STOP THE FEAR MONGERING

On Mar 5, 8:37*am, Bob Schwartz
wrote:
K. Gringioni wrote:
Will you ever have this particular bot doing more sophisticated stuff
than: Republican=good Democrat=bad?

If it works, don't fix it.

Maybe if people ever stop responding I'll think about it.

Bob Schwartz



Dumbass -


It works, but only with a small set of people.

Don't you want to take over the world? Be like Google.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

On Mar 5, 9:25*am, wrote:

Uh, do keep in mind that he is now in the Good Republicans = Good, Bad
(not really) Republicans = Bad, Democrats = Bad. He has become more
nuanced about Republicans.

He's actually a member of the "Republican Cult". They all march in
lockstep, any deviation is severely punished- they are forced to kiss
Rush's giant fat ass. Kunty is now required to repudiate Bush. It's
the party line fresh from CPAC:

Conservative columnist Deroy Murdock:
"Sadly, our former president propelled America to socialism - all the
way to third base," "Our side emerged with neither principle nor
power."
"Why is 'the architect' giving free advice" on cable TV when
conservatives are struggling out of the "rubble" of the destroyed
buildings built with Rove's "blueprints? Would you rather take flying
advice from Captain Sully or the pilot of the Hindenburg?"

John Bolton, former US ambassador to the United Nations: "We are
better off, in some sense, not having the Bush administration to
defend. Too many people connected the Bush administration to
conservatism, and as we all know, that didn't happen."

Former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich: "We didn't get real change. We
got big spending under Bush, now we have big spending under Obama,"
"The great irony . . . is that we have a Bush-Obama big spending
program that is bipartisan in nature."

"John McCain was so much a part of the problem." -Conservative
columnist Michelle Malkin

Ah, someone had forgotten Reagan's 11th Commandment: "Thou shalt not
speak ill of a fellow Republican." I love it!
-Paul

On Mar 5, 12:51*pm, "
wrote:

Jeez, JT, I'm working on it, okay? *People are
so impatient, they want change in an instant.
I have a day job, because ol' Barack was too nice
to make Secretary of Revenge a cabinet level position.
And it's not easy to compile a national list of
up-against-the-wall-mother****ers on evenings
and weekends while still keeping up a Fat Master
training schedule.

"As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
* * *I've got a little list--I've got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
* * *And who never would be missed--who never would be missed!"

-Ko-Ko Ben

Actually Ben
From the reaction of the left wingnuts to Obama so far we were
expecting the same guy to show up in the WH. They're ****ed because he
hasn't been one of them so far, and I'm pleasantly surprised.
http://tinyurl.com/6a9yr2

http://tinyurl.com/9o33ut


Seems like we were both wrong so far. You can do any number of
searches around "Obama Revolt left angry" and other words and come up
with plenty of stuff. I expected what they expected.
Bill C

On Mar 5, 10:53*am, William Asher wrote:
Bob Schwartz wrote:
K. Gringioni wrote:
Will you ever have this particular bot doing more sophisticated stuff
than: Republican=good Democrat=bad?

If it works, don't fix it.

Maybe if people ever stop responding I'll think about it.

I've trained it not to respond to me. *I'm not entirely sure how that
happened, but I'm not complaining. *

We achieved a higher plane of existence. I know how I did it. I used
the magic word: Kuntitch.
-Paul

On Mar 5, 1:45*pm, Scott wrote:

You are every bit as guilty of the one party good, other party bad
problem that you ascribe to Kunich.

Most of us are that way, too, so don't fret too much. *Just don't
pretend that you don't fall into that trap.

Scott- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kurgan's the last one I'd try and pin that on. He calls it the way he
sees it, pretty much without regard to Party as far as I can see and
I've been sparring with him for years.
I don't currently agree with him completely on the stock market/
government influence bit though because there are numerous ways the
government can, and does effect the markets, such as legislation
favorable to an industry or group, breaking up a corporation, legally
attacking a corporation, etc... One of the reasons that the US auto
companies fought new CAFE standards so hard was that they were
positioned in large gas guzzlers and the core of their profit was in
trucks and suvs. Any investor with half a brain would have bailed from
them and switched to the Japanese makers who have always been much
better positioned in that market, thereby trashing the value of the US
makers until, and if they could adapt.
Harley Davidson is a great example of direct government intervention
saving a company. Granted they had to be smart enough to take
advantage of it, but all of a sudden they had a massive cash infusion
at little to no cost, to update their equipment, marketing and
planning. Didn't take long for folks to bet on the company that wasn't
massively debt loaded getting to that state.
I really think he's just oversimplifying the point since Good/Bad
seems to be about as sophisticated as it usually gets around here. In
the simplified form I generally agree with him.
Bill C

On Mar 5, 11:10*am, Bill C wrote:
On Mar 5, 1:57*pm, "Paul G." wrote:



On Mar 5, 5:11*am, John Forrest Tomlinson
wrote:

Bill C wrote

JT, when was the last time, before Obama's election that you told
anyone this is a great, free Country and you are proud of it, and you
are optimistic about it?

I don't know if I have before or afterwards.

