A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

safety in numbers? Fail



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th 12, 01:47 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mrcheerful[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,662
Default safety in numbers? Fail

"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.

The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.

The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."



So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. Visibility is good in both directions.



My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.


http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ail/story.html


Ads
  #2  
Old May 26th 12, 02:04 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Squashme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,146
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On May 26, 1:47*pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.

The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.

The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."

So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. *Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. *Visibility is good in both directions.

My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.

http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi...


For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not cross-
post this to UKRM?
  #3  
Old May 26th 12, 02:11 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On 26/05/2012 14:04, Squashme wrote:

On May 26, 1:47 pm, wrote:


"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.
The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.
The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."


So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. Visibility is good in both directions.


My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.


http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi...


For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not cross-
post this to UKRM?


Would you take the same attitude in a case where a motorcyclist failed to
give way at a junction, turned right and hit and injured a cyclist proceeding
with priority along the main road?

Just asking...

  #4  
Old May 26th 12, 03:39 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Squashme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,146
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On May 26, 2:11*pm, JNugent wrote:
On 26/05/2012 14:04, Squashme wrote:









On May 26, 1:47 pm, *wrote:
"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.
The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.
The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."
So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. *Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. *Visibility is good in both directions.
My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi....

For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not cross-
post this to UKRM?


Would you take the same attitude in a case where a motorcyclist failed to
give way at a junction, turned right and hit and injured a cyclist proceeding
with priority along the main road?

Just asking...


Which attitude would that be? Your ability to read minds is just awe-
inspiring.
  #5  
Old May 26th 12, 04:01 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On 26/05/2012 15:39, Squashme wrote:
On May 26, 2:11 pm, wrote:
On 26/05/2012 14:04, Squashme wrote:









On May 26, 1:47 pm, wrote:
"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.
The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.
The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."
So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. Visibility is good in both directions.
My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi...


For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not cross-
post this to UKRM?


Would you take the same attitude in a case where a motorcyclist failed to
give way at a junction, turned right and hit and injured a cyclist proceeding
with priority along the main road?


Just asking...


Which attitude would that be?


The attitude referred to was the one you displayed in your previous response,
of course.

Whatever it might be (and I make no attempt to describe it), would it be the
same in the alternative scenario, or is it conditioned by the transport mode?

Your ability to read minds is just awe-inspiring.


There is no need for such ability. You made your position clear.
  #6  
Old May 26th 12, 04:50 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Squashme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,146
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On May 26, 4:01*pm, JNugent wrote:
On 26/05/2012 15:39, Squashme wrote:









On May 26, 2:11 pm, *wrote:
On 26/05/2012 14:04, Squashme wrote:


On May 26, 1:47 pm, * *wrote:
"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.
The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.
The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."
So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. *Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. *Visibility is good in both directions.
My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi....
For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not cross-
post this to UKRM?
Would you take the same attitude in a case where a motorcyclist failed to
give way at a junction, turned right and hit and injured a cyclist proceeding
with priority along the main road?
Just asking...

Which attitude would that be?


The attitude referred to was the one you displayed in your previous response,
of course.


In "For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not
cross-
post this to UKRM? "?


Whatever it might be (and I make no attempt to describe it), would it be the
same in the alternative scenario, or is it conditioned by the transport mode?


If Mrcheerful posted similar repetitive, coat-trailing material
designed to wind up motorists or motorcyclists, I should certainly
still think him a ******. Although it might take me longer to tire of
it.


Your ability to read minds is just awe-inspiring.


There is no need for such ability. You made your position clear.


OK. Do I blame the elderly woman cyclist, the group of cyclists, the
middle-aged motorcyclist, the road designers, or God? I need to know
what my position is.

  #7  
Old May 26th 12, 04:56 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On 26/05/2012 16:50, Squashme wrote:

On May 26, 4:01 pm, wrote:
On 26/05/2012 15:39, Squashme wrote:
On May 26, 2:11 pm, wrote:
On 26/05/2012 14:04, Squashme wrote:
On May 26, 1:47 pm, wrote:


"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.
The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.
The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."
So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. Visibility is good in both directions.
My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi...


