|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Crank square taper...?
Howdy, I know (barely) that the familiar square taper for mounting cranks on BBs has been supplanted by something else. Might you point me to a link that would show me the "something else?" Sincere thanks, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:59:05 -0400, Kenneth
wrote: Howdy, I know (barely) that the familiar square taper for mounting cranks on BBs has been supplanted by something else. Might you point me to a link that would show me the "something else?" Not "supplanted", at least not yet; the square taper remains the design most often used for low-end, midrange and even some high-end bikes. There are some competing types, though. The ISIS splined design is popular with some users and manufacturers; it looks like this: http://tinyurl.com/4pn5j The similar Shimano Octalink design has been reported to have problems with cranks loosening in service, and seems to be falling out of favor to some extent, though it's still widely available: http://tinyurl.com/5qegf http://tinyurl.com/6bm9s Shimano has come out with a radically different (and very proprietary) design for their high-end Dura Ace line. It features a right crank and bottom bracket shaft that is integrated together into one unit, making installation somewhat different. Eventually, there probably will be a design that supplants the venerable square taper, but despite its shortcomings, for the moment it is still the type used on the majority of bikes sold. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:43:59 GMT, Werehatrack
wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:59:05 -0400, Kenneth wrote: Howdy, I know (barely) that the familiar square taper for mounting cranks on BBs has been supplanted by something else. Might you point me to a link that would show me the "something else?" Not "supplanted", at least not yet; the square taper remains the design most often used for low-end, midrange and even some high-end bikes. There are some competing types, though. The ISIS splined design is popular with some users and manufacturers; it looks like this: http://tinyurl.com/4pn5j The similar Shimano Octalink design has been reported to have problems with cranks loosening in service, and seems to be falling out of favor to some extent, though it's still widely available: http://tinyurl.com/5qegf http://tinyurl.com/6bm9s Shimano has come out with a radically different (and very proprietary) design for their high-end Dura Ace line. It features a right crank and bottom bracket shaft that is integrated together into one unit, making installation somewhat different. Eventually, there probably will be a design that supplants the venerable square taper, but despite its shortcomings, for the moment it is still the type used on the majority of bikes sold. Howdy, I sincerely appreciate your help...! All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Kenneth- I know (barely) that the familiar square taper for mounting cranks
on BBs has been supplanted by something else. Might you point me to a link that would show me the "something else?" BRBR There are different designs, specifically spline type BBs from shimano(Octalink) and others(ISIS) but square taper hasn't been 'supplanted'. Square taper is alive and well on many cranks from many manufacturers. There is no advantage of splined over a properly installed square taper. Some disadvantages, most importantly teeny bearings that don't last very long(ISIS). Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
rault- Shimano has come out with a radically different (and very proprietary)
design for their high-end Dura Ace line. It features a right crank and bottom bracket shaft that is integrated together into one unit, making installation somewhat different. BRBR Actually not propriatary at all. FSA and others have designed this 'ala a headset' type of external bearings. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Werehatrack wrote:
Not "supplanted", at least not yet; the square taper remains the design most often used for low-end, midrange and even some high-end bikes. pedant But it's an octagonal taper really; have a close look. A real square taper would crack the crank ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:10:43 +0100, Zog The Undeniable
wrote: Werehatrack wrote: Not "supplanted", at least not yet; the square taper remains the design most often used for low-end, midrange and even some high-end bikes. pedant But it's an octagonal taper really; have a close look. A real square taper would crack the crank ;-) Howdy, Are the other (very small) faces mating surfaces? If not, then it would certainly seem appropriate to call it a square taper... All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:35:25 -0400, Alex Rodriguez
wrote: In article , says... Shimano has come out with a radically different (and very proprietary) design for their high-end Dura Ace line. It features a right crank and bottom bracket shaft that is integrated together into one unit, making installation somewhat different. pinch bolt onto a spline end is proprietary? it's been done before. I think bullseye was (is?), doing that for some time. Their precise choice of a spline size and shaping is certain to have been made the subject of a design patent to prevent others from supplying a compatible product. Not that it matters, since the DA crank design is probably going to remain pricey enough to guarantee that the square taper will have a long life ahead of it unless something better comes along that's not restricted. The key is that the square taper works *well enough* for the majority of riders that there's not sufficient interest in coming up with an inexpensive improved replacement. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
New bicycle idea | Bob Marley | General | 49 | October 7th 04 05:20 AM |
Crank square taper hole too large - options? | Phil Holman | Techniques | 12 | July 18th 03 02:10 AM |