Fake Youtube videos

On Monday, 25 May 2020 21:27:19 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 18:38, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 18:22:11 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 18:07, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 18:00:31 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 17:34, Paul George wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 17:00:11 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 15:43, Paul George wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 14:59:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 14:34, Paul George wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 10:15:17 UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 09:58 25 May 2020, Paul George said:

On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never had a
car approach me driving along a footway. I can't say that about
cycles - sometimes a whole family, who can never see anything wrong
with their behaviour.


When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking up Lord
Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove at me on the
footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted murder was he was just
trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched claim
about "attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my life,
because my family (both sides) have residential and other roots in the
area dating from before WW2 right up until the 1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress since
it feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways with limited
turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the fabrication of his story.

When did you last visit Lord Nelson St?

You can now visit Lord Nelson Street anytime on Google streetview. When did
you last visit?

February. I would have used it to get to work on Friday and would be using it for the same reason tomorrow if we weren't under lockdown. The top end of Lord Nelson St was significantly modified about 20 years ago when Seymour St was changed from dual to single carriageway. Lord Nelson St used to end at St Vincent St but has now been extended. I am guessing this happened after Nugent's aunt moved out. The new footway section beyond the Liner car park is plenty wide enough for a car.

Seymour Street a dual carriageway?

How wide would you say it is between kerbs?

I don't know what is was called before but in the past when you walked from School of Trop Med down Pembroke Place to Lime St Station at the junction where Pem Pl turned into London Road there was a pub on the left and traffic split around it. That was all changed 20+ years ago and Lord Nelson St was part of the change.

Yes, the legendary Swan (now gone of course), at the junction of London
Road and Norton Street with Seymour Street and St Vincent Street (then
part of a one-way system, never a dual carriageway).

Do you now accept Lord Nelson St has changed since your aunt lived there?

The change lies in extending the eastern end of the street from its
former terminus at the now-vandalised St Vincent Street to a new
terminus a few yards further on at Seymour Street. The rest of the
street (all of it, as it once was) is the same as it always was in width
terms, plus the extinction of the former turning into or out of Pudsey
Street.

Lime Street Station taxi rank has been moved to the other side of the station to Skelhorne St and the Post Office on Copperas Hill has been torn down and redeveloped by JMU (aka Liverpool Poly).

The taxi rank has been on the south side (inside the station canopy and
also fed from Bolton Street) for several decades. The station is now fed
by a taxi-rank directly on Skelhorne Street (made possible by a change
in the one way direction of that street).

Despite what you say about it having been "moved", there is also (still)
a newer taxi-rank in Lord Nelson Street on the north side, between the
station and the Empire Theatre, as already mentioned by at least two
posters.

Check it out on Streetview - it's all there.

Maybe Mike Collins was telling the truth after all, especially about traffic on Great Newton St.

Great Newton Street is some distance from the location under discussion
(more than two-tenths of a mile by the shortest walking route and even
more by vehicle). Great Newton Street and Lord Nelson Street do not meet
or feed each other and never have.

So you agree Lord Nelson St can get busy with taxi's after the London train arrives

No.

Taxis do not make for Lime Street Station when "the London train
arrives". There are other trains, and Lime Street Staion is
well-supplied with taxis all day and evening.

Actually they do, or did back then. London is the only long distance service from Lime St.

So Glasgow, Hull, Bristol, etc, are all local trains, are they?


Obviously it is possible to get to many destinations from Lime St but only London is directly accessible on an InterCity train. To get to Glasgow you have to use a local train East to the WCML at Wigan, Warrington or Preston.
And in anticipation of your response I am not a Train spotter any more than you are a Road spotter.

On 26/05/2020 00:22, Paul George wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 21:27:19 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 18:38, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 18:22:11 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 18:07, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 18:00:31 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 17:34, Paul George wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 17:00:11 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 15:43, Paul George wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 14:59:08 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 14:34, Paul George wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 10:15:17 UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
On 09:58 25 May 2020, Paul George said:

On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 17:05:09 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 20/05/2020 11:21, Pamela wrote:
On 20:18 19 May 2020, Mike Collins said:

On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 19:44:44 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

True. And I too can say it as a pedestrian. But I have never had a
car approach me driving along a footway. I can't say that about
cycles - sometimes a whole family, who can never see anything wrong
with their behaviour.


When I had the misfortune to work in Liverpool I was walking up Lord
Nelson Street from Lime Street Station and a car drove at me on the
footway. The moronist's excuse for attempted murder was he was just
trying to keep the traffic flowing.

You failed to provide any evidence to support that far-fetched claim
about "attempted murder". A police report would do.

I know Lord Nelson Street *very* well. I have known it all my life,
because my family (both sides) have residential and other roots in the
area dating from before WW2 right up until the 1970s.