For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not cross-
post this to UKRM?


Would you take the same attitude in a case where a motorcyclist failed to
give way at a junction, turned right and hit and injured a cyclist proceeding
with priority along the main road?
Just asking...


Which attitude would that be?


The attitude referred to was the one you displayed in your previous response,
of course.


In "For your increased sensitivity and heightened pleasure, why not
cross-post this to UKRM? "?


Yes. What else?

Whatever it might be (and I make no attempt to describe it), would it be the
same in the alternative scenario, or is it conditioned by the transport mode?


If Mrcheerful posted similar repetitive, coat-trailing material
designed to wind up motorists or motorcyclists, I should certainly
still think him a ******. Although it might take me longer to tire of
it.


Your ability to read minds is just awe-inspiring.


There is no need for such ability. You made your position clear.


OK. Do I blame the elderly woman cyclist, the group of cyclists, the
middle-aged motorcyclist, the road designers, or God? I need to know
what my position is.


Let's make it easier.

If you were reading ukrm, and if there were a story there about a
motorcyclist who had failed to give way at a junction, turned right and hit
and injured a cyclist proceeding with priority along the main road, would you
sarcastically advise a cyclist (posting equally sarcastically) to x-post his
remarks to ukrc?
  #8  
Old May 26th 12, 11:29 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Judith[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,000
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:47:06 +0100, "Mrcheerful"
wrote:

"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.

The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.

The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."



So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. Visibility is good in both directions.



My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.


http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ail/story.html



I see someone has added a very sensible comment:

================================================== ===============
by NumbNuts2012

Saturday, May 26 2012, 11:28PM

Old dears of this age should not be cycling on busy main roads. Cycling on such
roads is dangerous enough for the young and fit - hardly safe for elderly
people.

Simon Mason

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  #9  
Old May 27th 12, 06:30 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.motorcycles
Squashme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,146
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On May 26, 1:47*pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
"A PENSIONER was last night being treated for serious head injuries she
suffered in a collision with a motorbike.

The female cyclist was taken to the Unviersity Hospital of North
Staffordshire by air ambulance following the smash on the A54 in Somerford,
Congleton, at 11.25am yesterday.

The 73-year-old woman was in a group of cyclists which was exiting from Moss
Lane on to the A54, travelling towards Congleton."

So they were turning right from a side road without ascertaining that the
road was clear, probably relying on force of numbers to try and coerce
people into giving way to them. *Give way lines and signs need to be obeyed
by all classes of road user. *Visibility is good in both directions.

My thoughts are with the motorcyclist.

http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi...


Anybody know this road? Not much detail, but if visibility is good in
both directions, does any blame attach to the motorcyclist?
  #10  
Old May 27th 12, 07:03 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.motorcycles
Paul Carmichael[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default safety in numbers? Fail

On 27/05/12 19:30, Squashme escribió:

http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk...ed-hospital-bi...


Anybody know this road? Not much detail, but if visibility is good in
both directions, does any blame attach to the motorcyclist?


Dunno, the url is broken.

--
Paul.
CBR1100XX SuperBlackbird (Buen mueble de patio), Orbea Dakar, Legs
BOTAFOT #4 BOTAFOF #30 MRO #24 OMF #15 UKRMMA #30
http://paulc.es/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Safety In numbers Judith[_4_] UK 10 May 6th 12 09:09 PM
More safety in numbers? Mrcheerful[_3_] UK 1 April 28th 12 03:29 PM
safety in numbers Zebee Johnstone Australia 1 June 25th 09 05:32 AM
Safety in Numbers Roos Eisma UK 249 September 17th 08 09:20 AM
Safety in Numbers. Simon Mason UK 11 April 23rd 05 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.