A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Racing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What - Intelligent Thought?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #291  
Old February 25th 07, 09:04 PM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Joe Cipale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default What - Intelligent Thought?

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
On Feb 24, 3:18 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

Cipale.bot wrote in message

...


numbnutz... she is smarter than you will ever be...



Her sort of "intelligence" is nothing I would ever hope to achieve.
What did she or you do other than state the patently obvious? But to
be fair, I would give her the benefit of the doubt when speaking for
herself -- after all, it is *you* that has represented her here.


Being married to you disproves that theory right off the bat.



{Laughs}


The wind-up for me was russell.bot writing:

"Of course, the fact is most people in the U.S. also support our form
"of quasi-socialism."

I've heard the same sort of comment many times before by a "certain
variety" of statists, and thus it is a more or less valid stereotype.
One would think that if "most people" were for it, then participation
would hardly need to be compulsory. But "they" insist that it must be
compulsory, and elect "representatives" to force participation under
threat of violence.

Which means, of course, that "they" are simply dishonest: socialists
are liars and worse yet, thieves. It can't be a simple problem of
ignorance. Okay,... I suppose naked stupidity could be an
explanation. It is a plausible explanation for chipale.bot, if not
for others.


Whatever.. good night child.
Ads
  #292  
Old February 28th 07, 05:16 AM posted to rec.bicycles.racing
Carl Sundquist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,810
Default What - Intelligent Thought?


wrote in message
oups.com...

You have to give Tom points for stubbornness or
something, 'cause he always picks his opposite number's
area of expertise. He argues about SIGINT with Curtis,
planetary atmospheres with me, GI armor with Bill, ocean
temperatures with Bill Asher, health care with Chung,
masters racing with Chang, TT'ing with Kevin Metcalfe ...

I mean, if he mixed it up and argued about SIGINT with
me, TT'ing with Bill, body armor with Chung, and planets
with Curtis, maybe he'd win one, but he refuses to take
the easy way out. I respect that kind of integrity.
Also, this might require his victims to argue on subjects
of which they are ignorant, but that's trespassing on
Tom's area of expertise.


I thought that was Hansen's turf. Is Kunich another one of the Hansen
brothers?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anybody care to say something intelligent about Landis' web defense ? [email protected] Racing 21 October 14th 06 02:15 PM
[totally OT] NYT Article about Intelligent Design Ernst Noch Racing 63 September 1st 05 06:25 PM
Intelligent comment Mikefule Unicycling 25 July 21st 05 03:05 AM
more intelligent computers Miles General 7 December 8th 04 01:52 AM
The Neanderthals: More Intelligent than Mountain Bikers! Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 7 September 30th 03 04:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.