Cycling, Chess and IP Addresses

On Feb 15, 6:11*pm, Henry wrote:
On Feb 16, 10:44*am, MrVidmar wrote:





Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings by former women's
chess champion Susan Polgar and her supporters on Usenet for having
raised the issue of drugs in professional cycling, noting how many of
Lance Armstrong's former teammates have gone down for drug use, there is
an article in today's NY Times reporting that an arrest warrant has been
issued against Floyd Landis, the dethroned 2006 Tour de France winner.
The arrest is for computer hacking of the French National drug testing
laboratory for the purpose of tampering with data to make it look as
though the lab was sloppy and unreliable. They caught the hackers
because a Trojan infecting the labs computers was placed there from the
IP address of Landis' trainer and major defender Arnie Baker. *Polgar's
husband, Paul Truong, was identified the same way as the author of
thousands of obscene posting to Usenet using the names of other living
chess personalities. Them there IP addresses don't lie.http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/sp...is.html?ref=gl...

Those chess related cases were settled last month with Polgar and
husband agreeing not to contest their removal from the other USCF for
cause and agreeing to never again in their lives to seek or accept any
leadership positions with the USCF(chess).

of course IP addresses can lie.

it was the chinese! framing flandis for ... something ...

On Feb 15, 2:44*pm, MrVidmar wrote:
Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings by former women's
chess champion Susan Polgar and her supporters on Usenet for having
raised the issue of drugs in professional cycling, noting how many of
Lance Armstrong's former teammates have gone down for drug use, there is
an article in today's NY Times reporting that an arrest warrant has been
issued against Floyd Landis, the dethroned 2006 Tour de France winner.
The arrest is for computer hacking of the French National drug testing
laboratory for the purpose of tampering with data to make it look as
though the lab was sloppy and unreliable. They caught the hackers
because a Trojan infecting the labs computers was placed there from the
IP address of Landis' trainer and major defender Arnie Baker. *Polgar's
husband, Paul Truong, was identified the same way as the author of
thousands of obscene posting to Usenet using the names of other living
chess personalities. Them there IP addresses don't lie.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/sp.../16landis.html

Those chess related cases were settled last month with Polgar and
husband agreeing not to contest their removal from the other USCF for
cause and agreeing to never again in their lives to seek or accept any
leadership positions with the USCF(chess).

Dumbass,

From the article:

"Investigators concluded that the program could have
originated from an e-mail message sent to the lab from
a computer using the same Internet protocol address
as Arnie Baker, Landis’s coach."

The Times says "could have originated" while you said
the Trojan "was placed there from the IP address [of Baker]."
As a lawyer, the difference between these two phrasings
should be obvious to you. Does this mean that you're
disseminating false evidence on Usenet?

Ben

KurganGringioni wrote:
"MrVidmar" wrote in message
...


: Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings




Please go away.

Please go **** yourself. Thanks.

wrote:
On Feb 15, 2:44 pm, MrVidmar wrote:
Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings by former women's
chess champion Susan Polgar and her supporters on Usenet for having
raised the issue of drugs in professional cycling, noting how many of
Lance Armstrong's former teammates have gone down for drug use, there is
an article in today's NY Times reporting that an arrest warrant has been
issued against Floyd Landis, the dethroned 2006 Tour de France winner.
The arrest is for computer hacking of the French National drug testing
laboratory for the purpose of tampering with data to make it look as
though the lab was sloppy and unreliable. They caught the hackers
because a Trojan infecting the labs computers was placed there from the
IP address of Landis' trainer and major defender Arnie Baker. Polgar's
husband, Paul Truong, was identified the same way as the author of
thousands of obscene posting to Usenet using the names of other living
chess personalities. Them there IP addresses don't lie.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/sp.../16landis.html

Those chess related cases were settled last month with Polgar and
husband agreeing not to contest their removal from the other USCF for
cause and agreeing to never again in their lives to seek or accept any
leadership positions with the USCF(chess).

Dumbass,

From the article:

"Investigators concluded that the program could have
originated from an e-mail message sent to the lab from
a computer using the same Internet protocol address
as Arnie Baker, Landis’s coach."

The Times says "could have originated" while you said
the Trojan "was placed there from the IP address [of Baker]."
As a lawyer, the difference between these two phrasings
should be obvious to you. Does this mean that you're
disseminating false evidence on Usenet?

Ben
ROTFLMAO!!! You might want to read some of the other news reports, Stupid.

Bob Schwartz wrote:
MrVidmar wrote:
I suspect Mr. Landis and Mr. Baker will be retaining criminal defense
attorneys here in the US. If they introduced false, manufactured
evidence in the arbitration proceeding conducted here in the US, it is
possible that they have run afoul of federal and state criminal statutes.

In the chess cases settled in Texas, we came across communications
during discovery that raised a red flag that a false affidavit may
have been submitted to the court. Courts, including arbitration
panels of the AAA, don't like it when the integrity of the proceeding
is called into question. I would expect the US Anti-doping Agency to
take a hard look at the tampering evidence with an eye to going to the
authorities.

Aren't you the guy that said that the **** would hit the fan
once the Walsh book was published in English?

Aren't you the guy that mistook a gym teacher for a college
perfesser.


OH! Let me play too!

He's also the guy who KNEW Flandis was clean because he didn't "ride
like a robot."

MrVidmar wrote:
KurganGringioni wrote:
"MrVidmar" wrote in message
...


: Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings




Please go away.
Please go **** yourself. Thanks.

Dude,

Have you noticed that no one has welcomed you back?

Bob Schwartz

In article ,
Bob Schwartz wrote:

MrVidmar wrote:
KurganGringioni wrote:
"MrVidmar" wrote in message
...


: Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings




Please go away.
Please go **** yourself. Thanks.

Dude,

Have you noticed that no one has welcomed you back?

Bill Crowther would have. Well, he'd have welcomed "Davey" back too.

--
tanx,
Howard

Caught playing safe
It's a bored game

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

On Feb 15, 7:55*pm, MrVidmar wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 15, 2:44 pm, MrVidmar wrote:
Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings by former women's
chess champion Susan Polgar and her supporters on Usenet for having
raised the issue of drugs in professional cycling, noting how many of
Lance Armstrong's former teammates have gone down for drug use, there is
an article in today's NY Times reporting that an arrest warrant has been
issued against Floyd Landis, the dethroned 2006 Tour de France winner.
The arrest is for computer hacking of the French National drug testing
laboratory for the purpose of tampering with data to make it look as
though the lab was sloppy and unreliable. They caught the hackers
because a Trojan infecting the labs computers was placed there from the
IP address of Landis' trainer and major defender Arnie Baker. *Polgar's
husband, Paul Truong, was identified the same way as the author of
thousands of obscene posting to Usenet using the names of other living
chess personalities. Them there IP addresses don't lie.
*http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/sp.../16landis.html

Those chess related cases were settled last month with Polgar and
husband agreeing not to contest their removal from the other USCF for
cause and agreeing to never again in their lives to seek or accept any
leadership positions with the USCF(chess).

Dumbass,

From the article:

"Investigators concluded that the program could have
originated from an e-mail message sent to the lab from
a computer using the same Internet protocol address
as Arnie Baker, Landis s coach."

The Times says "could have originated" while you said
the Trojan "was placed there from the IP address [of Baker]."
As a lawyer, the difference between these two phrasings
should be obvious to you. *Does this mean that you're
disseminating false evidence on Usenet?

Ben

ROTFLMAO!!! You might want to read some of the other news reports, Stupid..

I can wait for them to be translated from French.

Thanks,
Ben

On Feb 16, 1:38*pm, "
wrote:
On Feb 15, 2:44*pm, MrVidmar wrote:



Have been personally lambasted in court pleadings by former women's
chess champion Susan Polgar and her supporters on Usenet for having
raised the issue of drugs in professional cycling, noting how many of
Lance Armstrong's former teammates have gone down for drug use, there is
an article in today's NY Times reporting that an arrest warrant has been
issued against Floyd Landis, the dethroned 2006 Tour de France winner.
The arrest is for computer hacking of the French National drug testing
laboratory for the purpose of tampering with data to make it look as
though the lab was sloppy and unreliable. They caught the hackers
because a Trojan infecting the labs computers was placed there from the
IP address of Landis' trainer and major defender Arnie Baker. *Polgar's
husband, Paul Truong, was identified the same way as the author of
thousands of obscene posting to Usenet using the names of other living
chess personalities. Them there IP addresses don't lie.
*http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/sp.../16landis.html

Those chess related cases were settled last month with Polgar and
husband agreeing not to contest their removal from the other USCF for
cause and agreeing to never again in their lives to seek or accept any
leadership positions with the USCF(chess).

Dumbass,

From the article:

"Investigators concluded that the program could have
originated from an e-mail message sent to the lab from
a computer using the same Internet protocol address
as Arnie Baker, Landis’s coach."

The Times says "could have originated" while you said
the Trojan "was placed there from the IP address [of Baker]."
As a lawyer, the difference between these two phrasings
should be obvious to you. *Does this mean that you're
disseminating false evidence on Usenet?

Ben

the chain of technical evidence is dodgy. the circumstantial evidence
is much more fun

Fred Fredburger wrote:
OH! Let me play too!

You just want to play cos you heard the chess chicks are hot and Mrs
Fredburgers gone to Vegas or Vancouver.