satisfaction of knowing that no one, but no one, will ever
bother to read any of this ****.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Off-topic is self-defining and is a practice frowned upon as improper
netiquette, so don't try to rationalize away you indisgressions. Look,
why don't you just start your own newsgroup, like
Dolan.off-topic.whatever. Confine yourself to your new newsgroup and
crosspost invitations to whatever newsgroups you want and you will see
just how unpopular you are and how lonely your new newsgroup will be.
I dare you. I double dare you to face up to the truth ... coward..

Nope, go to any newsgroup and you will see dozens of threads that are
off-topic. I have explained to you many times why this is so, but you are
too dense to follow my reasoning.
[...]

So then you are following the bad example of others then??? Refusal to
accept the challenge duly noted ... coward!!!

I think you are begging for a re-posting of my voluminous post that
portrays you for what an who you are and the word entertainer cannot be
found therein. The Readers DIgest condensed version ... you are an
obnoxius fool in serious need of a therapist and an attitude
adjustment.

The longer you hang on my coattails the more pathetic you become. You are
reduced to nothing but a stalker. You have become pitiful and deserving
of
the disgust of the entire newsgroup. Try to get a life of your own. My
life
is already full and I do not have any room for outsiders.
[...]

It would appear that there are a number of people chewing at your
coattails. When you don't like the attention that you've earned, you
label your adversaires as stalkers. Look jerk, you asked for it ...
you desrve it ... and, you will not be deprived of it for as long as
you remain. Your only out is to GET OUT. - Jim McNamara

Jim has become nothing but a pitiful, pathetic stalker. He is incapable of
posting anything on his own that anyone in this world would want to read,
let alone respond to. Nay, he is only capable of childish feuds with the
likes of Ed Gin, Tom Sherman and now the Great Ed Dolan. He is a man of the
shadows, never daring the sunlight of standing on his own.

Anytime you feel the heat, you start whining about one of you
adversaries being a stalker. Since several readers have recently made
favorable comments regarding posts I've made about you, it would appear
that your statement regarding others not reading what I've written is
quite incorrect. I've responded to this feud charge of yours several
times before. You have had feuds with all of the names mentioned but
one since you cannot be expected to have a feud with yourself. In
addition, you have had feuds with countless others with whom I have
not. You are just far less selective. He who lives in a glass house
shouldn't throw stones, Ed. A man of shadows, naver daring the
sunlight says the self-proclaimed hermit. I'd love to meet you in the
sunlight sometime. I'm sure others would too. You wouldn't have the
testicular fortitude to say half the things you say to others up close
an personal like. If you did, you'd surely get what's coming to you.

Unfortunately for him Ed Dolan the Great is, well, just too Great to expend
any time on him.

Tool late. You just did.

I will shortly dispense of him the way Tom Sherman did, by
showing nothing but exasperation.

As you will recall, Tom gave it up.

It is easy to do this and does not take
any effort at all. I will write one word to his hundreds of words and have
the infinite satisfaction of knowing that no one, but no one, will ever
bother to read any of this ****.

A clever tacticain never provides the details of his strategy to his
adversary. You're not too bright are you???

Jim McNamara

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...

Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Off-topic is self-defining and is a practice frowned upon as improper
netiquette, so don't try to rationalize away you indisgressions. Look,
why don't you just start your own newsgroup, like
Dolan.off-topic.whatever. Confine yourself to your new newsgroup and
crosspost invitations to whatever newsgroups you want and you will see
just how unpopular you are and how lonely your new newsgroup will be.
I dare you. I double dare you to face up to the truth ... coward..

Nope, go to any newsgroup and you will see dozens of threads that are
off-topic. I have explained to you many times why this is so, but you are
too dense to follow my reasoning.
[...]

So then you are following the bad example of others then??? Refusal to
accept the challenge duly noted ... coward!!!

I think you are begging for a re-posting of my voluminous post that
portrays you for what an who you are and the word entertainer cannot be
found therein. The Readers DIgest condensed version ... you are an
obnoxius fool in serious need of a therapist and an attitude
adjustment.

The longer you hang on my coattails the more pathetic you become. You are
reduced to nothing but a stalker. You have become pitiful and deserving
of
the disgust of the entire newsgroup. Try to get a life of your own. My
life
is already full and I do not have any room for outsiders.
[...]

