Coverage RR - WMN

62.169.123.232/sportsite/index.html
--
Davey Crockett
Flying the Flag of the English
The Flag of Hengest and Horsa

On 29/07/2012 13:33, Davey Crockett wrote:
62.169.123.232/sportsite/index.html

Allez allez Lizzie.

--

On 29/07/2012 15:25, atriage wrote:
On 29/07/2012 13:33, Davey Crockett wrote:
62.169.123.232/sportsite/index.html

Allez allez Lizzie.

No ****ing time checks...shoot the race organizers.

--

On 29/07/2012 15:27, atriage wrote:
On 29/07/2012 15:25, atriage wrote:
On 29/07/2012 13:33, Davey Crockett wrote:
62.169.123.232/sportsite/index.html

Allez allez Lizzie.

No ****ing time checks...shoot the race organizers.


Shock horror! Vos wins. Lizzie did well though.

--

On 29/07/2012 3:27 PM, atriage wrote:
On 29/07/2012 15:25, atriage wrote:
On 29/07/2012 13:33, Davey Crockett wrote:
62.169.123.232/sportsite/index.html

Allez allez Lizzie.

No ****ing time checks...shoot the race organizers.


They are claiming that tweets blocked the network/(s?) the race position
GPS uses. To be fair, there were about a million of us lining the course
on Saturday, so I guess there was a good deal of tweeting going on.
Personally, not guilty!

--
Chris

'Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it
every six months.'

(Oscar Wilde.)

On 30/07/2012 13:06, Mower Man wrote:
On 29/07/2012 3:27 PM, atriage wrote:
On 29/07/2012 15:25, atriage wrote:
On 29/07/2012 13:33, Davey Crockett wrote:
62.169.123.232/sportsite/index.html

Allez allez Lizzie.

No ****ing time checks...shoot the race organizers.


They are claiming that tweets blocked the network/(s?) the race position GPS
uses. To be fair, there were about a million of us lining the course on
Saturday, so I guess there was a good deal of tweeting going on. Personally, not
guilty!


Interesting, yet another reason for banning ****ter if it's true.


--

Well, twitter isn't going to be banned. How would they?

But their explanation sounds like so much BS to me. I thought GPS had its own frequencies.

Do they give a more detailed explanation? I'm interested.

On Monday, July 30, 2012 5:27:44 AM UTC-7, atriage wrote:
On 30/07/2012 13:06, Mower Man wrote:

On 29/07/2012 3:27 PM, atriage wrote:

On 29/07/2012 15:25, atriage wrote:

On 29/07/2012 13:33, Davey Crockett wrote:

62.169.123.232/sportsite/index.html



Allez allez Lizzie.



No ****ing time checks...shoot the race organizers.





They are claiming that tweets blocked the network/(s?) the race position GPS

uses. To be fair, there were about a million of us lining the course on

Saturday, so I guess there was a good deal of tweeting going on. Personally, not

guilty!





Interesting, yet another reason for banning ****ter if it's true.





--

On 31/07/2012 01:14, yirgster wrote:
Well, twitter isn't going to be banned. How would they?

No **** Sherlock.

But their explanation sounds like so much BS to me. I thought GPS had its own frequencies.

Do they give a more detailed explanation? I'm interested.


GPS wasn't affected but relaying of GPS info was (they claim).
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ioc-...ing-road-races

--