|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
On Jan 14, 9:20*am, wrote:
But the fact that you are so ill-informed but so willing to say "a pox on all their houses" is a success for the people who are trying to obfuscate the issue. Congratulations to them. You've been had. It dovetails nicely with his "all human are scum" argument, though. ::::: ::::: Getting much riding in? What did Santa -- er I mean I -- bring you for christmas? For my part, I thought you were a bit too naughty and wanted to give you coal, just cuz of the CO2 it makes and knowing global warming will render Earth a nice warm cozy planet for all of us to live on. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
On Jan 14, 4:12*pm, William Asher wrote:
.......... but they won't let you work with the expectation of payment in the future. * That arrangement wouldn't even be contemplated anywhere. * Anywhere? (With A capitAl A.) |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:12*pm, William Asher wrote: .......... but they won't let you work with the expectation of payment in the future. * That arrangement wouldn't even be contemplated anywhere. * Anywhere? (With A capitAl A.) If you find yourself working for a basic research organization that will let you work up front without money from a sponsor in-house or "on the way," find another job as fast as you can because they will soon be out of business. -- Bill Asher |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
On Jan 14, 4:29*pm, William Asher wrote:
SLAVE of THE STATE wrote: On Jan 14, 4:12*pm, William Asher wrote: .......... but they won't let you work with the expectation of payment in the future. * That arrangement wouldn't even be contemplated anywhere. * Anywhere? *(With A capitAl A.) If you find yourself working for a basic research organization that will let you work up front without money from a sponsor in-house or "on the way," find another job as fast as you can because they will soon be out of business. * You must be another one of my pet primates. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
You must be another one of my pet primates. I consider myself a mindless tool of American imperialist agression more than a pet primate. But that might be the programming the UN put in my microchip. It's been so long since I've had a free thought I don't really remember who controls me anymore. -- Bill Asher |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
On Jan 14, 10:52*am, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Bill C" wrote in message ... And when we pull everyone, for all practical purposes, out like we did in SE Asia who's gonna put a damper on the sectarian war we allowed to get started, and enabled? Enabled? Why is it that you don't seem to notice that the implication here is that all of the Iraqis were MUCH better off under Hussein. Dumbass - Not only were they better off - we were better off too. Containment was a much, much cheaper policy to the tune of a trillion dollars (and more and more as it stretches on into the future). It worked for the Soviet Union, it was working for Iraq. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
On Jan 14, 10:54 am, Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
The draft should be reinstituted and there should be no college deferments. If the sons and daughters of Congresspeople/Presidents are getting sent off to war too, perhaps they'll be more circumspect in engaging in various conflicts around the globe. Imperialist tasks would be given over entirely to private for-profit armies like Blackwater, insuring these ventures will be even more costly and counterproductive than they are currently. Robert |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
On Jan 14, 12:23 pm, Bill C wrote:
The administration seriously cooked/cherry-picked the intel and sold it to even the left/center Democrats. The hell they did. Anyone with two braincells to rub together could see the 'intelligence' was fake. Democrats crawfished their way onto the troopship because they thought it would be a cakewalk, lacked any moral fortitude and didn't want to be seen as weak, not because they believed Saddam was a threat. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
OT Is anyone really surprised?
Tom Kunich wrote:
"Mark & Steven Bornfeld" wrote in message news:SBKij.2437$YW6.692@trndny07... Tom, I'm going to restrict my comments not to the substance, but to the tone of your postings to Robert. This is afterall, RBR. Besides being offensive to me, I see no way that your discursive style is likely to convince anyone that you have something to say. IMO if you have a shred of judgment you'll think a bit before you hit send. Steve, I'm sorry that you are insulted by my tone. Personally I'm insulted by the far left attitude of Chung. For that matter I'm insulted by a lot of very highly educated people who are willing to screw the common man because they believe their educations and positions will allow them to avoid the results of following their suggestions. Well, so long as you can justify your tone it's obviously OK. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who's Surprised? | [email protected] | Racing | 39 | October 22nd 07 05:38 PM |
I'm surprised... | MagillaGorilla | Racing | 3 | September 5th 06 03:50 AM |
Surprised it hasnt been said but... | [email protected] | Racing | 0 | February 19th 06 11:07 PM |
Surprised, not surprised | db. | Recumbent Biking | 0 | January 23rd 06 10:48 PM |
Surprised you people aren't talking about this | Lame Acer | Racing | 1 | August 20th 04 06:53 PM |