|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed. And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that? Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do. I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions. You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world. So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed. By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters.... And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that? Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do. I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions. You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world. So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:17:49 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed. By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters.... By definition, they are parks. Just a few among the over 6,600 in the US alone. Or are you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional preserve" can't be called a "park?" Either way, how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that? Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do. I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions. You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world. So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:53:36 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:17:49 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/ A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed. By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters.... By definition, they are parks. Just a few among the over 6,600 in the US alone. Or are you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional preserve" can't be called a "park?" Either way, how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that? Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do. I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions. You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world. So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? A place where hunting is allowed is called a "hunting reserve". It's definitely not a park. Only an idiot (like you) would call that a park. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
Whatever fool.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
UK puts National Park Rangers on Mountain Bikes--U.S. Needs to Dothe Same!
On Jun 19, 12:39*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:53:36 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 7:17:49 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:02:03 PM UTC-4, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Monday, June 17, 2013 7:24:19 PM UTC-7, wrote: * In short, "they" ARE allowed in parks. So, liar, please explain how mountain biking is "by far" more damaging than things like hunting and driving a Jeep. Your semantic games are tedious, Michael. But, since that seems to be all you can handle, here you go:http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/parks/hunt/A few dozen *Parks* where hunting is allowed. By definition, those aren't parks, whatever they are called. They are hunting grounds. Do you support hunting? Because you do support mountain biking, which also kills lots of animals. Not that a guy unwilling to give his real name matters.... By definition, they are parks. Just a few among the over 6,600 in the US alone. Or are you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional preserve" can't be called a "park?" Either way, how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? *And that's just one state. It wouldn't be hard to find more... except for an idiot like you, I suppose. Now... How is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than that? Those people are idiots. Like you. By definition, a park is to preserve nature, not kill it, like hunters & mountain bikers do. I don't care about your silly conveniently-adapted-for-the-discussion definitions. You wrote, "Mountain biking is by far the MOST damaging activity allowed in any park." That's ANY park. Obviously that includes approximately 6,600 US state parks and those in other parts of the world. So how is riding a bicycle "by far" more damaging than hunting? A place where hunting is allowed is called a "hunting reserve". It's definitely not a park. Only an idiot (like you) would call that a park. State parks are called "parks." And many allow hunting. I'm sure the park officials you write letters to on a regular basis would appreciate you calling them idiots. Furthermore, you didn't answer the questions, as usual. I asked, "are you suggesting that "state parks" aren't "parks" and a "regional preserve" can't be called a "park?"" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Bikers Destroying Jasper National Park, Canada | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 1 | November 11th 08 12:14 PM |
Bicycling the trailridge in the Rocky Mountain National Park... | Fer | General | 7 | January 30th 08 09:07 PM |
Biking in the Rocky Mountain National Park??? | Fer | General | 4 | November 4th 07 02:06 PM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 8 | March 18th 07 06:24 AM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 6 | March 16th 07 03:35 AM |