Scum attacks cyclist who stopped for pedestrian

On 15/11/2019 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:

On 15/11/2019 02:07, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:32, TMS320 wrote:

I have told you before that you have no right to comment about
cyclists when you are sitting behind a windscreen. Your choice is
more dangerous.

There we have it.

Yes, it's a fact.

Whatever the law says you can or can't do.

Which law, statute, rule of nature or opinion of an idiot says that I
may not comment on the law-breaking of typical chav cyclists?

The same laws, statutes, rules of nature or opinions of idiots that
allow comments about the danger caused by motorists. You really are a
fool if you think bodies on slabs don't count so long as the law is obeyed.

On 16/11/2019 11:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:

On 15/11/2019 02:07, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:32, TMS320 wrote:

I have told you before that you have no right to comment about
cyclists when you are sitting behind a windscreen. Your choice is
more dangerous.

There we have it.

Yes, it's a fact.

Whatever the law says you can or can't do.

Which law, statute, rule of nature or opinion of an idiot says that I
may not comment on the law-breaking of typical chav cyclists?

The same laws, statutes, rules of nature or opinions of idiots that
allow comments about the danger caused by motorists. You really are a
fool if you think bodies on slabs don't count so long as the law is obeyed.

What are you trying to talk about?

Are you really trying to say that cyclists are allowed to do as they like?

On 16/11/2019 11:57, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:

On 15/11/2019 02:07, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:32, TMS320 wrote:

I have told you before that you have no right to comment
about cyclists when you are sitting behind a windscreen.
Your choice is more dangerous.

There we have it.

Yes, it's a fact.

Whatever the law says you can or can't do.

Which law, statute, rule of nature or opinion of an idiot says
that I may not comment on the law-breaking of typical chav
cyclists?

The same laws, statutes, rules of nature or opinions of idiots that
allow comments about the danger caused by motorists. You really
are a fool if you think bodies on slabs don't count so long as the
law is obeyed.

What are you trying to talk about?

Are you really trying to say that cyclists are allowed to do as they
like?

When are you going to learn to read?

On 16/11/2019 12:36, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:57, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:

On 15/11/2019 02:07, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:32, TMS320 wrote:

I have told you before that you have no right to comment
about cyclists when you are sitting behind a windscreen.
Your choice is more dangerous.

There we have it.

Yes, it's a fact.

Whatever the law says you can or can't do.

Which law, statute, rule of nature or opinion of an idiot says
that I may not comment on the law-breaking of typical chav
cyclists?

The same laws, statutes, rules of nature or opinions of idiots that
allow comments about the danger caused by motorists. You really
are a fool if you think bodies on slabs don't count so long as the
law is obeyed.

What are you trying to talk about?

Are you really trying to say that cyclists are allowed to do as they
like?

When are you going to learn to read?

OK... you *are* trying to say that cyclists can do as they like and are
not subject to traffic law.

If you are not saying that, perhaps you will be so good as to explain
how your little fits of pique mean anything else.

On 16/11/2019 14:26, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 12:36, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:57, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 02:07, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:32, TMS320 wrote:

I have told you before that you have no right to comment
about cyclists when you are sitting behind a windscreen.
Your choice is more dangerous.

There we have it.

Yes, it's a fact.

Whatever the law says you can or can't do.

Which law, statute, rule of nature or opinion of an idiot says
that I may not comment on the law-breaking of typical chav
cyclists?

The same laws, statutes, rules of nature or opinions of idiots that
allow comments about the danger caused by motorists. You really
are a fool if you think bodies on slabs don't count so long as the
law is obeyed.

What are you trying to talk about?

Are you really trying to say that cyclists are allowed to do as they
like?

When are you going to learn to read?

OK... you *are* trying to say that cyclists can do as they like and are
not subject to traffic law.

I am trying to tell you that you are about as thick as a brick.

On 16/11/2019 15:05, TMS320 wrote:

On 16/11/2019 14:26, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 12:36, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:57, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 02:07, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:32, TMS320 wrote:

I have told you before that you have no right to comment
about cyclists when you are sitting behind a windscreen.
Your choice is more dangerous.

There we have it.

Yes, it's a fact.

Whatever the law says you can or can't do.

Which law, statute, rule of nature or opinion of an idiot says
that I may not comment on the law-breaking of typical chav
cyclists?

The same laws, statutes, rules of nature or opinions of idiots that
allow comments about the danger caused by motorists. You really
are a fool if you think bodies on slabs don't count so long as the
law is obeyed.

What are you trying to talk about?

Are you really trying to say that cyclists are allowed to do as they
like?

When are you going to learn to read?

OK... you *are* trying to say that cyclists can do as they like and
are not subject to traffic law.

I am trying to tell you that you are about as thick as a brick.

Oh dear...

You fail to convince me that cyclists are saints who ought to be allowed
to do exactly as they please (and sod everyone else) and then you throw
a strop when you realise you aren't going to be able to convince me (or
anyone else) of it.

Have you thought of attending an anger management course?

TMS320 wrote:
On 16/11/2019 14:26, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 12:36, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:57, JNugent wrote:
On 16/11/2019 11:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 12:58, JNugent wrote:
On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 02:07, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:32, TMS320 wrote:

I have told you before that you have no right to comment
about cyclists when you are sitting behind a windscreen.
Your choice is more dangerous.

There we have it.

Yes, it's a fact.

Whatever the law says you can or can't do.

Which law, statute, rule of nature or opinion of an idiot says
that I may not comment on the law-breaking of typical chav
cyclists?

The same laws, statutes, rules of nature or opinions of idiots
that allow comments about the danger caused by motorists. You
really are a fool if you think bodies on slabs don't count so
long as the law is obeyed.

What are you trying to talk about?

Are you really trying to say that cyclists are allowed to do as
they like?

When are you going to learn to read?

OK... you *are* trying to say that cyclists can do as they like and
are not subject to traffic law.

I am trying to tell you that you are about as thick as a brick.

Q:
Who rides a silly, untraceable, uninsured pedal bike in the ****ing down
rain?
A: ...........

On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:19:35 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

Q:
Who rides a silly, untraceable, uninsured pedal bike in the ****ing down
rain?
A: ...........

I did for 15 years, day in day out.
Saved about £15000 in fuel alone and it made me super fit.
One of the best things I ever did.

Simon Mason wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:19:35 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Q:
Who rides a silly, untraceable, uninsured pedal bike in the ****ing
down rain?
A: ...........

I did for 15 years, day in day out.
Saved about £15000 in fuel alone and it made me super fit.
One of the best things I ever did.

Then came the bridge ................

On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:30:45 PM UTC, Simon Mason wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:19:35 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

Q:
Who rides a silly, untraceable, uninsured pedal bike in the ****ing down
rain?
A: ...........

I did for 15 years, day in day out.
Saved about £15000 in fuel alone and it made me super fit.
One of the best things I ever did.

I //had// insurance though which netted me £5000 after a car driver knocked me off busting my clavicle.