It would appear that there are a number of people chewing at your
coattails. When you don't like the attention that you've earned, you
label your adversaires as stalkers. Look jerk, you asked for it ...
you desrve it ... and, you will not be deprived of it for as long as
you remain. Your only out is to GET OUT. - Jim McNamara

Jim has become nothing but a pitiful, pathetic stalker. He is incapable of
posting anything on his own that anyone in this world would want to read,
let alone respond to. Nay, he is only capable of childish feuds with the
likes of Ed Gin, Tom Sherman and now the Great Ed Dolan. He is a man of the
shadows, never daring the sunlight of standing on his own.

Anytime you feel the heat, you start whining about one of you
adversaries being a stalker. Since several readers have recently made
favorable comments regarding posts I've made about you, it would appear
that your statement regarding others not reading what I've written is
quite incorrect. I've responded to this feud charge of yours several
times before. You have had feuds with all of the names mentioned but
one since you cannot be expected to have a feud with yourself. In
addition, you have had feuds with countless others with whom I have
not. You are just far less selective. He who lives in a glass house
shouldn't throw stones, Ed. A man of shadows, naver daring the
sunlight says the self-proclaimed hermit. I'd love to meet you in the
sunlight sometime. I'm sure others would too. You wouldn't have the
testicular fortitude to say half the things you say to others up close
an personal like. If you did, you'd surely get what's coming to you.

Unfortunately for him Ed Dolan the Great is, well, just too Great to expend
any time on him.

Tool late. You just did.

I will shortly dispense of him the way Tom Sherman did, by
showing nothing but exasperation.

As you will recall, Tom gave it up.

It is easy to do this and does not take
any effort at all. I will write one word to his hundreds of words and have
the infinite satisfaction of knowing that no one, but no one, will ever
bother to read any of this ****.

A clever tacticain never provides the details of his strategy to his
adversary. You're not too bright are you???

Jim McNamara

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...
Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Jim has become nothing but a pitiful, pathetic stalker. He is incapable
of
posting anything on his own that anyone in this world would want to read,
let alone respond to. Nay, he is only capable of childish feuds with the
likes of Ed Gin, Tom Sherman and now the Great Ed Dolan. He is a man of
the
shadows, never daring the sunlight of standing on his own.
[...]
Unfortunately for him Ed Dolan the Great is, well, just too Great to
expend
any time on him.

Tool late. You just did.

All of your posts from here on out will be severely edited (same goes for
Curtiss, another pitiful stalker and leech) unless you are able to dredge up
material that I think the group might be interested in reading.

I will shortly dispense of him the way Tom Sherman did, by
showing nothing but exasperation.

As you will recall, Tom gave it up.

Tom never gave up, he simply left you in disgust. That is the only way to
deal with stalkers and leeches as they are just so pitiful. Christ, you
almost end up feeling sorry for the poor *******s.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message
oups.com...
Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
Jim has become nothing but a pitiful, pathetic stalker. He is incapable
of
posting anything on his own that anyone in this world would want to read,
let alone respond to. Nay, he is only capable of childish feuds with the
likes of Ed Gin, Tom Sherman and now the Great Ed Dolan. He is a man of
the
shadows, never daring the sunlight of standing on his own.
[...]
Unfortunately for him Ed Dolan the Great is, well, just too Great to
expend
any time on him.

Tool late. You just did.

All of your posts from here on out will be severely edited

You hearbreaker.

(same goes for
Curtiss, another pitiful stalker and leech) unless you are able to dredge up
material that I think the group might be interested in reading.

That you think the group might be interested in reading. Are you ever
arrogant. Where do you get off making such determinations for
others?? You play your silly little games and do what you feel you
must. I couldn't care less.

I will shortly dispense of him the way Tom Sherman did, by
showing nothing but exasperation.

As you will recall, Tom gave it up.

Tom never gave up, he simply left you in disgust.

Same differnece.

That is the only way to
deal with stalkers and leeches as they are just so pitiful. Christ, you
almost end up feeling sorry for the poor *******s.

That's strange. Then, why don't I feel like that about you. - Jim
McNamara

[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota