|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 17:39, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 16:53, Bod wrote: On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why *If* that is what it means in chav-speak, it was a particularly mystifying response to the sentence "I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience". Still... look who "wrote" it. Did you just say "chav speak"! Five Ws - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ws The Five Ws (sometimes referred to as Five Ws and How, 5W1H, or Six Ws) are questions whose answers are considered basic in information gathering or problem solving. They are often mentioned in journalism (cf. news style), research and police investigations. -- Bod |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:30:13 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Which Was What We Wanted. AKA QED. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 18:02, Bod wrote:
On 12/07/2019 17:39, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 16:53, Bod wrote: On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why *If* that is what it means in chav-speak, it was a particularly mystifying response to the sentence "I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience". Still... look who "wrote" it. Did you just say "chav speak"! Is that an exclamation or a question? Five Ws - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ws The Five Ws (sometimes referred to as Five Ws and How, 5W1H, or Six Ws) are questions whose answers are considered basic in information gathering or problem solving. They are often mentioned in journalism (cf. news style), research and police investigations. Never heard of it. I far prefer English. Even the uSA version makes more intuitive sense than that. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 18:26, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 18:02, Bod wrote: On 12/07/2019 17:39, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 16:53, Bod wrote: On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why *If* that is what it means in chav-speak, it was a particularly mystifying response to the sentence "I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience". Still... look who "wrote" it. Â* Â* Did you just say "chav speak"! Is that an exclamation or a question? Five Ws - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ws The Five Ws (sometimes referred to as Five Ws and How, 5W1H, or Six Ws) are questions whose answers are considered basic in information gathering or problem solving. They are often mentioned in journalism (cf. news style), research and police investigations. Never heard of it. I far prefer English. Even the uSA version makes more intuitive sense than that. The exclamation point is a mark of terminal punctuation. As such, it should not be followed by a period or question mark. Some writers will use both a question mark and exclamation point for an exclamatory question, but only the exclamation point is truly necessary. What in the world are you doing up there! Exclamation point | The Punctuation Guide https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/...ion-point.html -- Bod |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 17:39, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 16:53, Bod wrote: On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why *If* that is what it means in chav-speak, it was a particularly mystifying response to the sentence "I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience". Still... look who "wrote" it. past tense is writ |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 16:53, Bod wrote: On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why *If* that is what it means in chav-speak, it was a particularly mystifying response to the sentence "I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience". Still... look who "wrote" it. I'm new to this interweb thing and did not know that. Thanks. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
Bod wrote:
On 12/07/2019 15:30, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. If you received a NIP through the post accusing you of jumping a red light would you expect the Police to provide actual evidence? I would expect so. But it isn't something of which I have ever had experience. W5 What does W5 mean? Who, What, Where, When & Why Thank you. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. You still need to provide evidence to support this claim. I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green. "We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. You still need to provide evidence to support this claim. I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green. ....thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green. "We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology. You accused the police of lying. I owe them no apology, not having accused them of anything. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. You still need to provide evidence to support this claim. I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green. ...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green. No, just asking for evidence that it was. If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian? "We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology. You accused the police of lying. A claim you still need to prove. I owe them no apology, not having accused them of anything. Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6 foot tall scumbag cyclist hospitalises OAP | MrCheerful | UK | 24 | April 5th 19 02:18 PM |
Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 38 | January 29th 16 07:51 AM |
Hull cyclist mows down OAP and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 4 | October 22nd 14 09:33 AM |
Cyclist hospitalises 70 y/o waiting for a bus | Mrcheerful | UK | 1 | September 29th 14 08:02 PM |
Cyclist causes a crash and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 11 | November 7th 13 09:50 PM |