|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. You still need to provide evidence to support this claim. I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green. ...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green. No, just asking for evidence that it was. If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian? He might. And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes. "We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology. You accused the police of lying. A claim you still need to prove. *You* proved it by doing it. I owe them no apology, not having accused them of anything. Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology. Act your age. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote: On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. You still need to provide evidence to support this claim. I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green. ...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green. No, just asking for evidence that it was. If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian? He might. And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes. "We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology. You accused the police of lying. A claim you still need to prove. *You* proved it by doing it. So why don't you just provide the evidence to support your claim. I owe them no apology, not having accused them of anything. Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology. Act your age. I am, unlike you. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote: On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. You still need to provide evidence to support this claim. I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green. ...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green. No, just asking for evidence that it was. If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian? He might. And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes. "We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology. You accused the police of lying. A claim you still need to prove. *You* proved it by doing it. So why don't you just provide the evidence to support your claim. The claim that you think the police are lying? *You* provided that, with your questioning of it. It's way too late for you to think of withdrawing it. I owe them no apology, not having accused them of anything. Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology. Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 13/07/2019 19:30, Simon Jester wrote: On Saturday, July 13, 2019 at 12:00:31 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 20:36, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:26:15 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 14:26, Simon Jester wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:48:48 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 12/07/2019 03:22, Simon Jester wrote: Where did I say the Police were lying? Please cite the actual text. You quoted this: "...The police told us she did nothing wrong, the light went green for her to cross..." Then you asked: "If the Police were not on scene how do they know this?" You can only ask such a question if you think that the police were lying when they "...told us she did nothing wrong [and that] the light went green for her to cross...". Thank you proving I did not say the police were lying. All I asked was how they knew the pedestrian light was green. I look forward to reading your apology. I have nothing to apologise to the police for. It was not I who accused them of lying. That was you. You still need to provide evidence to support this claim. I asked how the Police know the pedestrian light was green. ...thereby attempting (though failing) to argue that the light (for the pedestrian victim of the criminal on the bike) was not green. No, just asking for evidence that it was. If this was a court do you think the advocate for the cyclist would ask the testifying officer how he knows for certain the light was green for the pedestrian? He might. And he would be given the answer from the officer's notes. "We have CCTV footage" would be one answer. There are other possibilities but I did not accuse the Police of lying. That is why you owe me an apology. You accused the police of lying. A claim you still need to prove. *You* proved it by doing it. So why don't you just provide the evidence to support your claim. The claim that you think the police are lying? *You* provided that, with your questioning of it. It's way too late for you to think of withdrawing it. Still waiting for your evidence. I owe them no apology, not having accused them of anything. Unless you can provide evidence I accused to police of lying you owe me, not the police, an apology. Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. W^5 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. W^5 Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's head explode. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. W^5 Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's head explode. Nugents takes itselves far too seriously. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote: On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. W^5 Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's head explode. Nugents takes itselves far too seriously. Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very easily exposes you as being a prat. You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be. Cycling is painfully slow. Involves great physical effort. You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather. Makes you sweaty & smelly. Cause piles. Reduces sperm count. Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie. Unable to carry passengers or goods. People laugh at you. Makes you a sponging freeloader. Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic. Pedestrians hate you. Drivers hate you. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 6:49:59 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote: On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. W^5 Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's head explode. Nugents takes itselves far too seriously. Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very easily exposes you as being a prat. You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be. Cycling is painfully slow. Involves great physical effort. You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather. Makes you sweaty & smelly. Cause piles. Reduces sperm count. Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie. Unable to carry passengers or goods. People laugh at you. Makes you a sponging freeloader. Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic. Pedestrians hate you. Drivers hate you. W^5 |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 14/07/2019 19:38, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 6:49:59 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote: On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. W^5 Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's head explode. so Nugents takes itselves far too seriously. Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very easily exposes you as being a prat. You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be. Cycling is painfully slow. Involves great physical effort. You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather. Makes you sweaty & smelly. Cause piles. Reduces sperm count. Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie. Unable to carry passengers or goods. People laugh at you. Makes you a sponging freeloader. Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic. Pedestrians hate you. Drivers hate you. W^5 Also W5H :-) -- Bod |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
RLJ cyclist hospitalises 81 year old and scarpers
On 14. 7. 2019 19:49, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 9:22:04 AM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote: On 14/07/2019 02:23, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:57:05 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 14/07/2019 01:16, Simon Jester wrote: On Sunday, July 14, 2019 at 1:09:32 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: Act your age. I am, unlike you. Pathetic. W^5 Isn't this fun? I wonder if we could work out a way of making Noddy's head explode. Nugents takes itselves far too seriously. Mr Nugent is a lot cleverer than you. With every post he makes he very easily exposes you as being a prat. You are a cyclist, and that is all you ever will be. Cycling is painfully slow. Involves great physical effort. You get soaked/frozen/roasted/blown over by the weather. Makes you sweaty & smelly. Cause piles. Reduces sperm count. Makes you dress like an extra in a gay rave movie. Unable to carry passengers or goods. People laugh at you. Makes you a sponging freeloader. Leaves you vulnerable to proper traffic. Pedestrians hate you. Drivers hate you. I am a bicyclist. Get used to it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6 foot tall scumbag cyclist hospitalises OAP | MrCheerful | UK | 24 | April 5th 19 02:18 PM |
Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 38 | January 29th 16 07:51 AM |
Hull cyclist mows down OAP and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 4 | October 22nd 14 09:33 AM |
Cyclist hospitalises 70 y/o waiting for a bus | Mrcheerful | UK | 1 | September 29th 14 08:02 PM |
Cyclist causes a crash and scarpers | Mrcheerful | UK | 11 | November 7th 13 09:50 PM |