|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
In a race you need the latest equipment. Campy or Shimano top of the line
stuff, carbon fiber bikes, saddles without padding etc. The problem is that people who don't race buy this stuff because they think it's the "best" instead of "appropriate for racing". Today we're seeing people riding around on the streets on equipment that barely has a working life of a year and they don't know that. Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. I can't tell you how many carbon hinged rear derailers I've seen with broken pieces. And these aren't cheap. You're paying a small fortune to save 12 grams on a part that will never see a race for most people. Mind you, Campagnolo and Shimano make components that are plenty reliable and long lived. The top of the line stuff is designed to meet other criteria. They are building them for the lightest possible weight now and that means that they had to make decisions about product lifespan. Since these parts are designed to be used by racers and are replaced, at the far end, every year it means that you can't expect the best parts to have a lifespan compatible with normal bicycle use. It is true that most bicyclists who buy the most expensive stuff generally don't ride all that much. And since they could afford the stuff in the first place it isn't as if they can't afford to replace it when it gets broken. But be aware that now it isn't just the components that are failing. Now entire wheels, forks and frames are failing catastrophically and when they do you're going down and it might be really hard. Personally I'm six months into recovery from a failed front fork (caused by a foot turned loose by a failed new fangled pedal). The foot could never have gotten into the spokes of an older 32 spoke or more wheel but went right in that expensive low spoke count wheel. Last year a medium sized dog ran in front of a guy with whom I was riding. The dog was essentially uninjured. The steering head broke off the bike and my friend went head first into the asphalt. He broke his neck and for a long hour I supposed he'd be dying. He survived and rides today. But if he was riding a steel bike with a steel fork he wouldn't have crashed like that. Here's the bottom line - if you're racing go ahead and use the lightest stuff available. If you're training or just out on a ride maybe you ought to be using stuff that you can rely upon. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
IN A RACE YOU DO NOT NEED THE LATEST EQUIPMENT.
Here's the bottom line: If you're racing you DO NOT need the latest equipment. If you're racing, come prepared. If you're training or just out on a ride, and assuming you have disposible income to burn, go ahead and get another bike with less bling and that way you'll be really safe, and don't forget to wear a helmet because helmets will prevent you from becoming an organ donor, but don't wear your "racing" helmet, rather, wear a helmet that you can rely upon. Thanks, Magilla "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote in message m... In a race you need the latest equipment. Campy or Shimano top of the line stuff, carbon fiber bikes, saddles without padding etc. The problem is that people who don't race buy this stuff because they think it's the "best" instead of "appropriate for racing". Today we're seeing people riding around on the streets on equipment that barely has a working life of a year and they don't know that. Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. I can't tell you how many carbon hinged rear derailers I've seen with broken pieces. And these aren't cheap. You're paying a small fortune to save 12 grams on a part that will never see a race for most people. Mind you, Campagnolo and Shimano make components that are plenty reliable and long lived. The top of the line stuff is designed to meet other criteria. They are building them for the lightest possible weight now and that means that they had to make decisions about product lifespan. Since these parts are designed to be used by racers and are replaced, at the far end, every year it means that you can't expect the best parts to have a lifespan compatible with normal bicycle use. It is true that most bicyclists who buy the most expensive stuff generally don't ride all that much. And since they could afford the stuff in the first place it isn't as if they can't afford to replace it when it gets broken. But be aware that now it isn't just the components that are failing. Now entire wheels, forks and frames are failing catastrophically and when they do you're going down and it might be really hard. Personally I'm six months into recovery from a failed front fork (caused by a foot turned loose by a failed new fangled pedal). The foot could never have gotten into the spokes of an older 32 spoke or more wheel but went right in that expensive low spoke count wheel. Last year a medium sized dog ran in front of a guy with whom I was riding. The dog was essentially uninjured. The steering head broke off the bike and my friend went head first into the asphalt. He broke his neck and for a long hour I supposed he'd be dying. He survived and rides today. But if he was riding a steel bike with a steel fork he wouldn't have crashed like that. Here's the bottom line - if you're racing go ahead and use the lightest stuff available. If you're training or just out on a ride maybe you ought to be using stuff that you can rely upon. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
Dear Magilla,
