#61
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On 11/7/2019 9:55 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:04:13 -0800, Joerg wrote: That will result in an impressive plume of smoke and probably a stench in the neighborhood. Seems you never operated a wood stove. One lets the solid fuel soak up the liquid fuel before putting it into the stove. I burn a lot of kitchen grease. But on the outdoor hearth; we gave up the wood stove in the late twentieth century because we had it connected to a fireplace chimney, and I got tired of unexpectedly hosting a gathering of the local fire company. (Since they were our lodge brothers, this was embarassing.) We eventually gave our wood stove to someone who could connect it to a proper stove chimney. Rather a pity; the house was much warmer at a given temperature when heated with a stove, and the sit-quietly areas were warmer than the bustle-around-working-up-a-sweat areas. I think that's due to the radiant heating. It seems to be the most comfortable. I've wondered about some sort of small radiant heat panel, for added comfort of my wife during winter rocking chair nights. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:51:43 -0000 (UTC), news18
wrote: On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:51:21 +0700, John B. wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 03:33:41 -0000 (UTC), news18 wrote: On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 05:49:46 +0700, John B. wrote: On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:04:13 -0800, Joerg wrote: That will result in an impressive plume of smoke and probably a stench in the neighborhood. Seems you never operated a wood stove. Quite the contrary, we heated our house, my grand parents heated their house, our neighbors heated their houses, with wood. My maternal grand mother even cooked on a wood stove when I was a little chap. YOU, probaby know how to operate such stove for minimal pollution, but i've met many people who do not have a clue and produce a lot of smoke and toxic fumes(cyanide treated pine is very popular collected wood). Is that a treatment for use as fence posts? Yep, play equipment, garden edging and everythig that is made of pine and stuck in the ground. Puke green colour. Of course I grew up in a small town and thus was countrified, so to speak, but back then folks used different wood for different purposes. Fence posts were one sort of wood and the walls of a house were a different. Pine, which would have been white Pine in that country certainly wasn't a popular selection for fence posts. What happened? All the good fence post wood got chopped down? -- cheers, John B. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:03:14 -0500, Frank Krygowski
wrote: On 11/7/2019 10:48 PM, John B. wrote: On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:55:28 -0500, Joy Beeson wrote: On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:04:13 -0800, Joerg wrote: That will result in an impressive plume of smoke and probably a stench in the neighborhood. Seems you never operated a wood stove. One lets the solid fuel soak up the liquid fuel before putting it into the stove. I burn a lot of kitchen grease. But on the outdoor hearth; we gave up the wood stove in the late twentieth century because we had it connected to a fireplace chimney, and I got tired of unexpectedly hosting a gathering of the local fire company. (Since they were our lodge brothers, this was embarassing.) We eventually gave our wood stove to someone who could connect it to a proper stove chimney. Rather a pity; the house was much warmer at a given temperature when heated with a stove, and the sit-quietly areas were warmer than the bustle-around-working-up-a-sweat areas. The technique used to be to put the stove across the room from the chimney.Then run the stove pipe across the room, up near the ceiling, so that you radiate heat not only from the stove but from 10 feet or so of stovepipe. More heat from less stove wood. One of my back-to-industry sabbaticals was in a little company that had recently moved into a building that had been a car body shop. The only heat was a gas fired hot pipe across the ceiling, with reflectors above to shine the infra-red downward. It was very comfortable under that hot pipe, even though it was about 15 feet up. The rest of the plant was chilly indeed. I wonder, as hot air rises would some fans, blowing down, above or next to the pipe have warmed the building better? -- cheers, John B. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:06:17 -0500, Frank Krygowski
wrote: On 11/7/2019 9:55 PM, Joy Beeson wrote: On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:04:13 -0800, Joerg wrote: That will result in an impressive plume of smoke and probably a stench in the neighborhood. Seems you never operated a wood stove. One lets the solid fuel soak up the liquid fuel before putting it into the stove. I burn a lot of kitchen grease. But on the outdoor hearth; we gave up the wood stove in the late twentieth century because we had it connected to a fireplace chimney, and I got tired of unexpectedly hosting a gathering of the local fire company. (Since they were our lodge brothers, this was embarassing.) We eventually gave our wood stove to someone who could connect it to a proper stove chimney. Rather a pity; the house was much warmer at a given temperature when heated with a stove, and the sit-quietly areas were warmer than the bustle-around-working-up-a-sweat areas. I think that's due to the radiant heating. It seems to be the most comfortable. I've wondered about some sort of small radiant heat panel, for added comfort of my wife during winter rocking chair nights. I was visiting a friend in Perth, Australia in the "winter time" (that is June and July :-) and he had a smallish infra red heater in the ceiling of his bathroom and in weather where you started shivering as soon as you got out of bed the bathroom was warm enough to stand, comfortably warm, while you toweled yourself off after a shower. -- cheers, John B. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:48:07 +0700, John B.
