Landis Situation Survey

http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/renders...m0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

On May 15, 9:23 am, wrote:
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/renders...m0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

wrote:
On May 15, 9:23 am, wrote:
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/renders...m0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

The suspense is agonizing.

R

On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour
wrote:

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

The suspense is agonizing.

R

Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell
wrote:
On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour
wrote:

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

The suspense is agonizing.

R

Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

On May 15, 2:54 pm, wrote:
On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell
wrote:

On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour
wrote:

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...

The suspense is agonizing.

R

Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.

I took the test. I answered yes to all. What's my score?
--
Marty

wrote:
On May 15, 11:53 am, Curtis L. Russell
wrote:
On 15 May 2007 10:44:31 -0700, RicodJour
wrote:

Getting a few responses already, will post the results when either it
reaches 50 or participation dies off. No later than a few days...
The suspense is agonizing.
R
Positively yawn inducing. Almost enough to make me want to go there
and respond, but that may kill the 'participation dies off' option.

It's at 35 responders already, your agony/ennui will end soon.


Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

On May 15, 2:56 pm, Marty wrote:

I took the test. I answered yes to all. What's my score?

11:1 with at least one trace of synthetic metabolites.

Fred Fredburger wrote:
Your puny quiz is no match for the inexorable force of my ennui!

Only if ennui is the plural for enema.

On May 15, 9:23 am, wrote:
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/renders...m0kazold302089

limited to first 50 responders...

Results are in. Luckily, I took the results last night when it hit 50
- once it goes over 50, the "free" survey suddenly requires you to pay
to see the results.
-----------------
1) Did Floyd Landis dope during the 2006 TdF?
YES: 27
NO: 23

2) Should the results be thrown out due to lab irregularities?
YES: 35
NO: 15

3) Should Dick Pound lose his WADA chair due to his public statements
in this case?
YES: 38
NO: 12

4) Do you believe there is some type of conspiracy by the USADA
against Landis (e.g. the "get Floyd to get Lance" theory)?
YES: 17
NO: 33

5) Do you think a majority of the top 20 GC riders in the 2006 TdF
used some form of dope during the event?
YES: 32
NO: 18
--------------------

Interpretation - while split on the question of FL's doping, most are
in agreement that the results are invalid, Pound is out-of-control,
there's no conspiracy, and that a majority of the GC riders doped.