But I don't think that's important -- in elections I look to who can
do the best for teh country, not the sort of patrotic buzzwords that
work for you. *And I try not to fall for bogeymen in deciding who not
to vote for. *You should try that anti-bogeyman thing.

Bill doesn't realize that if he'd been born in Mexico or Saudi Arabia
or Switzerland he'd also be babbling about how proud he is of his
great, free country and how optimistic he is. *Same thing for
Christian religious nuts. *They'd be devout Muslims if they had been
raised that way, or Hindus, Jews, whatever.

It's really about their need for that. Tribalism is hardwired into
their brains. *If they lived in Philly they'd "love" Philly and be
"proud" of Philly and be "optimistic" about Philly. *I think I'm gonna
puke now.
-Paul

Bull**** Paul
*I wasn't born overseas, but I sure as hell have family who were,
friends who were, people who risked their lives to come to America for
what it represents and tries to be, and love it here.
*Guess those people, literally, dying to come here are only doing it
for the money I guess, right?
*Bill C

What does that have to do with what I wrote? Nothing. People who
leave their tribe behind for something better are like me, not like
you. I would also point out that people leave the US. It's not a one
way street.
-Paul

On Mar 5, 2:39*pm, "Paul G." wrote:
On Mar 5, 11:10*am, Bill C wrote:





On Mar 5, 1:57*pm, "Paul G." wrote:

On Mar 5, 5:11*am, John Forrest Tomlinson
wrote:

Bill C wrote

JT, when was the last time, before Obama's election that you told
anyone this is a great, free Country and you are proud of it, and you
are optimistic about it?

I don't know if I have before or afterwards.

But I don't think that's important -- in elections I look to who can
do the best for teh country, not the sort of patrotic buzzwords that
work for you. *And I try not to fall for bogeymen in deciding who not
to vote for. *You should try that anti-bogeyman thing.

Bill doesn't realize that if he'd been born in Mexico or Saudi Arabia
or Switzerland he'd also be babbling about how proud he is of his
great, free country and how optimistic he is. *Same thing for
Christian religious nuts. *They'd be devout Muslims if they had been
raised that way, or Hindus, Jews, whatever.

It's really about their need for that. Tribalism is hardwired into
their brains. *If they lived in Philly they'd "love" Philly and be
"proud" of Philly and be "optimistic" about Philly. *I think I'm gonna
puke now.
-Paul

Bull**** Paul
*I wasn't born overseas, but I sure as hell have family who were,
friends who were, people who risked their lives to come to America for
what it represents and tries to be, and love it here.
*Guess those people, literally, dying to come here are only doing it
for the money I guess, right?
*Bill C

What does that have to do with what I wrote? *Nothing. People who
leave their tribe behind for something better are like me, not like
you. I would also point out that people leave the US. It's not a one
way street.
-Paul- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

AHH YOU GOOD, YOU THEM I see. Tell me why you think we have vastly
more people clamoring to come in than get out?
Bill C

On Mar 5, 11:12*am, "K. Gringioni" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:45*am, Scott wrote:



On Mar 5, 12:29*am, "K. Gringioni" wrote:

On Mar 4, 5:31*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

"K. Gringioni" wrote in message

...

That's not the reason I'm smarter than you. There's a number of
reasons and that's not one of them. I'll list a few of them though.

1) I read a lot
2) I try to learn from what I read
3) I don't look at the world from the prism of: 1 political
party=good, the other political party=bad

I'm rather surprised that you'd admit to reading. You're hardly the kind
that would learn anything from reading as is plainly shown by your comments
here.

By the way, if you don't understand my position on politics perhaps you
could either ask or simply pass.

Dumbass -

Your philosophy is self-evident.

Republican=good Democrat=bad.

Simpleton.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Man, oh man, it pains me to do this (come to Kunich's defense, that
is) but I gotta say, Henry, you comment above is so damn comical.
Hello, kettle, this is pot. *You're black.

You are every bit as guilty of the one party good, other party bad
problem that you ascribe to Kunich.

Dumbass -

Ha.

You mean like how I think General Motors and Chrysler should be
allowed to go bankrupt? That unions have outlived their usefulness in
this country and need to go away? That more free trade is better, not
less? That we should adopt a flat tax system? That we should issue
more H1B visas?

Those types of Democratic Party platforms?

You've got your head up your ass. Just like Kunich.

Yeah, they think because THEY line up to kiss Rush's fat ass we must
all line up to kiss Michael Moore's giant ass. Nothing could be
further from the truth. There is far more diversity of opinion on the
left than on the right.
-Paul

Paul G. wrote:
If they lived in Philly they'd "love" Philly and be
"proud" of Philly and be "optimistic" about Philly. I think I'm gonna
puke now.

As well you should. Everyone in rbr knows Philly sucks.

Bob Schwartz

Donald Munro wrote:
Well it does do gay=evil and gay=liberal too, although its probably hard
coded.

curtis wrote:
As long as it doesn't go to evil=gay and liberal=gay. It would remove all
the room for us fellow travelors.

Which would imply the transitive law for equality doesn't apply
in Kunichian systems.