Time to Ban the Car...

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:01:10 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:45:17 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:35:49 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:15:02 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

snip


I would like to think that it was a softer approach which drove Plankwit away.


I think that there was some nasty ******* here who searched social media before
posting personal details of Dave online: including photographs of his family -
where he lived etc.

I think that "nasty *******" you refer to was one of Plankwit's own family, a daughter, perhaps. I merely posted a pointer to the page which contained the already posted offending photos.

Which makes you just as bad. I hope someone does the same to you someday.

Pointers to photos of me had been posted previously and regularly, especially by Plankwit. He even spent some time researching crime statistics in my local area.

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:35:49 +0000, Judith wrote:

Tom Crispin is a cyclist and clearly mentally ill.

An alternative scheme proposed that jawed vertebrates are more closely
related to lampreys than to Judith (i.e., that vertebrates include
lampreys but exclude Judith).

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:37:47 +0000, Judith wrote:

Tom Crispin is a cyclist and clearly mentally ill.

Judith averages about 0.5 m (19.7 in) in length. The largest known
species is Eptatretus goliath with a specimen recorded at 127 cm (4 ft 2
in), while Myxine kuoi and Myxine pequenoi seem to reach no more than 18
cm (7.1 in) (some have been seen as small as 4 cm (1.6 in)).

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:26:35 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:01:10 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:45:17 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:35:49 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:15:02 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

snip


I would like to think that it was a softer approach which drove Plankwit away.


I think that there was some nasty ******* here who searched social media before
posting personal details of Dave online: including photographs of his family -
where he lived etc.

I think that "nasty *******" you refer to was one of Plankwit's own family, a daughter, perhaps. I merely posted a pointer to the page which contained the already posted offending photos.

Which makes you just as bad. I hope someone does the same to you someday.

Pointers to photos of me had been posted previously and regularly, especially by Plankwit. He even spent some time researching crime statistics in my local area.

Did the photo have your name and address on it?

--
Why was the "pap smear" called that?
If it'd been called the "**** Scrape," no one would ever have it done.

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:19:12 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:26:35 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:01:10 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:45:17 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:35:49 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:15:02 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

snip


I would like to think that it was a softer approach which drove Plankwit away.


I think that there was some nasty ******* here who searched social media before
posting personal details of Dave online: including photographs of his family -
where he lived etc.

I think that "nasty *******" you refer to was one of Plankwit's own family, a daughter, perhaps. I merely posted a pointer to the page which contained the already posted offending photos.

Which makes you just as bad. I hope someone does the same to you someday.

Pointers to photos of me had been posted previously and regularly, especially by Plankwit. He even spent some time researching crime statistics in my local area.

Did the photo have your name and address on it?

Name and place of work.

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 04:14:59 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:19:12 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:26:35 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:01:10 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:45:17 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:35:49 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:15:02 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

snip


I would like to think that it was a softer approach which drove Plankwit away.


I think that there was some nasty ******* here who searched social media before
posting personal details of Dave online: including photographs of his family -
where he lived etc.

I think that "nasty *******" you refer to was one of Plankwit's own family, a daughter, perhaps. I merely posted a pointer to the page which contained the already posted offending photos.

Which makes you just as bad. I hope someone does the same to you someday.

Pointers to photos of me had been posted previously and regularly, especially by Plankwit. He even spent some time researching crime statistics in my local area.

Did the photo have your name and address on it?

Name and place of work.

Could you provide a message reference please: I can't recall that.

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:14:59 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:19:12 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:26:35 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:01:10 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:45:17 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:35:49 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:15:02 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

snip


I would like to think that it was a softer approach which drove Plankwit away.


I think that there was some nasty ******* here who searched social media before
posting personal details of Dave online: including photographs of his family -
where he lived etc.

I think that "nasty *******" you refer to was one of Plankwit's own family, a daughter, perhaps. I merely posted a pointer to the page which contained the already posted offending photos.

Which makes you just as bad. I hope someone does the same to you someday.

Pointers to photos of me had been posted previously and regularly, especially by Plankwit. He even spent some time researching crime statistics in my local area.

Did the photo have your name and address on it?

Name and place of work.

Place of work is not equal to place of residence.

--
Those who get too big for their britches will be exposed in the end.

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:42:16 -0000, Judith wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 04:14:59 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:19:12 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:26:35 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:01:10 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:45:17 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:35:49 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:15:02 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin wrote:

snip


I would like to think that it was a softer approach which drove Plankwit away.


I think that there was some nasty ******* here who searched social media before
posting personal details of Dave online: including photographs of his family -
where he lived etc.

I think that "nasty *******" you refer to was one of Plankwit's own family, a daughter, perhaps. I merely posted a pointer to the page which contained the already posted offending photos.

Which makes you just as bad. I hope someone does the same to you someday.

Pointers to photos of me had been posted previously and regularly, especially by Plankwit. He even spent some time researching crime statistics in my local area.

Did the photo have your name and address on it?

Name and place of work.

Could you provide a message reference please: I can't recall that.

It only exists in his mind. It is impossible to provide a message reference for that location.

--
Runtime Error 6D at 417A:32CF: Incompetent User.

On 11/01/2016 14:48, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:14:59 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:19:12 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:26:35 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:01:10 AM UTC, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:45:17 -0000, Tom Crispin
wrote:

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:35:49 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:15:02 -0800 (PST), Tom Crispin
wrote:

snip


I would like to think that it was a softer approach which
drove Plankwit away.


I think that there was some nasty ******* here who searched
social media before
posting personal details of Dave online: including photographs
of his family -
where he lived etc.

I think that "nasty *******" you refer to was one of Plankwit's
own family, a daughter, perhaps. I merely posted a pointer to the
page which contained the already posted offending photos.

Which makes you just as bad. I hope someone does the same to you
someday.

Pointers to photos of me had been posted previously and regularly,
especially by Plankwit. He even spent some time researching crime
statistics in my local area.

Did the photo have your name and address on it?

Name and place of work.

Place of work is not equal to place of residence.



Hello and thank you for taking the time to read this announcement.

My name is Peter and I am from Scotland. I am 28 years old and
I have bad teeth and a runny nose.

I am looking for anything with a pulse to shag.
I am a serious, guy.

If you are interested in meeting me, please write to me at the
address below, enclosing a photo, some soiled panties, and
information on how you can be contacted.

Peter Hucker
38 St. Serfs Grove
CLACKMANNAN
FK10 4SR
Tel: 01259 723661

079741 562364

http://uk.local.shropshire.narkive.c...y-for-marriage

On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:42:16 PM UTC, Judith wrote:

Name and place of work.

Could you provide a message reference please: I can't recall that.

How about your .sig here?
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...k/uIhB2A1Zp6MJ

The page Plankwit directed readers to is he
http://lcc.org.uk/articles/lewisham-...young-cyclists

Plankwit claimed I was a Boris Johnson lookalike.