There is no appreciable traffic in Lord Nelson Street. It is a
destination, not a route. Traffic using it cannot make progress since
it feeds back into one-way streets and dual-carriageways with limited
turns. MC's not knowing that led him into the fabrication of his story.

When did you last visit Lord Nelson St?

You can now visit Lord Nelson Street anytime on Google streetview. When did
you last visit?

February. I would have used it to get to work on Friday and would be using it for the same reason tomorrow if we weren't under lockdown. The top end of Lord Nelson St was significantly modified about 20 years ago when Seymour St was changed from dual to single carriageway. Lord Nelson St used to end at St Vincent St but has now been extended. I am guessing this happened after Nugent's aunt moved out. The new footway section beyond the Liner car park is plenty wide enough for a car.

Seymour Street a dual carriageway?

How wide would you say it is between kerbs?

I don't know what is was called before but in the past when you walked from School of Trop Med down Pembroke Place to Lime St Station at the junction where Pem Pl turned into London Road there was a pub on the left and traffic split around it. That was all changed 20+ years ago and Lord Nelson St was part of the change.

Yes, the legendary Swan (now gone of course), at the junction of London
Road and Norton Street with Seymour Street and St Vincent Street (then
part of a one-way system, never a dual carriageway).

Do you now accept Lord Nelson St has changed since your aunt lived there?

The change lies in extending the eastern end of the street from its
former terminus at the now-vandalised St Vincent Street to a new
terminus a few yards further on at Seymour Street. The rest of the
street (all of it, as it once was) is the same as it always was in width
terms, plus the extinction of the former turning into or out of Pudsey
Street.

Lime Street Station taxi rank has been moved to the other side of the station to Skelhorne St and the Post Office on Copperas Hill has been torn down and redeveloped by JMU (aka Liverpool Poly).

The taxi rank has been on the south side (inside the station canopy and
also fed from Bolton Street) for several decades. The station is now fed
by a taxi-rank directly on Skelhorne Street (made possible by a change
in the one way direction of that street).

Despite what you say about it having been "moved", there is also (still)
a newer taxi-rank in Lord Nelson Street on the north side, between the
station and the Empire Theatre, as already mentioned by at least two
posters.

Check it out on Streetview - it's all there.

Maybe Mike Collins was telling the truth after all, especially about traffic on Great Newton St.

Great Newton Street is some distance from the location under discussion
(more than two-tenths of a mile by the shortest walking route and even
more by vehicle). Great Newton Street and Lord Nelson Street do not meet
or feed each other and never have.

So you agree Lord Nelson St can get busy with taxi's after the London train arrives

No.

Taxis do not make for Lime Street Station when "the London train
arrives". There are other trains, and Lime Street Staion is
well-supplied with taxis all day and evening.

Actually they do, or did back then. London is the only long distance service from Lime St.

So Glasgow, Hull, Bristol, etc, are all local trains, are they?

Obviously it is possible to get to many destinations from Lime St but only London is directly accessible on an InterCity train.

Not Birmingham, then?

Or Bristol?

How about spit Manchester?

Hull?

To get to Glasgow you have to use a local train East to the WCML at Wigan, Warrington or Preston.

Nonsense.

I have travelled direct to Glasgow from Lime Street (on a railway train)
and back again. You may be thinking of the old separate route to Preston
and the north from Exchange Station.

Have a quick look at
https://www.thetrainline.com/train-times/liverpool-lime-street-to-glasgow-central

If it's gone by the time you click, just search for Lime Street direct
to Glasgow. It'll all be revealed.

After that, try Lime Street to (say) Leeds. And then Birmingham.

And in anticipation of your response I am not a Train spotter

I can see that.

any more than you are a Road spotter.

Anyone who travels by road has to be a road spotter.

On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 01:26:22 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

I have travelled direct to Glasgow from Lime Street (on a railway train)
and back again. You may be thinking of the old separate route to Preston
and the north from Exchange Station.

Have a quick look at
https://www.thetrainline.com/train-times/liverpool-lime-street-to-glasgow-central

If it's gone by the time you click, just search for Lime Street direct
to Glasgow. It'll all be revealed.


£344 return to sit on a local train that can only use the WCML when InterCity trains don't want it and only once a day.
The Apologists for Bad Driving will tell you it is possible to buy a car at auction and drive for less.

On Monday, 25 May 2020 18:01:13 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 17:40, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 17:31:05 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 16:41, Paul George wrote:

I believe Mike Collins.

You are wrong to do so.

Attempted Murder may be a bit of an exaggeration because it was 'Only a motoring offence'.

A rather big "bit of an exaggeration" because it didn't happen.

Can you provide evidence to support this claim?

Apart from the fact that your attempted murder wasn't reported in the
Echo, you mean?

So no evidence to support your claim.

