#41
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
On Nov 17, 5:32*pm, BL wrote:
On 11/17/2011 2:22 PM, --D-y wrote: On Nov 16, 6:43 pm, *wrote: This is far, far beyond being an FDA investigation. Even if it wasn't, I interpret this kind of expenditure for legal services by a person claiming to be innocent of any wrongdoing to be a total disconnect. They're bringing their big guns-- and worse, the loose cannons ("that would be Novitsky"). I think the standard warning is "you'd better bring the best defense you can afford" when you go to court, for any reason-- or, better yet (often if not always), hire the best you can and stay out of court. Or, are you hoping Lance won't fight hard, and lose?g *Chip, chip, chip, Brian. --D-y I hope he fights as hard as he can--to his last penny. Make his defense counsel wealthier than they already are. That's only one layer of the "crooked lawyer" onion-- "make sure you get it all". --D-y |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
On 11/18/2011 6:17 PM, BL wrote:
On 11/18/2011 2:46 PM, Jimmy July wrote: On 11/15/2011 04:49 PM, BL wrote: On 11/15/2011 11:47 AM, dave a wrote: On 11/15/2011 5:36 AM, Brad Anders wrote: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/arms...federal-battle Looks like Laff's Tuesday may be coming soon. Or not. The entire story is devoted to the fact that there is no news to report. It's definitely Tuesday. It was apparently begun by Fabiani. It's part of the pr offensive that is about to take off with the indictments. There you have it, folks! Brian says the indictments are "about to take off". It's last January, all over again! I think it will be early next year for indictments. Nobody wants to indict and start a major case during the holiday period. OK, it's a Tuesday in January again. Am I taking unwarranted liberties if I interpret "next year" to mean 2013AD? There's always some reason, after the fact, that you didn't really predict the things you predicted. It'd be good if we cleared up the inevitable misunderstanding ahead of time. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
On 11/19/2011 3:20 PM, Jimmy July wrote:
On 11/18/2011 6:17 PM, BL wrote: On 11/18/2011 2:46 PM, Jimmy July wrote: On 11/15/2011 04:49 PM, BL wrote: On 11/15/2011 11:47 AM, dave a wrote: On 11/15/2011 5:36 AM, Brad Anders wrote: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/arms...federal-battle Looks like Laff's Tuesday may be coming soon. Or not. The entire story is devoted to the fact that there is no news to report. It's definitely Tuesday. It was apparently begun by Fabiani. It's part of the pr offensive that is about to take off with the indictments. There you have it, folks! Brian says the indictments are "about to take off". It's last January, all over again! I think it will be early next year for indictments. Nobody wants to indict and start a major case during the holiday period. OK, it's a Tuesday in January again. Am I taking unwarranted liberties if I interpret "next year" to mean 2013AD? There's always some reason, after the fact, that you didn't really predict the things you predicted. It'd be good if we cleared up the inevitable misunderstanding ahead of time. I don't recall making any firm predictions. I have offered opinions on when an indictment might come down and have certainly not seen my opinions become a reality. I do think an indictment is coming, sooner rather than later. To paraphrase David Steinberg, the US DoJ moves in its own mystical way on its own schedule. That said, I do think that Fabiani's posturing this past week indicates that Armstrong's counsel expects an indictment soon and has effectively taunted the DoJ to indict. IMO, they will. I don't see this investigation lingering on into 2013. I think you need to make a distinction between opinions and predictions. So, I will *predict* indictments by July 1, 2012. And if I'm wrong? So what? ) |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
On Nov 20, 9:27*am, BL wrote:
I don't recall making any firm predictions. Well, at least, none that have come true. Only ones that become true are "firm". |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
BL wrote:
I don't recall making any firm predictions. Brad Anders wrote: Well, at least, none that have come true. Only ones that become true are "firm". Ask Schrodinger's cat. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
In article ,
Simply Fred wrote: BL wrote: I don't recall making any firm predictions. Brad Anders wrote: Well, at least, none that have come true. Only ones that become true are "firm". Ask Schrodinger's cat. You will get a better answer from his rat. -- Old Fritz |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
On Nov 20, 9:27*am, BL wrote:
So, I will *predict* indictments by July 1, 2012. And if I'm wrong? So what? ) The problem isn't if you're wrong - it's if you're right. I'll make my own prediction - if LA is indicted by July 1, 2012, you will ignore every single time you previously predicted imminent indictments, and tell us all how you've always been right about LA's prosecution, and act as if you personally had delivered the indictment papers to LA. Prove me wrong... |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
On Nov 27, 7:30*pm, Brad Anders wrote:
On Nov 20, 9:27*am, BL wrote: So, I will *predict* indictments by July 1, 2012. And if I'm wrong? So what? ) The problem isn't if you're wrong - it's if you're right. I'll make my own prediction - if LA is indicted by July 1, 2012, you will ignore every single time you previously predicted imminent indictments, and tell us all how you've always been right about LA's prosecution, and act as if you personally had delivered the indictment papers to LA. Prove me wrong... Most of us have probably considered this scenario and I don't think it will change anyone's perception of BL. The monkey that eventually writes something is still a monkey. Phil H |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
On Nov 27, 7:30*pm, Brad Anders wrote:
On Nov 20, 9:27*am, BL wrote: So, I will *predict* indictments by July 1, 2012. And if I'm wrong? So what? ) The problem isn't if you're wrong - it's if you're right. I'll make my own prediction - if LA is indicted by July 1, 2012, you will ignore every single time you previously predicted imminent indictments, and tell us all how you've always been right about LA's prosecution, and act as if you personally had delivered the indictment papers to LA. Candyass! Fredmaster Ben |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
It's Tuesday
Brad Anders wrote:
The problem isn't if you're wrong - it's if you're right. I'll make my own prediction - if LA is indicted by July 1, 2012, you will ignore every single time you previously predicted imminent indictments, and tell us all how you've always been right about LA's prosecution, and act as if you personally had delivered the indictment papers to LA. Prove me wrong... A meteorite will strike the earth on a Tuesday or +/- 6 days before or after a Tuesday. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it Tuesday yet? | A. Dumas[_2_] | Racing | 1 | July 16th 11 02:10 PM |
Could Lafferty's Tuesday be this Tuesday ? | Anton Berlin | Racing | 36 | May 26th 11 10:24 AM |
Almost missed 'cuz it's not a Tuesday! | Mike Jacoubowsky | Racing | 7 | May 20th 11 11:22 PM |
Super Tuesday Counts | flyingdutch | Australia | 7 | February 12th 07 06:06 AM |
Tuesday will be Horner's Day | Ken Prager | Racing | 8 | July 20th 05 08:47 PM |