Your post doesn't even respond to what he was saying, your moron. Everything Tom said below is correct and Magilla-certified. A lot of you dumbasses in here ride around "training" on 16 pound bikes with carbon fiber chains and frames made out of balsa wood. Hinault rode on steel. Steel is for real men. Magilla Magilla Gorilla wrote: IN A RACE YOU DO NOT NEED THE LATEST EQUIPMENT. Here's the bottom line: If you're racing you DO NOT need the latest equipment. If you're racing, come prepared. If you're training or just out on a ride, and assuming you have disposible income to burn, go ahead and get another bike with less bling and that way you'll be really safe, and don't forget to wear a helmet because helmets will prevent you from becoming an organ donor, but don't wear your "racing" helmet, rather, wear a helmet that you can rely upon. Thanks, Magilla "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote in message m... In a race you need the latest equipment. Campy or Shimano top of the line stuff, carbon fiber bikes, saddles without padding etc. The problem is that people who don't race buy this stuff because they think it's the "best" instead of "appropriate for racing". Today we're seeing people riding around on the streets on equipment that barely has a working life of a year and they don't know that. Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. I can't tell you how many carbon hinged rear derailers I've seen with broken pieces. And these aren't cheap. You're paying a small fortune to save 12 grams on a part that will never see a race for most people. Mind you, Campagnolo and Shimano make components that are plenty reliable and long lived. The top of the line stuff is designed to meet other criteria. They are building them for the lightest possible weight now and that means that they had to make decisions about product lifespan. Since these parts are designed to be used by racers and are replaced, at the far end, every year it means that you can't expect the best parts to have a lifespan compatible with normal bicycle use. It is true that most bicyclists who buy the most expensive stuff generally don't ride all that much. And since they could afford the stuff in the first place it isn't as if they can't afford to replace it when it gets broken. But be aware that now it isn't just the components that are failing. Now entire wheels, forks and frames are failing catastrophically and when they do you're going down and it might be really hard. Personally I'm six months into recovery from a failed front fork (caused by a foot turned loose by a failed new fangled pedal). The foot could never have gotten into the spokes of an older 32 spoke or more wheel but went right in that expensive low spoke count wheel. Last year a medium sized dog ran in front of a guy with whom I was riding. The dog was essentially uninjured. The steering head broke off the bike and my friend went head first into the asphalt. He broke his neck and for a long hour I supposed he'd be dying. He survived and rides today. But if he was riding a steel bike with a steel fork he wouldn't have crashed like that. Here's the bottom line - if you're racing go ahead and use the lightest stuff available. If you're training or just out on a ride maybe you ought to be using stuff that you can rely upon. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
On Dec 4, 8:57*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
In a race you need the latest equipment. Campy or Shimano top of the line stuff, carbon fiber bikes, saddles without padding etc. The problem is that people who don't race buy this stuff because they think it's the "best" instead of "appropriate for racing". Today we're seeing people riding around on the streets on equipment that barely has a working life of a year and they don't know that. Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. I can't tell you how many carbon hinged rear derailers I've seen with broken pieces. And these aren't cheap. You're paying a small fortune to save 12 grams on a part that will never see a race for most people. Mind you, Campagnolo and Shimano make components that are plenty reliable and long lived. The top of the line stuff is designed to meet other criteria. They are building them for the lightest possible weight now and that means that they had to make decisions about product lifespan. Since these parts are designed to be used by racers and are replaced, at the far end, every year it means that you can't expect the best parts to have a lifespan compatible with normal bicycle use. It is true that most bicyclists who buy the most expensive stuff generally don't ride all that much. And since they could afford the stuff in the first place it isn't as if they can't afford to replace it when it gets broken. But be aware that now it isn't just the components that are failing. Now entire wheels, forks and frames are failing catastrophically and when they do you're going down and it might be really hard. Personally I'm six months into recovery from a failed front fork (caused by a foot turned loose by a failed new fangled pedal). The foot could never have gotten into the spokes of an older 32 spoke or more wheel but went right in that expensive low spoke count wheel. Last year a medium sized dog ran in front of a guy with whom I was riding.. The dog was essentially uninjured. The steering head broke off the bike and my friend went head first into the asphalt. He broke his neck and for a long hour I supposed he'd be dying. He survived and rides today. But if he was riding a steel bike with a steel fork he wouldn't have crashed like that. Here's the bottom line - if you're racing go ahead and use the lightest stuff available. If you're training or just out on a ride maybe you ought to be using stuff that you can rely upon. Reality, what a concept. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
MagillaGorilla wrote:
Dear Magilla, Your post doesn't even respond to what he was saying, your moron. Everything Tom said below is correct and Magilla-certified. A lot of you dumbasses in here ride around "training" on 16 pound bikes with carbon fiber chains and frames made out of balsa wood. Hinault rode on steel. Steel is for real men. My manliness is validated, then. Thanks, I was waiting for someone to do that for me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
Tom Kunich wrote:
In a race you need the latest equipment. Campy or Shimano top of the line stuff, carbon fiber bikes, saddles without padding etc. The problem is that people who don't race buy this stuff because they think it's the "best" instead of "appropriate for racing". Today we're seeing people riding around on the streets on equipment that barely has a working life of a year and they don't know that. Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. I can't tell you how many carbon hinged rear derailers I've seen with broken pieces. And these aren't cheap. You're paying a small fortune to save 12 grams on a part that will never see a race for most people. Mind you, Campagnolo and Shimano make components that are plenty reliable and long lived. The top of the line stuff is designed to meet other criteria. They are building them for the lightest possible weight now and that means that they had to make decisions about product lifespan. Since these parts are designed to be used by racers and are replaced, at the far end, every year it means that you can't expect the best parts to have a lifespan compatible with normal bicycle use. It is true that most bicyclists who buy the most expensive stuff generally don't ride all that much. And since they could afford the stuff in the first place it isn't as if they can't afford to replace it when it gets broken. But be aware that now it isn't just the components that are failing. Now entire wheels, forks and frames are failing catastrophically and when they do you're going down and it might be really hard. Personally I'm six months into recovery from a failed front fork (caused by a foot turned loose by a failed new fangled pedal). The foot could never have gotten into the spokes of an older 32 spoke or more wheel but went right in that expensive low spoke count wheel. Last year a medium sized dog ran in front of a guy with whom I was riding. The dog was essentially uninjured. The steering head broke off the bike and my friend went head first into the asphalt. He broke his neck and for a long hour I supposed he'd be dying. He survived and rides today. But if he was riding a steel bike with a steel fork he wouldn't have crashed like that. Here's the bottom line - if you're racing go ahead and use the lightest stuff available. If you're training or just out on a ride maybe you ought to be using stuff that you can rely upon. What is the wheel manufacturer that you were referring to? thanks |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
On Dec 4, 7:57*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
Today we're seeing people riding around on the streets on equipment that barely has a working life of a year and they don't know that. Not everyone rides Bianchi. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
"Doug Smith" wrote in message
news:2jd_k.2663$yK5.1853@edtnps82... Tom Kunich wrote: Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. What is the wheel manufacturer that you were referring to? Notice the first line? I'm not sure that it makes a lot of sense naming the wheel manufacturer since most off the specialty wheel manufacturers are using exactly the same replicable bearings. What's more, there's always the (distant) chance that my friend and myself were an exception with the bearing failures almost exactly at the same mileage. Shouldn't we complain a lot more over the fact that you can buy VERY expensive Shimano shifters that wear out and can't be repaired? This is completely outrageous. There are still bikes riding around with the original 8-speed levers but the 9 and 10 speed stuff is wearing out rapidly and is super expensive to replace. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
On Dec 5, 11:58*am, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Doug Smith" wrote in message news:2jd_k.2663$yK5.1853@edtnps82... Tom Kunich wrote: Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. What is the wheel manufacturer that you were referring to? Notice the first line? I'm not sure that it makes a lot of sense naming the wheel manufacturer since most off the specialty wheel manufacturers are using exactly the same replicable bearings. What's more, there's always the (distant) chance that my friend and myself were an exception with the bearing failures almost exactly at the same mileage. Shouldn't we complain a lot more over the fact that you can buy VERY expensive Shimano shifters that wear out and can't be repaired? This is completely outrageous. There are still bikes riding around with the original 8-speed levers but the 9 and 10 speed stuff is wearing out rapidly and is super expensive to replace. Dumbass - Don't be a goddammed Communist. Don't whine. Be a capitalist. Let thy wallet speak. Buy another brand. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Training or Plain Riding?
On Dec 5, 11:58*am, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Doug Smith" wrote in message news:2jd_k.2663$yK5.1853@edtnps82... Tom Kunich wrote: Let's not mention the actual name of a major wheel manufacturer whose wheel bearings are good for perhaps 10,000 miles and then need replacing. In fact they can get so loose that the rocking of the axle can cause the freehub to slip. Worst case you could destroy the freehub. What is the wheel manufacturer that you were referring to? Notice the first line? I'm not sure that it makes a lot of sense naming the wheel manufacturer since most off the specialty wheel manufacturers are using exactly the same replicable bearings. What's more, there's always the (distant) chance that my friend and myself were an exception with the bearing failures almost exactly at the same mileage. Dumbass - If you were even a half decent engineer, you'd figure out that it's fast and easy to pinpoint a set of bearings that will outlast the rest of the wheelset, buy them with a few clicks of the mouse and install them. Doers do. Complainers complain. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Salisbury Plain byway query | didds | UK | 11 | June 28th 08 05:56 PM |
New Movie: Plain with Pallets... | Evan Byrne | Unicycling | 27 | September 21st 05 08:45 AM |
Land Rider - just plain bad... | Bill H. | General | 19 | August 8th 05 02:59 AM |
just plain fun (informative, too!) | Birchy | Rides | 0 | December 21st 04 11:28 PM |
Rail riding training... | andrew_carter | Unicycling | 46 | February 7th 04 09:25 AM |