On 00:10 26 May 2020, TMS320 said:
On 25/05/2020 23:47, Pamela wrote:
JNugent wrote:



More Mason rubbish (yet again).

But it's no surprise to see a cyclist asserting that an illegal act is
not illegal.

If you're interested, look up the Criminal Attempts Act 1981; S 1 (1).

Or even easier, just Google for the results of trials for attempted
murder.


Like this one for instance (it wasn't in Lord Nelson Street, Liver
pool, though):

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...empted-murder-
woman-hit-by-car-a4339586.html

Simon is obsessing about spelling. He doesn't so much take issue with
the substance of what I wrote as much as its spelling.

Why can't you address people directly when you insult them?

Hello TMS320, my comment is addressed to JNugent because it is about his
post.

Nugent made the understandable mistake of thinking Simon was commenting on
the substance of my post and Nugent replied about that. Whereas in
reality Simon was obsessing only about my spelling and was not dealing
with my content.

I guess that all went over your head with a big WHOOSH, despite being able
to read my explanation to Nugent.

Thank you for your concern but perhaps next time you play the Netkop you
could make sure you know what is going on.

On 02:53 26 May 2020, Mike Collins said:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 18:01:13 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 17:40, Mike Collins wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2020 17:31:05 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 25/05/2020 16:41, Paul George wrote:

I believe Mike Collins.

You are wrong to do so.

Attempted Murder may be a bit of an exaggeration because it was
'Only a motoring offence'.

A rather big "bit of an exaggeration" because it didn't happen.

Can you provide evidence to support this claim?

Apart from the fact that your attempted murder wasn't reported in the
Echo, you mean?

So no evidence to support your claim.

Michael, please post the police report to back up your claim of "attempted
murder".

On 26/05/2020 08:01, Pamela wrote:
On 00:10 26 May 2020, TMS320 said:

Why can't you address people directly when you insult them?

Hello TMS320, my comment is addressed to JNugent because it is about his
post.

I know. I couldn't have replied if it wasn't otherwise.

unnecessary words snipped

On 26/05/2020 02:33, Paul George wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 01:26:22 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

I have travelled direct to Glasgow from Lime Street (on a railway train)
and back again. You may be thinking of the old separate route to Preston
and the north from Exchange Station.

Have a quick look at
https://www.thetrainline.com/train-times/liverpool-lime-street-to-glasgow-central

If it's gone by the time you click, just search for Lime Street direct
to Glasgow. It'll all be revealed.


£344 return to sit on a local train that can only use the WCML when InterCity trains don't want it and only once a day.
The Apologists for Bad Driving will tell you it is possible to buy a car at auction and drive for less.

The "local" train to which you refer gets from Liverpool Lime Street to
Glasgow Central, direct, in about three and a half hours.

It is, I suppose, possible to pay £344 return, but the site I cited
advertises one-way fares for as little as £11. But I agree with your
central implied thesis that railways are a great consumer of resources
and can be expensive as a result.

Now... what *are* you actually arguing about?

Are you still trying to support the nonsensical (and fabricated)
contention that taxis only go to the Lime Street Station rank(s) when
"the London train" is due?

Or are you still trying to claim that Intercity trains only travel
between London and various provincial termini?

Or what, exactly?

On 26/05/2020 08:01, Pamela wrote:
On 00:10 26 May 2020, TMS320 said:
On 25/05/2020 23:47, Pamela wrote:
JNugent wrote:



More Mason rubbish (yet again).

But it's no surprise to see a cyclist asserting that an illegal act is
not illegal.

If you're interested, look up the Criminal Attempts Act 1981; S 1 (1).

Or even easier, just Google for the results of trials for attempted
murder.


Like this one for instance (it wasn't in Lord Nelson Street, Liver
pool, though):

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...empted-murder-
woman-hit-by-car-a4339586.html

Simon is obsessing about spelling. He doesn't so much take issue with
the substance of what I wrote as much as its spelling.

Why can't you address people directly when you insult them?

Hello TMS320, my comment is addressed to JNugent because it is about his
post.

Nugent made the understandable mistake of thinking Simon was commenting on
the substance of my post and Nugent replied about that. Whereas in
reality Simon was obsessing only about my spelling and was not dealing
with my content.

I guess that all went over your head with a big WHOOSH, despite being able
to read my explanation to Nugent.

Thank you for your concern but perhaps next time you play the Netkop you
could make sure you know what is going on.

Although it has been snipped from the above, this was in response to
Simon's assertion that attempted murder isn't a crime. Or more strictly,
that there is no such crime as attempted murder.

On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 8:01:33 AM UTC+1, Pamela wrote:
Whereas in
reality Simon was obsessing only about my spelling and was not dealing
with my content.

You wrote about "Attmpted (SIC) murder". A good lawyer could get you off such a charge on a technicality since it is spelled incorrectly.