wrote: The technique used to be to put the stove across the room from the chimney.Then run the stove pipe across the room, up near the ceiling, so that you radiate heat not only from the stove but from 10 feet or so of stovepipe. More heat from less stove wood. The parlor stove that my parents used before I was born went one better. I've no idea where in the parlor the stove was in relation to the hole in the ceiling, but the hole in the floor was in the middle of the room above, and the chimney was in the wall between the "hall", as we called that bedroom, and the little bedroom. The hole in the floor is long gone -- it fell victim to my older sisters' habit of putting their legs through it while my parents were entertaining guests -- but the indoors part of the chimney might still be there. (My sister had the external parts of unused chimneys removed as part of a roof repair.) Should we ever gather at my nephew-in-law's house, I must go up and look. The fireplace in the kitchen was added when we added central heat, running water, and electric light with the money Dad earned at DelCo Remy during WWII. At the same time, the kitchen became the utility room, the living room became the kitchen, and the parlor became the living room. Mom cooked in the fireplace on special occasions. Most of the time she used her wonderful Anderson gas range with a brick-lined oven. -- Joy Beeson joy beeson at comcast dot net http://wlweather.net/PAGEJOY/ |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 23:48:02 -0500, Joy Beeson
wrote: On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:48:07 +0700, John B. wrote: The technique used to be to put the stove across the room from the chimney.Then run the stove pipe across the room, up near the ceiling, so that you radiate heat not only from the stove but from 10 feet or so of stovepipe. More heat from less stove wood. The parlor stove that my parents used before I was born went one better. I've no idea where in the parlor the stove was in relation to the hole in the ceiling, but the hole in the floor was in the middle of the room above, and the chimney was in the wall between the "hall", as we called that bedroom, and the little bedroom. My grandparents, my father's people, house had a ventilator, or maybe they might be termed "radiator" from the "front room" to the bedroom upstairs. They were just round holes in the floor but they had a sort of grill in them, top and bottom, that prevented sticking one's legs through them. Typical two story New England house of that era. Big front door that opened into a "front hall" with a sort of grand staircase going upstairs and a door on each side going into the two sides of the house which were two rooms up and down with a bathroom upstairs. Each side had a large kitchen and a "front room". Wood cooking stove in the kitchen and a "parlor stove" in the Front Room. The Front Door was never used, unless of course the Preacher were to visit and everyone used the kitchen door. And life was pretty much confined to the kitchen. The wood burning "cook stove" had been converted to kerosene sometime before I can remember and I remember my grandmother sort of muttering about all this modern stuff and bemoaning the lack of wood as she said wood baked beans better. Also the stove had a sort of water sump on the right hand side and the kerosene didn't heat the water. The "ice box" was out on the kitchen porch as my grandmother reckoned that the ice melted slower outdoors. The hole in the floor is long gone -- it fell victim to my older sisters' habit of putting their legs through it while my parents were entertaining guests -- but the indoors part of the chimney might still be there. (My sister had the external parts of unused chimneys removed as part of a roof repair.) Should we ever gather at my nephew-in-law's house, I must go up and look. The fireplace in the kitchen was added when we added central heat, running water, and electric light with the money Dad earned at DelCo Remy during WWII. At the same time, the kitchen became the utility room, the living room became the kitchen, and the parlor became the living room. Mom cooked in the fireplace on special occasions. Most of the time she used her wonderful Anderson gas range with a brick-lined oven. -- cheers, John B. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:14:35 +0700, John B. wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:06:17 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 11/7/2019 9:55 PM, Joy Beeson wrote: On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:04:13 -0800, Joerg wrote: That will result in an impressive plume of smoke and probably a stench in the neighborhood. Seems you never operated a wood stove. One lets the solid fuel soak up the liquid fuel before putting it into the stove. I burn a lot of kitchen grease. But on the outdoor hearth; we gave up the wood stove in the late twentieth century because we had it connected to a fireplace chimney, and I got tired of unexpectedly hosting a gathering of the local fire company. (Since they were our lodge brothers, this was embarassing.) We eventually gave our wood stove to someone who could connect it to a proper stove chimney. Rather a pity; the house was much warmer at a given temperature when heated with a stove, and the sit-quietly areas were warmer than the bustle-around-working-up-a-sweat areas. I think that's due to the radiant heating. It seems to be the most comfortable. I've wondered about some sort of small radiant heat panel, for added comfort of my wife during winter rocking chair nights. I was visiting a friend in Perth, Australia in the "winter time" (that is June and July :-) and he had a smallish infra red heater in the ceiling of his bathroom and in weather where you started shivering as soon as you got out of bed the bathroom was warm enough to stand, comfortably warm, while you toweled yourself off after a shower. When you buy those, you buy a second one and stash it away to rob for replacement globes. Otherwise, the spare globes cost more than the originaL complete unit. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 23:48:02 -0500,
