Pavement cyclist denies riding dangerously

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message ...

On 16/07/2015 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2015 11:14, Mrcheerful wrote:

On 16/07/2015 11:06, Tarcap wrote:
"Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote
"Mrcheerful" wrote:
.
It is obvious to anyone of normal mental abilities that ridng a
bicycle on a pedestrian only pavement represents danger. He is due
back in court very soon.

http://metro.co.uk/2015/07/15/cyclis...ously-5297096/


There is a bit more on this lying cowardly piece of **** he
http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/ne...ding-1-7360517


The fact that he has pleaded not guilty rather compounds his guilt,
doesn't it?
I'm sure Lord Justice PhilWLee will be along in a minute to demand a
long custodial sentence.

for the child?

And her father.

After all, his parking his car outside the house opposite his garden
gate was bound to lead to danger for any innocent cyclist who happened
to be rocketing past, failed by an uncaring society which had failed to
inform him that cycling on the footway is an offence.

Society at large is clearly to blame, but parking the car there was just
downright dangerous...

...to footway cyclists.

And let's face it, no-one else actually matters.

I wonder if the cyclist is going for a compo claim, after all his life
has been ruined, so a 7 figure payout would be the least he should get.

But then again he was a cyclist, so his life was in ruins already.

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:21:01 +0100, Tarcap wrote:

But then again he was a cyclist, so his life was in ruins already.

Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment cumming from you.