Justice at last

Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off their
bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it necessary - he would
have ridden off if not stopped and of course carries no
registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration numbers
as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all have
registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom of the
barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do you have
anything sensible in the way of an argument against the registration of
cyclists?

No. Thought not.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a
viable form of transport.

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off their
bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it necessary - he would
have ridden off if not stopped and of course carries no
registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration numbers
as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all have
registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom of the
barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do you have
anything sensible in the way of an argument against the registration of
cyclists?

Wrong again.

Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off their
bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it necessary - he
would have ridden off if not stopped and of course carries no
registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all
have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom of
the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do you
have anything sensible in the way of an argument against the
registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That you scraped the bottom of the barrel? That you are a pair of *******?


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a
viable form of transport.

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off their
bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it necessary - he
would have ridden off if not stopped and of course carries no
registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all
have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom of
the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do you
have anything sensible in the way of an argument against the
registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That I'm a cyclist.

That you scraped the bottom of the barrel? That you are a pair of
*******?

Those are accolades reserved for people incapable of holding a discussion
without hurling abuse.

Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off their
bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it necessary - he
would have ridden off if not stopped and of course carries no
registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all
have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom of
the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do you
have anything sensible in the way of an argument against the
registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That I'm a cyclist.

You are very stupid, live in a fantasy world & post on a cyclists NG. Good
enough for me.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a
viable form of transport.

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off their
bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it necessary - he
would have ridden off if not stopped and of course carries no
registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all
have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom of
the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do you
have anything sensible in the way of an argument against the
registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That I'm a cyclist.

You are very stupid, live in a fantasy world & post on a cyclists NG.
Good enough for me.

Still wrong. You're doing well. What's the next inaccuracy you're going to
spout?

Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
in message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off
their bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it
necessary - he would have ridden off if not stopped and of
course carries no registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all
have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom
of the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do
you have anything sensible in the way of an argument against the
registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That I'm a cyclist.

You are very stupid, live in a fantasy world & post on a cyclists NG.
Good enough for me.

Still wrong. You're doing well. What's the next inaccuracy you're
going to spout?

What was wrong this time? You are clearly still very stupid.

Aha! I get it. You are posting to a motoring NG. Is that it ****wit?

That makes you even more pathetic!


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a
viable form of transport.

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
in message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off
their bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it
necessary - he would have ridden off if not stopped and of
course carries no registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles all
have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other pedestrian
controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom
of the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do
you have anything sensible in the way of an argument against the
registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That I'm a cyclist.

You are very stupid, live in a fantasy world & post on a cyclists NG.
Good enough for me.

Still wrong. You're doing well. What's the next inaccuracy you're
going to spout?

What was wrong this time? You are clearly still very stupid.

Aha! I get it. You are posting to a motoring NG. Is that it ****wit?

That makes you even more pathetic!

The only pathetic people are those who offer nothing except abuse.

Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
in message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
in message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off
their bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it
necessary - he would have ridden off if not stopped and of
course carries no registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles
all have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other
pedestrian controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom
of the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do
you have anything sensible in the way of an argument against
the registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That I'm a cyclist.

You are very stupid, live in a fantasy world & post on a cyclists
NG. Good enough for me.

Still wrong. You're doing well. What's the next inaccuracy you're
going to spout?

What was wrong this time? You are clearly still very stupid.

Aha! I get it. You are posting to a motoring NG. Is that it
****wit? That makes you even more pathetic!

The only pathetic people are those who offer nothing except abuse.

****wits like you only deserve abuse.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a
viable form of transport.

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in
message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
in message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
in message ...
Brimstone wrote:
"Tom Crispin" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:53:32 +0100, "The Medway Handyman"
wrote:

Whilst I'd agree that many cyclists should be pushed off
their bikes, simply for fun, they probably found it
necessary - he would have ridden off if not stopped and of
course carries no registration number.

Do you think that all pedestrians should have registration
numbers as they are so difficult to trace?

No **** for brains. Clue is in the word 'vehicle'.

Should skateboards, rollerskates, wheelchairs and tricycles
all have registration numbers?

You forgot perambulators, shopping trolleys and other
pedestrian controlled vehicles.

Its quite amazing how desperate cyclists will scrape the bottom
of the barrel in a pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible.

Now we have established you are a pair of complete *******, do
you have anything sensible in the way of an argument against
the registration of cyclists?

Wrong again.

Sorry, what was wrong?

That I'm a cyclist.

You are very stupid, live in a fantasy world & post on a cyclists
NG. Good enough for me.

Still wrong. You're doing well. What's the next inaccuracy you're
going to spout?

What was wrong this time? You are clearly still very stupid.

Aha! I get it. You are posting to a motoring NG. Is that it
****wit? That makes you even more pathetic!

The only pathetic people are those who offer nothing except abuse.

****wits like you only deserve abuse.

Thank you for the confirmation.