Joy Beeson wrote: On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:48:07 +0700, John B. wrote: The technique used to be to put the stove across the room from the chimney.Then run the stove pipe across the room, up near the ceiling, so that you radiate heat not only from the stove but from 10 feet or so of stovepipe. More heat from less stove wood. The parlor stove that my parents used before I was born went one better. I've no idea where in the parlor the stove was in relation to the hole in the ceiling, but the hole in the floor was in the middle of the room above, and the chimney was in the wall between the "hall", as we called that bedroom, and the little bedroom. The hole in the floor is long gone -- it fell victim to my older sisters' habit of putting their legs through it while my parents were entertaining guests -- but the indoors part of the chimney might still be there. (My sister had the external parts of unused chimneys removed as part of a roof repair.) Should we ever gather at my nephew-in-law's house, I must go up and look. The fireplace in the kitchen was added when we added central heat, running water, and electric light with the money Dad earned at DelCo Remy during WWII. At the same time, the kitchen became the utility room, the living room became the kitchen, and the parlor became the living room. Many years ago I read about a Russian woodstove that was especially good at radiating a high portion of the heat from a wood fire. Sounded (andstill does) like a nice approach. https://www.motherearthnews.com/diy/...s-zmaz97onzgoe Mom cooked in the fireplace on special occasions. Most of the time she used her wonderful Anderson gas range with a brick-lined oven. I cooked professionaly for many years, and can say without any doubt whatsoever that there is nothing like a commerical gas range for cooking. -- Ted Heise West Lafayette, IN, USA |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On 2019-11-07 14:49, John B. wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:04:13 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2019-11-06 20:24, John B. wrote: On Wed, 06 Nov 2019 16:46:19 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2019-11-06 15:17, John B. wrote: On Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:57:44 -0800, Joerg wrote: On 2019-11-05 18:38, jbeattie wrote: On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 10:05:03 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2019-11-05 08:35, jbeattie wrote: On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 6:55:56 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote: On 2019-11-05 04:21, wrote: On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 10:35:51 PM UTC+1, Joerg wrote: On 2019-10-16 09:44, Tom Kunich wrote: My Basso Loto was one of the final steel versions. It seemed to have a perfect ride. However, since I took it apart to refinish it I got the Lemond and between the ride of the Colnago CLX 3.0 and the ride of the Lemond Zurich made out of Reynolds 853 I will have to test it again. In any case it will be my spare rider. Presently I have the frame and fork in the powder coaters and expect them to get around to it around the end of next week. I was not enthused about the original colors of the Loto - Yellow and Blue with a red highlight. So I'm having it a solid "transparent blue" which they had a sample of when I was there. A hot rodder was having his rims coated. I had been planning on Candy Apple Blue but they had a hot rodder's transmission there finished in that color and the "Transparent Blue" looked a little cleaner. These guys have gone from finishing store shelves and the like to coating entire cars for hot rodders in the Trump economy. They had a pickup truck there they were about to put in the oven while I was there. It would cook to a metallic yellow. After I pick the frame and fork up I will have to get a set of Basso Loto decals, then coat the entire frame with clear. I learned from the last try on the Pinarello and will use many very light coats instead of a few heavy. And then have the bottom bracket threads cleaned and the Campy headset that was in it re-installed. I just finished building a tubeless wheel up. The deep carbon wheels are remarkably difficult to build. Off and on it took me three days to get that thing properly centered and true when I could build an aluminum wheel in a couple of hours easy. Wow, you are really going all out when it comes to your rides. I am the exact opposite. Both my MTB and my road bike have lots of scrapes and are generally caked in copious amounts of dried mud. Add in a few grease streaks and some vegetation mashed deep into the works here and there. My wife thinks the bikes look disgusting but then again this greatly reduces the chance of them being stolen. The money for the decals would in my case be invested in IPA, Imperial Stout or something similar. So you are a really tough guy then. It makes you proud? OK...oh wait are you not the one who cleans his chain with inter dental brushes? That is really girlisch... No, that's smart. It milks a lot more miles out of a chain than other mountain bikers on similar trails get. Out of curiosity, how do you know that? Do you stop other cyclists on the trail and say "hey, how many miles do you get out of your chains, and do you use dental brushes to clean them link-by-link"? I regularly talk with other MTB riders at brewpubs. Most said they don't even get 1000mi out of a chain. What kind of chain are they using? 8/9/10/11 speed? What are you using? And what does flossing between the links do to clean out the pin-bushing interface? You would probably do better with conventional cleaning and lubrication. Most are 10-speed, rarely 9-speed. KMC seems to be the main brand and that is what I also use. Doesn't matter, the chains are similar. It's not flossing but I am (re-) using these: https://www.costco.com/gum-soft-pick...100526764.html What it does is remove oily and grimy clumps and "plaque" from the area where the rollers tough the links. Otherwise the new lube won't go in there well. Yes, a chain wash is better but that requires liquids, drying, and is environmentally questionalbe IMO because you have to dump the resulting oily liquid somewhere. And don't do that in the sink or the open space. I thoroughly clean and maintain moving or mission-critical stuff, very regularly. Chain, sprockets, brake components, bearings, lights et cetera. Whether the downtube has mud caked on it or not is only a cosmetic difference. Oh yeah, and it may cost me 0.1% in my average speed. One major upside of a muddy-looking bike is that potential thieves generally don't want that one. They go for another bike. Again, how do you know that? Do you do A/B theft tests -- muddy versus non-muddy bikes? Maybe put a muddy, unlocked S-Works Tarmac Di2 bike next to a super-clean Huffy POS and see which gets stolen first? Of course I mean similar bikes. Di2 is an invitation "Steal me, steal me!". Most thieves around here are after a quick buck to feed their drug habits. A nice shiny name brand bike will instantly get them their $30 or whatever at the cladestine chop shop, a filthy one won't. It's rather obvious and I had talked at length with law enforcement experts about such things. They said the same thing about homes. A modest abode has a lower chance of being broken into versus a manicured mansion. Law enforcement officers know about the relative number of muddy versus non-muddy bikes that get stolen. Incroyable. I seems to me like one would have to do A/B testing to prove that point. They do know about the chance of ugly versus non-ugly items being stolen. These were case investigors, not patrol officers. But even those know if seasoned enough. The key is what I had mentioned: How marketable is a stolen item and how quickly can it be turned into drug money? The shiny bike gets them money fast, the ugly one gets them nothing. So ... Aren't you the guy with the wood burning heat? Just toss the oily liquid on the wood pile. After all wood smoke contains In addition to particle pollution, several toxic harmful air pollutants including: benzene, formaldehyde, acrolein, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). With all that what's a little extra? We have one of those super-clean certified stoves that emits only a gram of particulate matter per hour and no smoke. In fact, once when I was cleaning the pellet stove vent I burned my arm while placing tools on the chimney. I had forgotten that the wood stove was still going on the other flue. The was absolutely no smell and I was standing right next to the storm cap. Well, there you go. Just dump the used cleaning fluid in the stove and it will be magically destroyed with no harm to the atmosphere. That will result in an impressive plume of smoke and probably a stench in the neighborhood. Seems you never operated a wood stove. Quite the contrary, we heated our house, my grand parents heated their house, our neighbors heated their houses, with wood. My maternal grand mother even cooked on a wood stove when I was a little chap. But you were bragging about a stove that "burned clean" so I assumed that it actually did burn clean, and now you are telling me that it doesn't burn clean? If you dump a cold oily substance into it there will be a substantial puff of unhealthy smoke. If you used a wood stove you should know that. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Basso Loto [OT]
On 2019-11-07 19:29, news18 wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:04:13 -0800, Joerg wrote: That will result in an impressive plume of smoke and probably a stench in the neighborhood. Seems you never operated a wood stove. That stench here comes from the kerosenes heaters. Oil heating was very popular in Germany where I lived earlier. However, even in the 60's the inspector who was also the (required) chimney sweep measured the soot content on a regular basis. The limits became ever more strict and if your installation couldn't get below the limit it was de-certified for further use until repaired or replaced. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
62 cm Basso | Tom Kunich | Marketplace | 2 | March 2nd 12 10:24 PM |
Basso all 3?? | Lee Golding | Racing | 4 | May 20th 06 09:42 AM |
Basso vs. Armstrong, where did Basso lose his time? | Chris M | Racing | 10 | July 22nd 05 05:43 PM |
Basso is out... | Keith | Racing | 0 | July 12th 05 04:04 PM |
said Basso | Thomas Lund | Racing | 0 | May 27th 05 10:34 PM |